HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Environment & Energy » Environment & Energy (Group) » 'Powerships' May Replace ...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 09:47 AM

'Powerships' May Replace South Korea's Offline Nuclear Reactors

More nuclear being replaced with fossil fuels.

Floating power plants offer a unique solution to South Korea's possible power shortages after the country shut down nuclear reactors containing uncertified parts.

The four "powerships" from Turkey can each produce about 150 megawatts of power for South Korea if the Korean government goes ahead with plans to rent them. That would make up for the expected power shortage this coming winter a shortage resulting from the shutdown of two reactors at the Yeonggwang nuclear power plant which were discovered to have parts with forged certificates, according to The Chosun Ilbo.

That would not represent the first job for the powerships, which can turn either heavy fuel oil or natural gas into electricity. Turkey's Karadeniz Energy Group has built and deployed five of the ships since 2010 as part of its "Power of Friendship" project to help power-deprived regions of the Middle East, Africa and Asia.

...

Karadeniz plans to complete building five more powerships by the end of 2013 to boost its fleet power capacity over 2,000 megawatts approximately enough to power 2 million U.S. homes.

http://www.livescience.com/24628-powerships-korea-nuclear-reactors.html

3 replies, 478 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 3 replies Author Time Post
Reply 'Powerships' May Replace South Korea's Offline Nuclear Reactors (Original post)
phantom power Nov 2012 OP
NickB79 Nov 2012 #1
phantom power Nov 2012 #2
NoOneMan Nov 2012 #3

Response to phantom power (Original post)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 02:23 PM

1. To be fair, they really don't have many options

Parts with forged certificates in a reactor are nothing to screw around with, IMO.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NickB79 (Reply #1)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 02:49 PM

2. I agree, shutdown was the responsible thing

just... you know. More carbon.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NickB79 (Reply #1)

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 02:52 PM

3. Yeah. Reducing consumption of energy is not viable

 

How would the infinite growth machine roll on without its three squares a day?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread