HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Offbeat » Creative Speculation (Group) » Prefect quote about the 9...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Wed Jan 18, 2012, 10:40 PM

Prefect quote about the 9/11 truth movement......

"Adherents of the 9/11 Truth movement would use the reverse scientific method to arrive at their conclusions, as they determine what happened, throw out all the data that doesn't fit their conclusion, and then hail their findings as the only possible conclusion."~ Thomas W. Eagar-MIT engineering professor

18 replies, 3939 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 18 replies Author Time Post
Reply Prefect quote about the 9/11 truth movement...... (Original post)
Logical Jan 2012 OP
RZM Jan 2012 #1
Logical Jan 2012 #2
RZM Jan 2012 #3
Logical Jan 2012 #4
gyroscope Jan 2012 #5
Logical Jan 2012 #10
zappaman Jan 2012 #6
Politicalboi Mar 2012 #14
Norrin Radd Jan 2012 #7
Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #8
MicaelS Jan 2012 #9
zeemike Feb 2012 #11
Politicalboi Mar 2012 #12
greyl Mar 2012 #13
Politicalboi Mar 2012 #15
greyl Mar 2012 #16
Politicalboi Mar 2012 #17
greyl Mar 2012 #18

Response to Logical (Original post)

Wed Jan 18, 2012, 10:42 PM

1. Oh please, what does he know

 

He's only an engineering professor at one of the most prestigious technical schools in the country. I trust Charlie Sheen and Alex Jones much more.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RZM (Reply #1)

Wed Jan 18, 2012, 10:52 PM

2. LOL....good point. Oprah knows more also!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Reply #2)

Wed Jan 18, 2012, 10:54 PM

3. Plus Rosie O'Donnell

 

Who said that the official story 'was the first time that fire ever melted steel.'

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RZM (Reply #3)

Wed Jan 18, 2012, 10:57 PM

4. Wow, the stupidity is amazing!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)

Thu Jan 19, 2012, 12:32 AM

5. Projection much?

has Mr. Eagar ever considered doing stand-up comedy?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gyroscope (Reply #5)

Thu Jan 19, 2012, 07:19 PM

10. No, but all the 9/11 truthers do comedy daily!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)

Thu Jan 19, 2012, 01:03 AM

6. That's is exactly.

Also explains why there are so many stories within the "truth movement".
Think mini-nukes brought down the towers? You can find one or two things that support your theory.
Think thermite/thermate/super-mystery thermitemate brought down the towers? You can find one or two things that support your theory.
Think their were no planes involved? You can find one or two things that support your theory.
Think a DEW brought down the towers? You can find one or two things that support your theory.
Think a missle hit the pentagon? You can find one or two things that support your theory.
Think monkeys with explosive in backpacks brought down the towers? You can find one or two things that support your theory.
It's 2012 and the "truth movement" is almost gone. Sorry crazies, but you had your chance.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to zappaman (Reply #6)

Sun Mar 11, 2012, 06:37 AM

14. Our chance was a trial

Which for some reason will never see the light of day. We think you deniers are just as crazy. You take the Bush administrations investigation as fact, and all else be damned. We use eye witness video of the events. People who were in the buildings who HEARD and FELT explosions, and that includes firemen. But I guess they were mistaken, they were only there, who are they to say. But some MIT "professor" has it right. LOL! You guys are funny.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)

Thu Jan 19, 2012, 04:07 AM

7. Ford Prefect?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Norrin Radd (Reply #7)

Thu Jan 19, 2012, 10:03 AM

8. I'm holding out for the Beeblebrox quote, myself.

"There was an accident with a controlled demolition setup and a time machine, now pay attention!"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)

Thu Jan 19, 2012, 11:17 AM

9. Gawddamn Big Science and Big Scientists...

They're all in a CONspiracy to deny the "real" truth" to the people.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)

Thu Feb 9, 2012, 09:27 AM

11. Projection is all that is.

Because the official version does that exact same thing...and if you don't believe the official version then you are just nuts...and must be ridiculed so that it chills the people into silence.
People are so easily manipulated...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)

Sun Mar 11, 2012, 06:28 AM

12. Other engineer professors have said different

But I guess this one is the right one. LOL!

Can he explain why the Pentagon let 40 minutes go by and did NOTHING for a possible attack after the second tower crash took place? No he can't. As a matter of fact, no one has told us why our biggest DEFENSE building did nothing to protect itself or the rest of D.C. for 40 minutes LOL! And that these "terrorist" who according to the media were pilots, and chumy with flight crews, flew over a lot of military bases instead of taking off from JFK. But we'll go along with this little game. Perhaps this "professor" will invest in fire demolition as his next career move. LOL!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Politicalboi (Reply #12)

Sun Mar 11, 2012, 06:35 AM

13. Prove it. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to greyl (Reply #13)

Sun Mar 11, 2012, 06:43 AM

15. Here's one of many

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Architects_%26_Engineers_for_9/11_Truth

But I'm sure "they" are not good enough. Hopefully someday this will be solved once and for all. Fire has NEVER taken steel and concrete buildings down before or after 9/11. And WTC7 wasn't hit by a plane, so there's that too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Politicalboi (Reply #15)

Sun Mar 11, 2012, 06:47 AM

16. Oh God, you're right. How do you know which "engineer professors" to believe? nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to greyl (Reply #16)

Sun Mar 11, 2012, 07:06 AM

17. Whatever

How do you know which one is right? You're still going to believe what you believe, and so am I. What other buildings have fallen to the ground due to fire since 9/11? NONE. The world is waiting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Politicalboi (Reply #17)

Sun Mar 11, 2012, 07:16 AM

18. How do YOU choose which "engineer professors" to believe? nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread