Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,516 posts)
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 05:19 PM Nov 2015

Oops! Deepwater Horizon Dispersants Backfired

Oops! Deepwater Horizon Dispersants Backfired

They were supposed to help microbes digest oil, but ended up suppressing the oil-degrading species instead.

Reuters
Ed Yong
| 3:00 PM ET

On 20 April, 2010, an explosion tore through Deepwater Horizon, an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico. Over the next three months, the exposed wellhead released some 750 million liters of oil into the Gulf.

To cope with the record-breaking volumes of oil, authorities decided to dump 7 million liters of a dispersant called Corexit into the Gulf. This substance would break the oil slick into smaller clumps, preventing it from washing onto beaches, or clogging the fur and feathers of coastal wildlife. The smaller particles would also be easier fodder for oil-digesting microbes, which have evolved to break down hydrocarbons that naturally seep from oceanic vents.

But a new study by Samantha Joye at the University of Georgia shows that, at least in terms of the latter goal, the dispersants failed miserably.

By simulating the Deepwater spill in their laboratory, Joye's team found that the dispersants actually suppressed oil-busting bacteria and slowed their ability to degrade oil. Instead, they favored microbes that, well, excel at digesting dispersants.

More:
http://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2015/11/oops-deepwater-horizon-dispersants-backfired/414846/

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
3. They didnt screw up, they knew just what Corexit does, its owned by a bunch of former BP Directors.
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 05:54 PM
Nov 2015

They wanted to sink the oil out of sight to save on the fine per barrel of oil that would be levied against them. they could have sucked much of it up, but then it could be counted. They only care about $$$$$, not the people and animals that have died because they chose this crap. They knew that the Herring population crashed 6 years after spraying it for the Exxon Valdez since the Corexit makes them sterile and also mutates the species it comes in contact with. Now that crap is all over the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico being consumed up the food chain. I live on the Gulf and now cannot eat the local seafood.

The tar balls are deadly for those with weakened immune systems or open wounds that come into contact with it. Most of the injured/sick from the spill are denied compensation after they fill out the 21 page claim form, no matter what their doctor says.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
13. Ya, I had the misfortune of being on top of the news at the time
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 09:33 PM
Nov 2015

And a lot of people sounded the alarm on the the Corexit, and it was done anyway. The gov't colluded with BP to understate the disaster for various reasons as well. Obama's plan was to ask us to "pray" after we protested the deepwater drilling and he assured us he was on top of it.

A disaster of disasters.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
4. And people don't understand WHY I don't trust any Large Corporation to tell the truth,
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 06:02 PM
Nov 2015

especially the Oil Industry, and Monsanto.

Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)
5. Didn't they recently come to an agreement on how much the fines would be to BP?
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 06:18 PM
Nov 2015

Surely, this new information would have made quite a difference in the total, not that it would matter. None of us will live long enough to see that paid in full.

eppur_se_muova

(36,259 posts)
6. The purpose of dispersants was to make oil less visible -- out of sight, out of mind.
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 06:34 PM
Nov 2015

Like shit swept under the rug, it hasn't really gone away -- you just can't see it without trying.

Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
10. Oil dispersants can suppress natural oil-degrading microorganisms, new study shows
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 07:27 PM
Nov 2015
https://news.uga.edu/releases/article/oil-dispersants-can-suppress-natural-oil-degrading-microorganisms-1115/
[font face=Serif][font size=5]Oil dispersants can suppress natural oil-degrading microorganisms, new study shows[/font]

November 9, 2015
Writer: Alan Flurry
Contact: Samantha B. Joye

[font size=3]Athens, GA. - The use of chemical dispersants meant to stimulate microbial crude oil degradation can in some cases inhibit the microorganisms that naturally degrade hydrocarbons, according to a new study led by University of Georgia marine scientists. Their findings are based on laboratory-simulated conditions that mimic Gulf of Mexico deep waters immediately following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

The study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, examined microbial oil degradation in the Deepwater plume, simulating oil concentrations and dispersants concentrations observed during the incident. The team found that the presence of dispersants significantly altered the microbial composition of Gulf deep water by promoting the growth of Colwellia, a group of microorganisms capable of dispersant degradation.

However, when oil alone was added to parallel samples in the absence of chemical dispersants, the growth of natural hydrocarbon-degrading Marinobacter was stimulated.

"These compelling results show the naturally occurring communities of oil-degrading microorganisms, especially Marinobacter, are quite proficient at degrading oil and that oil biodegradation was more efficient in the absence of chemical dispersants," said the study's lead author Samantha Joye, Georgia Athletic Association Professor of Arts and Sciences.

…[/font][/font]
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1507380112
 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
11. Maybe they should make tea from worm castings, pour it on the spill. Might just eat it.
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 07:57 PM
Nov 2015

Probably better than this crap.

Better would be to find another energy source before we have to.

Kokonoe

(2,485 posts)
12. My guess is it just makes oil sink.
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 08:27 PM
Nov 2015

why else would they disperse it.

Its not for saving dolphins, or other life.

hatrack

(59,583 posts)
14. It's to limit federal fines, which are calculated on a per-barrel basis
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 09:49 PM
Nov 2015

Out of sight, off of ledger.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Oops! Deepwater Horizon D...