HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Environment & Energy » Environment & Energy (Group) » FDA says ‘frankenfish’ sa...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Fri Dec 21, 2012, 06:35 PM

FDA says ‘frankenfish’ salmon would not harm environment, clears way for approval




By Associated Press, Updated: Friday, December 21, 5:10 PM

WASHINGTON — Federal health regulators say a genetically modified salmon that grows twice as fast as normal is unlikely to harm the environment, clearing the way for the first approval of a scientifically engineered animal for human consumption.

The Food and Drug Administration on Friday released its environmental assessment of the AquaAdvantage salmon, a faster-growing fish which has been subject to a contentious, yearslong debate at the agency. The document concludes that the fish “will not have any significant impacts on the quality of the human environment of the United States.” Regulators also said that the fish is unlikely to harm populations of natural salmon, a key concern for environmental activists.

The FDA will take comments from the public on its report for 60 days before making it final.

The FDA said more than two years ago that the fish appears to be safe to eat, but the agency had taken no public action since then. Executives for the company behind the fish, Maynard, Mass.-based Aquabounty, speculated that the government was delaying action on their application due to push-back from groups who oppose genetically modified food animals.

more

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/fda-says-frankenfish-salmon-would-not-harm-environment-clears-way-for-approval/2012/12/21/f83af952-4b8d-11e2-8758-b64a2997a921_story.html

2 replies, 543 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 2 replies Author Time Post
Reply FDA says ‘frankenfish’ salmon would not harm environment, clears way for approval (Original post)
n2doc Dec 2012 OP
eppur_se_muova Dec 2012 #1
nenagh Dec 2012 #2

Response to n2doc (Original post)

Fri Dec 21, 2012, 06:39 PM

1. I'm sure nothing could possibly go wrong.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to n2doc (Original post)

Fri Dec 21, 2012, 06:47 PM

2. "the FDA will take comments from the public ... for 60 days before making it final"

Good... I intend to comment..

and i'll be damned if I will eat salmon ever again...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread