Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 12:05 PM Feb 2012

States, Apparently Believing the Wind Makes Their Pollution Disappear, Sue to Block EPA Smog Rules


aka, another excellent argument for federal regulation.

"Today 16 states and numerous power companies that oppose new pollution-reduction rules must file their petitions with the U.S. Court of Appeals in D.C. In response to their initial suit, the court granted a motion to temporarily “stay,” or halt, the implementation of the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, or smog pollution rule, which the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, promulgated last summer. These “good neighbor” pollution-reduction standards will require power plants to slash their sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide pollution. These substances are the key ingredients in acid rain and smog, and they can travel hundreds of miles and contaminate other states.

Once implemented the rule will annually save thousands of lives and prevent thousands of illnesses. Not surprisingly, the 16 states that sued EPA to block these rules include 7 of the 10 highest-polluting states in the country. And their governors and attorneys general, who decide whether to file a lawsuit to stop these safeguards, received a combined $5 million in campaign contributions from big utilities and coal companies that benefit from higher-pollution levels.

This column reviews the rule and its benefits as well as the efforts of utilities and coal companies to block it so they can avoid or postpone investments in cleanup technology. EPA analysis demonstrates that the law’s benefits to public health and the environment are much greater than its costs. These governors and attorneys general should support EPA’s efforts to protect the residents of their states and people downwind from premature death, asthma attacks, and other respiratory ailments instead of bending to the will of dirty-money donors."

http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2012/02/csapr_contributions.html

Dirty Money Donors: a list of the states with the largest contributions to state officials by the coal and utility industries:

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
States, Apparently Believing the Wind Makes Their Pollution Disappear, Sue to Block EPA Smog Rules (Original Post) wtmusic Feb 2012 OP
Ohio is home to employee-killer mine-owner Robert Murray, owner of Murray Coal Kolesar Feb 2012 #1

Kolesar

(31,182 posts)
1. Ohio is home to employee-killer mine-owner Robert Murray, owner of Murray Coal
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 02:16 PM
Feb 2012

Cleveland's largest newspaper is a big promoter of coal.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»States, Apparently Believ...