Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,583 posts)
Sat Oct 20, 2012, 11:50 AM Oct 2012

Permian Extinction Data Shows Sea Surface Temps May Have Reached 104F Or Higher - Live Science

EDIT

he researchers analyzed strange eel-like creatures known as conodonts, which are known mainly by their elaborate mouthparts. The fossils came from the Nanpanjiang Basin in south China, helping reconstruct what temperatures were like around the equator at the end-Permian. Different groups of conodonts shed light on what temperatures were at different depths. For instance, one group, Neospathodus, lived down about 230 feet (70 meters) deep, while others, such as Pachycladina, Parachirognathus and Platyvillosus lived near the surface.

"We had to go through several tons of rock to look at tiny conodont fossils," Wignall said. "People always thought the end-Permian extinctions were related to temperature increases, but they never measured the temperature then in much detail before, since it involves a lot of hard work looking at these microfossils."

The fruits of this labor? "We've got a case of extreme global warming, the most extreme ever seen in the last 600 million years," Wignall said. "We think the main reason for the dead zone after the end-Permian is a very hot planet, particularly in equatorial parts of the world." [The Harshest Environments on Earth]

The upper part of the ocean may have reached about 100 degrees F (38 degrees C), and sea-surface temperatures may have exceeded 104 degrees F (40 degrees C). For comparison, today's average annual sea-surface temperatures around the equator are 77 to 86 degrees F (25 to 30 degrees C). "Photosynthesis starts to shut down at about 35 degrees C [95 degrees F], and plants often start dying at temperatures above 40 degrees C [104 degrees F]," Wignall said. "This would explain why there's not much fossil record of plants at the end-Permian— for instance, there are no peat swamps forming, no coal-forming whatsoever. This was a huge, devastating extinction."

EDIT

http://www.livescience.com/24091-extreme-global-warming-mass-extinction.html

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
5. Unlikely to happen in today's world, TBH.
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 12:18 AM
Oct 2012

Still, though, better to be safe than sorry in another millenium or so.

That's why we need to act now.

Systematic Chaos

(8,601 posts)
6. Dude, it could just go up maybe 5-10 degrees Fahrenheit from right now, and we'd be FUCKED.
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 12:42 AM
Oct 2012

We don't need 104 degrees to do it when 90-95 will work just fine.

Oh, and "another millennium" my sweet flowery butt.

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
7. We wouldn't be fucked totally. Reduced significantly? Very possibly. But totally fucked? Nope.
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 12:58 AM
Oct 2012

And, I'd like to point out that the Permian extinction, as bad as it was, played out over some centuries, not just a few years.

So, if a somewhat comparable scenario were to start, in another century or two, we likely wouldn't see the full effects for some time, so that's what I meant by a millenium.

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
8. If the average global temperature goes up by 6° F this century, we are indeed fucked.
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 02:54 AM
Oct 2012

Not extinction-level fucked, but certainly dieoff-level fucked. Six degrees is well within the realm of possibility by the end of this century. It's all well and good saying that the Permian extinction unfolded over centuries, but it's not a useful comparison if our temperature gets to the same point in a single century.

The problem is that food crops will start dying off well before that point is reached, as temperatures cross the 40° C threshold in more places, more often, for longer periods of time.

I'm frankly unsure that our current global civilization could withstand a 3° F rise given the drop in food production and the increase in refugees flooding out of hard-hit areas. And if we hit 3°, then 6° is pretty well "baked in the cake", if you'll pardon the expression, due to melting permafrost and the increased release of oceanic methane hydrates.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Permian Extinction Data S...