HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Offbeat » Creative Speculation (Group) » It is this simple regardi...

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 02:28 PM

It is this simple regarding 9/11...NO ONE has ever came forward and said 'I was part of it!"....

Once again. This "PLAN" would have taken 100s or 1000s of people to pull off.

10 years later, NOT ONE of these people has come forward, felt guilty or told a friend/lover about their part in this plan?

The BIGGEST conspiracy in the history of the world and NOT ONE person has come forward to say "I was part of it!".

In today's world, there would be offers of MILLIONS of dollars for ONE person to come forward with proof that 9/11 was an inside job. Book deals, movie deals, etc.

None of this makes any sense. How you keep 100s of people from ever breaking their silence?

This is the biggest flaw in this whole plan.







118 replies, 14683 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 118 replies Author Time Post
Reply It is this simple regarding 9/11...NO ONE has ever came forward and said 'I was part of it!".... (Original post)
Logical Dec 2011 OP
ottobahn Dec 2011 #1
cpwm17 Dec 2011 #4
stockholmer Aug 2012 #102
cpwm17 Aug 2012 #105
cpwm17 Aug 2012 #107
Quantess Aug 2012 #111
cpwm17 Aug 2012 #112
Logical Dec 2011 #2
ottobahn Dec 2011 #3
Logical Dec 2011 #5
ottobahn Dec 2011 #6
Logical Dec 2011 #7
ottobahn Dec 2011 #8
Logical Dec 2011 #11
ottobahn Dec 2011 #14
cpwm17 Dec 2011 #17
ottobahn Dec 2011 #18
OnTheOtherHand Dec 2011 #21
Logical Dec 2011 #19
chrisa Jan 2012 #38
BlueMidwest Mar 2012 #63
chrisa Jan 2012 #37
Logical Jan 2012 #39
eomer Dec 2011 #9
Logical Dec 2011 #10
eomer Dec 2011 #12
Logical Dec 2011 #13
eomer Dec 2011 #15
ottobahn Dec 2011 #16
Logical Dec 2011 #20
Politicalboi Mar 2012 #56
wildbilln864 Dec 2011 #22
Riftaxe Dec 2011 #23
eomer Dec 2011 #24
Politicalboi Mar 2012 #57
OnTheOtherHand Dec 2011 #25
Riftaxe Jan 2012 #31
OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #32
Politicalboi Mar 2012 #58
Logical Dec 2011 #26
Make7 Dec 2011 #27
zappaman Dec 2011 #28
Logical Dec 2011 #29
wildbilln864 Jan 2012 #30
4dog Jan 2012 #33
cpwm17 Jan 2012 #34
gyroscope Jan 2012 #40
Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #35
4dog Jan 2012 #36
gyroscope Jan 2012 #41
Logical Jan 2012 #42
gyroscope Jan 2012 #43
Logical Jan 2012 #44
zappaman Jan 2012 #45
Logical Jan 2012 #46
gyroscope Jan 2012 #48
gyroscope Jan 2012 #47
Logical Jan 2012 #49
BobbyBoring Feb 2012 #50
RZM Feb 2012 #53
stockholmer Aug 2012 #101
cpwm17 Aug 2012 #106
Politicalboi Mar 2012 #59
zappaman Mar 2012 #60
Ghost in the Machine Feb 2012 #51
Celebration Feb 2012 #52
earcandle Feb 2012 #54
Politicalboi Mar 2012 #55
Shagman Mar 2012 #61
Logical Mar 2012 #64
Shagman Jun 2012 #89
dougolat Sep 2012 #115
BlueMidwest Mar 2012 #62
Rosa Luxemburg Mar 2012 #65
gyroscope May 2012 #66
apocalypsehow May 2012 #67
gyroscope May 2012 #68
apocalypsehow May 2012 #70
gyroscope May 2012 #74
apocalypsehow May 2012 #85
hack89 May 2012 #71
gyroscope May 2012 #73
hack89 May 2012 #77
gyroscope May 2012 #76
hack89 May 2012 #78
gyroscope May 2012 #80
zappaman May 2012 #82
gyroscope May 2012 #83
zappaman May 2012 #84
hack89 May 2012 #86
SoutherDem May 2012 #69
gyroscope May 2012 #75
SoutherDem May 2012 #79
gyroscope May 2012 #81
Why Syzygy May 2012 #72
deadinsider May 2012 #87
deadinsider May 2012 #88
Eddie Haskell Jul 2012 #90
Indi Guy Aug 2012 #91
R.A.R Aug 2012 #92
Frank_Norris_Lives Aug 2012 #93
R.A.R Aug 2012 #95
Frank_Norris_Lives Aug 2012 #96
R.A.R Aug 2012 #109
Frank_Norris_Lives Aug 2012 #110
stockholmer Aug 2012 #100
Frank_Norris_Lives Aug 2012 #113
R.A.R Aug 2012 #94
cpwm17 Aug 2012 #97
Frank_Norris_Lives Aug 2012 #98
cpwm17 Aug 2012 #99
Frank_Norris_Lives Aug 2012 #103
cpwm17 Aug 2012 #104
Frank_Norris_Lives Aug 2012 #108
Indi Guy Sep 2012 #114
PopeOxycontinI Sep 2012 #116
Politicalboi Sep 2012 #117
BB1 Oct 2012 #118

Response to Logical (Original post)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 02:51 PM

1. logical fallacy n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ottobahn (Reply #1)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 03:11 PM

4. What logical fallacy?

In over two words, please explain why this logical fallacy applies.

Then please give a plausible explanation on how 9-11 went down since you seem to believe that it took fewer people than what the OP claims.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cpwm17 (Reply #4)

Tue Aug 14, 2012, 09:33 PM

102. the logical fallacy of argumentum e silentio (argument from silence)

 

where the conclusion is based on the absence of evidence, rather than the existence of evidence

the OP also employs a shifting burden of proof as well

extremely common, and a telltale sign of a truly weak position

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stockholmer (Reply #102)

Wed Aug 15, 2012, 01:54 PM

105. The OP's argument is legitimate.

Common sense should tell anyone that such a massive operation would be exposed. It would be way too complex (actually the conspiracy couldn't be pulled off - exposed or not) to not be exposed.

The burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim. That's why I asked the second question: "please give a plausible explanation on how 9-11 went down since you seem to believe that it took fewer people than what the OP claims."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stockholmer (Reply #102)

Wed Aug 15, 2012, 05:03 PM

107. Well I see that you're not going to be able to ever respond

Bummer

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cpwm17 (Reply #107)

Wed Aug 22, 2012, 04:57 PM

111. Wow... Stockholmer got canned.

Kind of surprising, I guess?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Quantess (Reply #111)

Thu Aug 23, 2012, 02:46 AM

112. I believe it was for accusing the wrong country in a BS Kennedy assassination theory...

...on a forum. Not a good idea.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 02:55 PM

2. LOL......that was a very detailed answer. Thanks!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Reply #2)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 03:02 PM

3. Do you think Homeopathy is a scam? n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ottobahn (Reply #3)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 03:38 PM

5. Yes, most of it. I saw a guy, at a speech, take a whole bottle of "GNC" sleeping pills before the...

speech and one hour later was still talking. Hmmm!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Reply #5)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 04:00 PM

6. So if you believe homeopathy is a scam,

 

how come none of the 100,000s or millions of people involved with it since its inception over 200 years ago ever came forward to admit it was a scam?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ottobahn (Reply #6)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 04:02 PM

7. You do not think I can find consumers of Homeopathy who say it is a scam? Seriously?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Reply #7)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 04:13 PM

8. I'm talking people involved with it that would know it was a scam, not

 

consumers who "think" it is a scam because it may not have worked for them.

I'm talking about people who own and worked at the homeopathic remedy companies, the faculty at the schools who teach it, the doctors trained in it, etc. The people who would know if it was a scam, or not.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ottobahn (Reply #8)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 04:32 PM

11. The difference is that.......

the people making the medicine believe it. So they are not going to say it does not work because they think it works.

That is like me saying ask any working 'psychic' to admit that they really have no powers. They believe they do.

The people who worked on the Manhattan project even leaked secrets. The atomic bomb was leaked to many. You cannot get a large group and keep it quiet for long.

Why has no 9/11 participant came forward to sell his story?

And 9/11 is a much bigger deal than selling herbs at GNC.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Reply #11)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 04:42 PM

14. But if Homeopathy is a scam, there's got to be scammers involved

 

How many of them whistleblowed since homeopathy's inception over 200 years ago?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ottobahn (Reply #14)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 05:04 PM

17. There's no comparison to potential 9-11 conspirators

Homeopathy is out in the open. There are weak laws against their operations. Many people that practice homeopathy actually believe it works, and the rest find it a way to make a quick buck.

Practitioners of homeopathy are a self selected group of people that can easily find other practitioners since they operate in the open.

There is no conceivable way for such a large group of people to get together to commit 9-11. The laws are strong against mass-murder of American citizens. Any attempt would fail, and their cover would be blown.

If I wanted to conspire to commit a 9-11 type attack as truthers claim: Where would I go? Who would I meet? What organization can I find that conducts these types of operations? Do they have a link?

If it was done as a government operation, how would the government find all of the conspirators without their cover being blown? Most people would refuse to take part.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cpwm17 (Reply #17)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 05:08 PM

18. If homeopathy is out in the open, seems more easy to out those who would know it's a scam.

 

Why hasn't any been? That would be a big victory to the anti-homeopathy crowd.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ottobahn (Reply #18)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 05:38 PM

21. how could anyone PROVE that homeopathy is a scam?

Homeopaths claim that their treatments are tailored to individual patients and conditions. Homeopathy is unfalsifiable (which is not a good thing). Presumably one could prove that a particular homeopath didn't believe in the efficacy of his or her own treatments, but that would no more rebut homeopathy than exposing a doctor as a quack rebuts mainstream medicine.

I think homeopathy is a scam in the sense that it has no medical merit, but I don't know that it is a scam in the sense that it depends upon conscious scammers. I suspect that most of its practitioners believe in it. Regardless, no conspiracy is required.

That said, unless someone specifies a particular 9/11 conspiracy scenario, there is no way to know how many people would have to be involved. The general premise that "the Official Story is untrue" is, in fact, unfalsifiable -- and perhaps trivially true, depending on what is meant by "the Official Story."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ottobahn (Reply #14)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 05:17 PM

19. Not a scam as in ripping people off. A scam in it does not work.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ottobahn (Reply #6)

Mon Jan 9, 2012, 01:27 PM

38. It's not the same thing. Homeopathy can rely on the placebo effect.

The people who are involved with it, or actually most of them anyways, actually believe that it works.

On the other hand, a plot to blow something up is obvious. There's no doubt about it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ottobahn (Reply #6)

Fri Mar 23, 2012, 05:39 PM

63. I know

 

Excellent point

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Reply #5)

Mon Jan 9, 2012, 01:25 PM

37. That was James Randi n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to chrisa (Reply #37)

Mon Jan 9, 2012, 01:35 PM

39. Yes it was!! n-t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 04:16 PM

9. I don't think there's much doubt that additional people were involved who have not been revealed.

There are clues and leads that haven't been followed up on that would seem to indicate additional people involved in the funding and coordinating. Who might those people be? Could one or more of them be operatives of our government's covert services? I don't see why not.

There is no reason that having one single US government operative or a small cell of US government operatives involved somehow then means that hundreds or thousands have to be involved. There's no logic to that leap. There certainly could have been a small number of US personnel involved just as easily as a large number.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to eomer (Reply #9)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 04:22 PM

10. So you do not think the whole 9/11 inside job would have taken 100s of people?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Reply #10)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 04:35 PM

12. I'm not sure what you mean by "the whole 9/11 inside job".

If I understand what you're driving at, you're arguing that there was no inside job. So you think the job could have been pulled of with zero people inside our government involved in it.

If you're right then isn't it also feasible for the job to have been pulled off with all the same people whom you believe did it, plus one single operative inside one of our covert services? Or, alternatively, all the same people whom you believe did it, plus some small tight-knit cadre of people from inside our government. For example, Dick Cheney together with two or three CIA operatives?

That latter example would still be an inside job. Why is that theory not viable? It seems to me you're building up this cast of thousands just so you can knock it down. In other words, you seem to be battling a straw man, no?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to eomer (Reply #12)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 04:39 PM

13. My point is that someone would come forward at some point. If people.....

had to hide passengers (or kill them). Or remote control planes or plant explosives in multiple buildings then there are 100s involved.

No one has said "I was part of the plan".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Reply #13)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 05:02 PM

15. OK, so there are some specific scenarios that you think would require hundreds.

And you think those scenarios therefore are unlikely because with hundreds involved you think something would have leaked out.

I'm with you on some of that. I also think that scenarios involving a large number of people being in on the whole plot are unlikely because something would have leaked out.

But I think there are lots of scenarios that involve either a smaller total number of people involved or else a small number of people who knew the true plot combined with a larger number of people who played unwitting roles - who did some part but didn't know why they did it.

For example, creating a diversionary apparatus in the form of training exercises would have involved a large number of people but very few of them would have needed to know the true reason for it. A small number of people at the top could have manipulated the timing and synchronicity of the exercises while all the rest of the actors carried them out unwittingly, thinking they were routine operations.

There are lots of variations on this theme and I think lots of them could have been accomplished with only a small cadre of people who knew the true plan.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Reply #13)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 05:02 PM

16. Neither has anyone involved with the 200+ yr old homeopathy 'scam'

 

according to your logic, Mr. Logical.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ottobahn (Reply #16)

Fri Dec 30, 2011, 05:18 PM

20. A scam in that it does not work. Maybe a placebo effect but that is it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Reply #13)

Sun Mar 11, 2012, 01:35 AM

56. Why not hire international terrorist

That got paid to do the job, and go back home before it all went down. You know Nutinyahoo said "9/11 was good for Israel" could have been some of their guys who have no American connection, and who doesn't like America. And who would believe them? I take it you don't believe it was an inside job, so if someone did come forward, you and the rest would probably call him a nut. If you think about all the things our government didn't do on 9/11 it should make you wonder what did happen.

Why do we spend so much on defense, but yet our biggest defense building gets hit. The Pentagon was hit at about 9:35 am. The second plane hit the second tower at 8:55. So 40 minutes goes by, and the Pentagon doesn't even close down the highway near the Pentagon. If it were a true attack, how did they know that no trucks with explosives was on it's way? Why didn't they set up SAMS on the roof of the Pentagon? How come they didn't protect D.C.? They are after all, a DEFENSE building.

This is why there has been no trial. How does our government explain all the fails that day. How do they explain DNA that was ID'd when they couldn't even reconstruct any of the planes. So human remains are tougher than a Titanium engine or plane debris. Is that what we are suppose to believe?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)


Response to Logical (Original post)

Sat Dec 31, 2011, 04:57 AM

23. I was originally brought to this thread by jury

However, the post i was supposed to judge was thrown into an infinite loop since the post to be judged was deleted by the poster (a very nasty loop, apparently logging out does not cure it!)

So this will be my first post in Creative speculation (the name alone, I have to admire!)

My imagination leads to all things, I am an avid fan of science fiction...however with that i cannot ignore my educational background since before the first page of a SciFi book, I already know it is fiction.

I dearly would love to believe a lot of things that would make the universe a bit more spectacular! (for now the LHC is keeping me more then interested)

In the absence of the broken jury system *infinite loop again*, if asked directly how would those who believe that 9/11 was MIHOP/LIHOP after a decade answer the questions of why there is yet no proof?

To me it really comes down to the difference between a David Weber book (a person whose knowledge of physics is terrible at best!)
and why those who believe the 9/11 was not as it appears is true?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Riftaxe (Reply #23)

Sat Dec 31, 2011, 06:18 AM

24. A couple of thoughts on "why there is yet no proof".

First, there are crimes every day for which there is never "proof". Because I take it you're looking for some single or compact finding that solves the case and eliminates all doubt - a Perry Mason moment as it were. That happens all the time in fiction but not so much in real life.

So there isn't proof of that type but what there is is evidence. Especially for LIHOP there is a lot of evidence that makes a pretty convincing case. It has been established that the Bush cabal had realized that a massive attack on the U.S. would enable them to do some things they really wanted to do. It has been established that they had ample warning. And it has been established that they were determined, stubbornly, to not respond to the warnings. And, finally, they clearly lied afterward about many of the facts including the warnings and their inaction. All these add up to a very strong case of at least LIHOP.

Regarding MIHOP, to some extent the reason there isn't more to go on is because they didn't like where the evidence was leading. When indications were found that funding came from Pakistan and Saudi Arabia they refused to follow those leads and gave us the explanation that it really wasn't necessary to follow the money. That, of course, is an obvious and outrageous lie. Following the money was an essential thread of the investigation, especially the investigation of who the high-level sponsors of the attack were. So if we don't have "proof" of who the sponsors were, it's at least partly because they didn't like who it was pointing to. We have no way of knowing, to date, whether that was just because it was pointing toward allies of the Bush cabal or, even more, was going to implicate the Bush cabal itself, directly, if followed.

I think it's almost certain that more people were involved than have been revealed so far and that therefore there definitely are parts of this story that are true even though "proof" for them hasn't yet been found. Those leads in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia simply have to have involved more than one person in each and those additional people have not yet been found. And there's no "proof" for anyone beyond the 19 perps, yet there obviously would have been more people than that involved in the instigation and planning of the attack.

Clearly there were more people involved than we have found out about. And the Bush cabal seem the most likely suspects to me based on motive, opportunity, circumstantial evidence, and lying about so many things afterward. If I were a juror I would find the sum of the evidence enough to convict G.W. Bush and Dick Cheney in a way similar to the guilty verdict of Scott Peterson, for which there was no "proof", but merely evidence.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to eomer (Reply #24)

Sun Mar 11, 2012, 01:47 AM

57. And the fact that

Rumsfailed announced that the Pentagon "misplaced" 2.3 Trillion dollars on 09/10/01. And the next day 9/11, no questions ever again about the 2.3 Trillion dollars.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Riftaxe (Reply #23)

Sat Dec 31, 2011, 11:42 AM

25. the answers would probably depend on the allegations

As for the physics arguments that the twin towers must have been taken down by CD, I suppose if I believed those arguments, I would construe that they had already been proven, at least by a preponderance of the evidence.

Different allegations entail different implications. As eomer points out, we wouldn't expect to have conclusive proof for (or against) all such implications, even if such proof is obtainable in principle.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OnTheOtherHand (Reply #25)

Sun Jan 1, 2012, 10:29 PM

31. The thing that would prevent that scenario in my mind

is that steel is malleable a long time before it reaches melting, and by that time both towers were the center of attention.

One of the things brought up on the old DU2 board was why there no explosions heard?

Since it was a "cage" design, any explosives strong enough to blow a support, would have certainly propelled debri much further then anything in the videos taken suggest.

That and i am sure it would be loud enough to blow the mic's on the ground at the very least.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Riftaxe (Reply #31)

Sun Jan 1, 2012, 10:42 PM

32. I haven't seen any good reason to believe CD

As to the question why no explosions were heard, you may get the response that explosions were indeed heard, and besides, thermite can be silent. I don't see many attempts to piece such assertions into a plausible explanation of what happened.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OnTheOtherHand (Reply #32)

Sun Mar 11, 2012, 01:56 AM

58. So squibs 30 stories below

The falling debris isn't enough? How do squibs happen 30 stories below if what they say floors dropping caused it. How did those floors cause squibs 30 stories below? Or how come the lobby had all it's windows blown out, but windows above and near the crash site were intact? And a lot of people heard explosions. I think some people got blown out of the building and they didn't jump as thought. When the towers are collapsing, you can see huge beams flying away from the building. If the pancake theory were true, there should have been 50 stories of debris with the center columns still standing. Even their quack demo video shows the center columns standing, but we saw what was really left. The official story is junk science.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Riftaxe (Reply #23)

Sat Dec 31, 2011, 12:06 PM

26. Why in the world would someone alert this OP?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Make7 (Reply #27)

Sat Dec 31, 2011, 12:17 PM

28. yeah, I got called to jury on this post too.

when it is self-deleted it really puts everything out of whack!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Make7 (Reply #27)

Sat Dec 31, 2011, 12:18 PM

29. OK, thanks!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Riftaxe (Reply #23)

Sun Jan 1, 2012, 12:51 PM

30. so sorry for all the trouble.

Was going to make a joke and after thinking about it thought it better to withdraw it. Didn't realize it would cause any problems I do see bringing others to this group to be a good thing though. Welcome to the new dungeon...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)

Mon Jan 9, 2012, 12:38 AM

33. Also, bin Laden said he did not do it

As reported by AP less than a week after the towers fell. Found recently on CNN site also.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 4dog (Reply #33)

Mon Jan 9, 2012, 02:28 AM

34. Osama wasn't a big fan of dying

He only admitted to the crime after he thought he was safe.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cpwm17 (Reply #34)

Mon Jan 9, 2012, 03:00 PM

40. 'OBL wasn't a big fan of dying'

why would anyone for that matter ever come forward to admit they helped murdered 3000 Americans? are they fans of dying?

thats exactly the reason why no one in the govt will ever come forward to admit their role in 9/11. they aren't fans of dying either.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 4dog (Reply #33)

Mon Jan 9, 2012, 02:37 AM

35. Nothing that he said denied his actual role in the attack. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bolo Boffin (Reply #35)

Mon Jan 9, 2012, 01:08 PM

36. This sounds to me like a denial:

OBL: "I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children, and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children, and other people."

OBL's statement and reputation for truthfulness were corroborated by Hamid Gul, former ISI head and OBL colleague, later in September in an interview that can be found on the Washington Times web site.


Incidentally, I am not intending to come to this group and be a pest. I discovered the group accidentally while exploring the new DU3 look and saw a post that I thought needed a comment, though stale.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)

Mon Jan 9, 2012, 03:04 PM

41. Why would anyone ever admit to mass murder?

and have to spend the rest of their life in jail or on death row?

is it normal for murderers to voluntarily come to the police station and say they did it?
especially when they aren't even a suspect? I don't think so.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gyroscope (Reply #41)

Mon Jan 9, 2012, 04:22 PM

42. The conspiracy people say no one knew the whole plan. So maybe a underling would realize they....

did something and come forward.

Does it really matter? It is obvious 9/11 was not carried out by anyone but the 16 hijackers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Reply #42)

Mon Jan 9, 2012, 05:03 PM

43. Yeah right

even if they were to come forward, the govt and the media would simply ignore them.

ever heard of Sibel Edmunds? Edmunds was an FBI employee at the time of the attacks.
she revealed, among other bombshells, that the US govt had been working closely with OBL up to the day of 9/11. the 9/11 commission simply ignored her as did the MSM. she was never called to testify even though she was considered extremely credible and endorsed by prominent members of the house and senate.

edmunds is a member of a whistleblowers group:

http://www.justacitizen.com/



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gyroscope (Reply #43)

Mon Jan 9, 2012, 05:17 PM

44. I can find thousands that will say the hijackers did it. You....

Are living in a world where facts do not matter. Building 7 colkasped from fires! That is all!
People love conspiricys! They are more fun than the truth!
JFK, moon landing, 911, 2012, etc. all the same!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Reply #44)

Mon Jan 9, 2012, 05:20 PM

45. you left out birthers.

they have about as much evidence of their beliefs as so-called "truthers" do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to zappaman (Reply #45)

Mon Jan 9, 2012, 05:28 PM

46. Great point! Fiction is more fun!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to zappaman (Reply #45)

Mon Jan 9, 2012, 06:05 PM

48. Keep beating that strawman to death

so much easier then dealing with reality isn't it?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Reply #44)

Mon Jan 9, 2012, 06:02 PM

47. Keep living in fantasyland

ignorance is bliss isn't it?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gyroscope (Reply #47)

Mon Jan 9, 2012, 06:25 PM

49. LOL......yes, because the world will end in 2012 and JFK is still alive in a hospital wing!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Reply #49)

Fri Feb 3, 2012, 04:37 PM

50. with ELVIS!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BobbyBoring (Reply #50)

Sat Feb 18, 2012, 02:51 PM

53. Don't forget Tupac n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Reply #44)

Tue Aug 14, 2012, 09:23 PM

101. "Building 7 colkasped from fires!"

 



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stockholmer (Reply #101)

Wed Aug 15, 2012, 02:29 PM

106. That's the conclusion of the scientists and engineers that studied the collapse.

Even common sense should tell anyone that the massive fire in building 7 could cause it to collapse. Perhaps you've come up with some new physics that only applies to 9-11 which protects buildings from large fires.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Reply #42)

Sun Mar 11, 2012, 03:08 AM

59. It is obvious 9/11 was not carried out by anyone but the 16 hijackers.

So we're to believe that 16 "terrorist" who live in a cave fooled our military for hours, flew over military bases, when all they had to do was book a flight out of NY's JFK were the towers were visible. They were supposedly pilots, and mingled with the crew, so it would have been easy for them. And waited till the plane got speed and altitude, took over the plane, and crashed into the towers? Why risk getting shot down over military bases. If this was a well planned operation, they knew the risks. Why not take the easy one?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Politicalboi (Reply #59)

Sun Mar 11, 2012, 12:20 PM

60. There were 19 hijackers

You might want to learn the most basic of facts before tackling the ones you really don't know about.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)

Tue Feb 14, 2012, 05:22 AM

51. So, You've talked to every person in the world and came to this conclusion?

10 years later, NOT ONE of these people has come forward, felt guilty or told a friend/lover about their part in this plan?


Where do you come up with this conclusion? Where is your proof that NOT ONE of these people has come forward, felt guilty or told a friend/lover about their part in this plan?

A couple of years ago, I had a few white supremacists bragging about helping plant explosives in the towers. It was a way for them to hit the "ZOG" {Zionist Occupied Government} where it hurt, and usher in "the day of the rope", which is their dream of taking over the Government. They were very loud, vocal and brash about it, in a public setting at an indoor flea market, with hundreds of people around. Strangely, within a period of about 5-6 weeks, all four were dead.. 2 in separate motorcycle accidents, the other two together in a single vehicle crash. All late at night, on isolated roads.

I know, it was all just a coincidence, right?


Peace,
Ghost

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ghost in the Machine (Reply #51)

Fri Feb 17, 2012, 06:16 AM

52. really, that is interesting!

Is there an internet page somewhere about it, with links to their death notices, and witness accounts of their statements?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)

Sun Feb 19, 2012, 04:06 AM

54. maybe it was the team that did the tight rope walk years ago. Maybe this was a ten year plan. They

managed access where it was supposed to be secure. And bragged about it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)

Sun Mar 11, 2012, 01:12 AM

55. Because with this crowd

They would be laughed at. Just look at us. Some of us don't believe the governments story, and we get laughed at. Who would believe them, when people believe that fire can take down steel and concrete at 10 stories a second. Never happened before, and has never happened again. And WTC 7 never got hit by anything other than debris, if that is even true. They would be talking to a WALL. And I would say welcome to DU.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)

Thu Mar 22, 2012, 01:47 PM

61. a little context

Did anyone ever come forward to "confess" to the Iran-Contra scheme? Do members of organized crime ever spontaneously admit they've broken the law? Any conspiracy on this scale wouldn't have sprung into being overnight, it would be an operation put forward, handled, and kept quiet by people who do that sort of thing every day. Is it a coincidence that GHW Bush was once head of the CIA?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Shagman (Reply #61)

Fri Mar 23, 2012, 11:05 PM

64. Duh! Many mobsters have written books! People leaked the Manhattan Project! The...

Iran Contra project was discovered.

Your examples are horrible!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Reply #64)

Fri Jun 1, 2012, 10:41 AM

89. another source

Another opinion, well informed, from Russ Baker: "Someone Would Have Talked? Someone Would Be Crazy."

WhoWhatWhy

There are mechanisms in place to intimidate or neutralize whistle-blowers. Believing otherwise simply ignores the depths to which human nature can sink, as well as the way expediency can become ingrained in bureaucracy.

Also, reflexively assuming that conspiracies never happen is just as narrow-minded as assuming they always do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Shagman (Reply #89)

Sun Sep 9, 2012, 05:07 AM

115. Excellent link, thank you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)

Fri Mar 23, 2012, 05:38 PM

62. aagreed

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)

Sat Mar 24, 2012, 12:38 AM

65. no one owned up yet

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Reply #65)

Sat May 5, 2012, 10:08 PM

66. Again. Why would anyone ever admit to being part of a mass murder?

and risk a life in prison?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gyroscope (Reply #66)

Sun May 6, 2012, 06:47 PM

67. You keep asking this paired set of rhetorical questions as if it means anythings or proves something

Hint: it doesn't. There was no wider conspiracy on 9/11, no MIHOP or LIHOP or any of that jazz. We know who committed the crime(s) that day, and why. Case closed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to apocalypsehow (Reply #67)

Mon May 7, 2012, 01:40 PM

68. You wish

It's a simple, legitimate question. Why can't you answer a simple question?

Because you know it destroys your ridiculous fairy tale.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gyroscope (Reply #68)

Tue May 8, 2012, 12:50 PM

70. I "wish" nothing, for the facts are on my side, not yours. It really is that simple. n/t.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to apocalypsehow (Reply #70)

Sat May 12, 2012, 05:31 AM

74. You have offered no facts

only wishful thinking.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gyroscope (Reply #74)

Sun May 13, 2012, 02:37 AM

85. Uh-huh. n/t.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gyroscope (Reply #66)

Wed May 9, 2012, 09:11 AM

71. Why not a deathbed confession? nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hack89 (Reply #71)

Sat May 12, 2012, 05:27 AM

73. You been watching too many Hollywood movies

real life doesn't work like it does in the movies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gyroscope (Reply #73)

Sat May 12, 2012, 07:30 AM

77. That's funny - massive secret government conspiracies are a staple of Hollywood movies

so you are right - real life doesn't work like it does in the movies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hack89 (Reply #71)

Sat May 12, 2012, 05:51 AM

76. Who would they confess to?

their wife? good luck with that. a confession is meaningless unless it is conducted in front of a judge in a court of law. but the case has long been closed anyway, so that will never happen. the word of the wife means nothing, if she even decides to tell anyone what her husband just confessed to her. her second-hand information is worth even less than her dying husband's word. who would believe her? why would the dying perp even want to confess in the first place and have his family's name and reputation forever tarnished and associated with those who planned and carried out 9/11?? this deathbed confession nonsense is really quite laughable. which is why it only happens in the movies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to hack89 (Reply #78)

Sat May 12, 2012, 06:52 PM

80. Meaningless speculation

and wishful thinking.

the government and mainstream media have completely ignored the testimony of people such as Sibel Edmunds, Barry Jennings, and a host of others. if a deathbed confession were to ever take place do you think there would be any chance of them bothering to report it? keep dreaming. it only happens in the movies.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gyroscope (Reply #80)

Sat May 12, 2012, 08:15 PM

82. Too funny!

Are you really so unaware of the irony of your posts?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to zappaman (Reply #82)

Sat May 12, 2012, 08:50 PM

83. And in your world

people who take part in mass murders always eventually 'fess up to it, for no apparent reason. even when they are under no pressure to do so and the perps have already been decided on. now that it is truly hilarious.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gyroscope (Reply #83)

Sat May 12, 2012, 10:11 PM

84. No, in my world

when someone makes an assertion about what would be the biggest conspiracy in the history of the world, they at least try to back them up with facts.
Get back to us when you get some, eh?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gyroscope (Reply #80)

Sun May 13, 2012, 08:23 AM

86. You just broke my irony meter

Sibel Edmunds is not a Truther - she says the FBI ignored credible evidence that Bin Laden was planing a massive terrorist attack in America.

There is evidence that Barry Jennings got his times mixed up and the "explosions" were due to the collapse of the towers. The man that was with him tells a different story for one thing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)

Tue May 8, 2012, 12:17 AM

69. I agree

By now someone would have been guilt ridden, on their death bed, have found religion or wanted to turn a buck. Washington is a sieve for secrets, they can't keep the little things secret much less something this big, supposed to be known by so many for so long.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SoutherDem (Reply #69)

Sat May 12, 2012, 05:36 AM

75. You watch a lot of movies?

you have a very vivid imagination.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gyroscope (Reply #75)

Sat May 12, 2012, 11:04 AM

79. Why?

You haven't heard of this happening? Greed and Guilt brings many skeletons out of the closet.

But, do I believe the "Loose Change" answers. NO!

But, in additions to the 1000's of people being involved, for their answers to fit would take such execution the chances of the plan working seem unlikely.

Am I saying, Bush isn't responsible for being arrogant for thinking it could never happen to us, for completely ignoring the dangers which were present, or for that matter discarding a plan which Clinton had in place which Gore is likely to have continued which may have stopped the attack? NO!

If I am understanding you and you do believe the "Loose Change" theories. Maybe it is you who watches too many movies and you are the one with the vivid imagination.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SoutherDem (Reply #79)

Sat May 12, 2012, 06:56 PM

81. You can speculate about deathbed confessions until the cows come home

but its really just your desperation talking.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)

Wed May 9, 2012, 03:53 PM

72. How many are dead

or unaccounted for? Start with even a simple list of the eye witnesses. If 90% of them are dead, does that change your theory? If not, then how can you say NO ONE has come forward, not knowing if one of the dead ones would have/did?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)

Thu May 17, 2012, 04:03 AM

87. But there are plenty of witnesses...

 

First off, let's start with the Franklin Conspiracy: it is absolutely obvious that there are elements outside of our normal acceptance of the big U.S.A. we learn in elementary school.



Discredit and destroy their academic reputation.
Don't publish their testimonies.
Blackmail: see Franklin Conspiracy.
Death threats

Off the top of my head.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Logical (Original post)

Sat Jul 28, 2012, 06:45 PM

90. No one who's still alive.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)

Wed Aug 1, 2012, 08:36 PM

91. Proof Positive of an Insider coming Forward!...

Last edited Thu Aug 16, 2012, 04:30 PM - Edit history (1)

For the intellectually honest and curious -- very many of your answers can be found here:



(watch on Youtube & check out all 8 segments)

Also see -- http://www.democraticunderground.com/11353298


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)

Thu Aug 9, 2012, 07:19 PM

92. Why would it have taken "100s" or "1000s" to "pull off"?

I would suggest that this assumption is absolutely false.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to R.A.R (Reply #92)

Fri Aug 10, 2012, 09:35 AM

93. Yes, you're right!

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has." - Margaret Mead.

but on the other hand.......

""Planning the attacks was a master deed, in technical and organizational terms. To hijack four big airliners within a few minutes and fly them into targets within a single hour and doing so on complicated flight routes! That is unthinkable, without backing from the secret apparatuses of state and industry." - Andreas von Bulow, former FRG minister.

....so maybe 19 middle-easterners is not enough after all....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Frank_Norris_Lives (Reply #93)

Fri Aug 10, 2012, 06:20 PM

95. A person could probably find a quote to support, or deny, anything.

That's why it may be best to do your own thinking.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to R.A.R (Reply #95)

Mon Aug 13, 2012, 03:58 AM

96. Hmmmmm.....I was thinking....

..that by throwing out two opposites that someone might realize that they can, this case, both be true. Any effort has a core of dedicated individuals but that does not negate their far-reaching machinations. I definitely am of Bulow's viewpoint, too many things worked in favor of the hijackers for coincidence. But how many needed to know the full picture? Outside of the core I would argue, few. Many individuals/agencies unknowingly abetted while some individuals at agencies knowingly abetted.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Frank_Norris_Lives (Reply #96)

Sat Aug 18, 2012, 07:45 PM

109. "too many things worked in favor of the hijackers for coincidence"

too many things worked in favor of the hijackers for coincidence

F_N_L, please go into this further. What are some examples?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to R.A.R (Reply #109)

Mon Aug 20, 2012, 11:03 AM

110. I can think of these coincidences without digging too far...

1. Significant air exercises, not necessarily linked to each other, are scheduled for 11 Sep.
2. The alleged hijackers just happen to pick that day to execute.
3. Warnings of attacks using planes come in from several other countries' intel agencies - bureaucratic ineptitude prevents any response
4. Warnings of attacks using planes come in from the Pentagon's 'Able Danger' task force - again - bureaucratic ineptitude prevents any response
5. The same airport security company handled security for Dulles, Newark & Logan
6. No hijacking signals were sent from any of the four planes
7. The 'Unseen Hand' - Even though the planes (I believe all four) took off late and there was no way for the alleged hijackers to communicate once off the ground, the first three planes all execute a sequential attack, i.e. the second plane doesn't deviate from its course until the first one is on its final approach, the third plane doesn't deviate from course until the second plane is on its final approach.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to R.A.R (Reply #92)

Tue Aug 14, 2012, 09:20 PM

100. +100000000 It is all about compartmentalisation, For instance, Able Danger, IMHO was patsy control,

 

not just for 9-11, but for the vast bulk of latent operatives from a multitude of schema set up both inside and outside the US. You task a group (Able Danger in this case) with a supposed objective, then use the data they obtain for the true, secondary purpose, without their knowledge. The CIA, NSA, etc, have a vast, global network of both artificially created and organic actors for thousands of different contingencies at their fingertips.

The only true 'conspiracy theory' (oh how I hate those words, they are a true refuge of a feeble, sheep-like mind) is the official story.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stockholmer (Reply #100)

Thu Aug 23, 2012, 03:24 AM

113. How about if we call it......

'Collusion Analysis' ?

We the People, in order to secure better understanding of the criminal conspiracies we face, do hereby accept conspiracy as a common fact of local, regional, national and international criminal machinations. Therefore, let us identify and analyze the criminal collusion of common interests and punish those persons who have caused harm.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)

Fri Aug 10, 2012, 11:32 AM

94. A person who would state that "100s" or "1000s" would be required, hasn't given it much thought.

And THAT'S the real problem.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to R.A.R (Reply #94)

Mon Aug 13, 2012, 09:35 PM

97. OK, then here's your chance to give a plausible explanation on how 9-11 went down.

Go for it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cpwm17 (Reply #97)

Tue Aug 14, 2012, 11:52 AM

98. Ok! Let me creatively speculate that.....

1. Most of the account of "Collateral Damage: U.S. Covert Operations and the Terrorist Attacks on
September 11, 2001" is true. Destroying the trail of evidence and crashing the US financial system until the Fed resets it. This is the motive and helps to explain why the Office of Naval Intelligence in the Pentagon was hit and not the White House (which surely should have been the target of whichever plane reached Washington first).

2. A cover operation of Arab hijackers was developed (strung-along patsies) and the planes were remote-controlled in (Flt 93 took off 25 min. late and lost it's operational window and was put down on purpose).

3. Some destructive mechanism was used inside the towers that melted cars 5 blocks away, created particles far smaller than can be explained through pulverization, caused two separate 'tubular cages' to burrow down some 70+ stories through their larger and more stable bottoms and burned in the rubble for 3 months.

4. We're back in Eurasia and War's On!

In view all we know about the CIA via drug running, arms smuggling, their wall street origins, sure, it's plausible. What's 3,000 lives in a world of 6 billion with Eurasia at stake?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Frank_Norris_Lives (Reply #98)

Tue Aug 14, 2012, 04:51 PM

99. You make vague assertions

and provide little evidence or details on how 9-11 went down.

Your operation would take thousands of people to pull off and could never be accomplished. It would be exposed very easily and quickly, before it ever got off the ground. No sane person would ever take part - let alone thousands.

The simple hijacking and crashing of airliners into the towers and Pentagon could be accomplished with very few people. And that is what all of the evidence supports.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cpwm17 (Reply #99)

Wed Aug 15, 2012, 05:58 AM

103. Look at the Iran-Contra affair.....

....a conspiracy that was planned and executed over almost a year and a half, involved dozens & dozens of persons, if not several hundred, in a half-dozen countries. NOBODY said anything about this conspiracy until Eugen Hasenfuss was shot down.

Your assertion that people, and lots of them, can't keep a secret, doesn't hold.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Frank_Norris_Lives (Reply #103)

Wed Aug 15, 2012, 01:37 PM

104. Still Iran-Contra was exposed

and Iran-Contra was many orders of magnitude less complex and, from an American perspective, many orders of magnitude less evil.

The negative consequences for the Iran-Contra conspirators were small. Oliver North was actually made a hero by the dumb fucks on the right. What do you think would happen if a 9-11 conspirator was exposed - made a hero?

It's impossible to assembly all of the necessary experts to pull off a 9-11 inside job. Most people would go to the police if asked to take part in mass murder against their own citizens. The politicians themselves don't have such expertise. In fact, no one has the expertise to pull off a 9-11 type inside job.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cpwm17 (Reply #104)

Thu Aug 16, 2012, 04:48 AM

108. Still, it was exposed by accident...

wasn't it? Nobody was talking.

My old scoutmaster was the McDonnell Douglas International Sales Manager for the F4 at that time. I later asked him if Mac was supplying the parts and he said no, Israel was counterfeiting them. This fellow was once a navy test pilot and John Glenn's roomate at one time. Very patriotic. And he never spoke up although he knew something was amiss. He didn't know the full picture at the time. But still, he didn't open his mouth about the piece he had.

Two old friends of mine are pastors and they abhor conspiracy theory (I prefer to call it Collusion Analysis), always saying, 'Nobody would be so evil.' Hah! I find that a strange response coming from a pastor but whatever. Individuals and groups follow their self-interests. When it gets extreme, we call it evil. But it is certainly there.

Operation Northwoods contemplated killing Americans. We now know of US government medical experimentation on unsuspecting Americans. There are plenty of people in the right circles available for something like 9-11. As we slowly and painfully learn over decades, such individuals have always been in or around our government.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)

Sun Sep 9, 2012, 04:39 AM

114. It is this simple regarding 9/11...NO ONE has ever came forward and said 'I was part of it!"....

Simply not true. I posted this in this group -- "Former CIA Asset (Turned Whistleblower) - Susan Lindauer Comes Clean Re: Fed Involvement in 9/11..." -- http://www.democraticunderground.com/11353298

...and I posted this in this very thread -- 91. "Proof Positive of an Insider coming Forward!..." -- http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1135&pid=3300

Anyone care to respond?


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)

Tue Sep 11, 2012, 04:45 AM

116. LIHOP...

Would not require near as many people as MIHOP. Another thing to consider is that to get
into a position with real pull in almost any large organization these days,
corporate or government, you have to be a sociopath or one real brainwashed
fucking sheep.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)

Tue Sep 11, 2012, 10:14 PM

117. It wouldn't take 100's or 1000's, just PNAC and crew and a death pledge

Just common sense. How did our government react after 9/11. When the Pentagon shows us the ONLY proof of the attack in a blurry video and we all accept it, why would we believe someone who knows what really happen. People like you would just say they are just "truthers". People like you are the ones who believe steel and concrete collapse due to fire at 10 stories a second. How can we help you believe that it can't? Why WTC7? No plane hit it. There was also the other WTC's that didn't collapse that were closer to towers 1 and 2. And a shit load of debris fell on those.

But if I were ever convicted of a crime, and the video they showed me was blurry and it wasn't even me, should I accept their "evidence"? Or should fight it? Why aren't we fighting to find the truth. Those that fight, get called names, and aren't taken seriously. Why are we taking their word? These are the same assholes that brought us into war over lies. I don't accept the Pentagon video as evidence. It shows us NOTHING.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Original post)

Thu Oct 18, 2012, 06:11 AM

118. Lance Armstrong makes the case, I think.

A massive conspiracy to cheat and cover up. The game was on for over 15 years. Hundreds of people were involved, many bribed or threathened. The people who came forward on foul play were ridiculed, blacklisted, humiliated and outcast.

Why? Not for the act of cheating in itself, but for massive gains. If there's enough money to be made, people will turmn a blind eye to anything.

And here comes the parallel.
Suggestions, accusations and suspicions ran wild. Outers were prosecuted. Everybody took dope, except for Lance Armstrong, the great hero.
In the end, it turned out he bribed officials, blackmailed team mates and cheated from the beginning.

I never believed Armstrong was clean. The official story never convinced me. Too many gaps, too many loose ends, too many people involved.
Same goes for the 9/11 official report. Too many unanswered questions, too little evidence to support the government stance.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread