Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 04:13 PM Jan 2016

The new energy trajectory in the Southeast

The new energy trajectory in the Southeast
December 30, 2015


Carbon dioxide emissions dropped 29 percent throughout the region between 2005-2013, even while population in the Southeast rose 10 percent. (© SELC)
Cutting coal

Ten years ago, there were 246 coal-fired units generating electric power in our region, and nine more huge units were planned. Coal-fired power accounted for the South’s outsized contribution to climate change and emitted enormous amounts of soot-forming sulfur dioxide, smog-forming nitrogen dioxide, and nearly 100 percent of the mercury, arsenic, and selenium contaminating our waterways.

Today, 126 of the existing units—a third of the total coal capacity in our six states—are slated for retirement by around 2020; most of them are already closed. And seven of the proposed units never got off the ground.

SELC has been deeply involved in this revolution, securing plans or legally binding retirement commitments and turning aside most of the proposed new plants, while ensuring that the two that were built burn as cleanly as possible. These developments played a major role in reducing emissions from electric power generation in our region down 29 percent between 2005 and 2013—even as the population of the Southeast increased by an estimated 10 percent.

These changes have come without increasing the average home electricity bill. And despite all the rhetoric, most of our states are already well on their way to meeting their goals under the Environmental Protection Agency’s historic Clean Power Plan, the first-ever limits on electricity-sector CO2.

Much of this progress came from applying an economic principle in the courtroom. SELC figured if we could force utilities to pay the true costs of a coal-based energy system—what economists call internalizing cost—we could create powerful incentives to close coal plants.

We also had the legal expertise to make sure that coal-fired power plants included all the pollution control technology required by law and met the strictest environmental standards....
https://www.southernenvironment.org/news-and-press/news-feed/the-souths-new-energy-trajectory
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The new energy trajectory in the Southeast (Original Post) kristopher Jan 2016 OP
They appear to have a somewhat inflated view of their own role FBaggins Jan 2016 #1

FBaggins

(26,696 posts)
1. They appear to have a somewhat inflated view of their own role
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 09:16 PM
Jan 2016

No doubt it's valuable... but a massive economic downturn, shift to natural gas, and substantial increases in nuclear capacity - each play a larger role than they do.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»The new energy trajectory...