HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Environment & Energy » Environment & Energy (Group) » STUDY: Kardashians Get 40...

Thu Jun 28, 2012, 06:28 PM

STUDY: Kardashians Get 40 Times More News Coverage Than Ocean Acidification

Carbon dioxide emissions are not just warming up our atmosphere, they're also changing the chemistry of our oceans. This phenomenon is known as ocean acidification, or sometimes as global warming's "evil twin" or the "osteoporosis of the sea." Scientists have warned that it poses a serious threat to ocean life. Yet major American news outlets covered the Kardashians over 40 times more often than ocean acidification over the past year and a half.



Rising carbon dioxide emissions have caused the oceans to become around 30 percent more acidic since the Industrial Revolution, and if we do not lower the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, the ocean surface could be up to 150 percent more acidic by 2100. At that level, the shells of some plankton would dissolve, large parts of the ocean would become inhospitable to coral reef growth, and the rapidity of the change could threaten much of the marine food web. According to the National Research Council, the chemical changes are taking place "at an unprecedented rate and magnitude" and are "practically irreversible on a time scale of centuries."

Despite a boom of recent scientific research documenting this threat, there has been a blackout on the topic at most media outlets. Since the end of 2010, ABC, NBC and Fox News have completely ignored ocean acidification, and the Los Angeles Times, USA TODAY, Wall Street Journal, MSNBC, CNN and CBS have barely mentioned it at all.

While most coverage described the basic scientific phenomenon or listed ocean acidification as a serious environmental challenge, the Wall Street Journal dismissed the problem. All three mentions of ocean acidification from the Journal were from columns that downplayed the threat—there was not a single straight news article interviewing scientists. One of those columns was a full article devoted to distorting and cherry-picking the science on ocean acidification. The Journal also published a letter to the editor (not counted in this study) from the Competitive Enterprise Institute’s Chris Horner who summarily dismissed ocean acidification as “the latest nominee to supplant troubled CO2-warming theory.” But the threat is nothing to shake off.


...

more: http://mediamatters.org/blog/201206270006

10 replies, 1452 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 10 replies Author Time Post
Reply STUDY: Kardashians Get 40 Times More News Coverage Than Ocean Acidification (Original post)
limpyhobbler Jun 2012 OP
cyberpj Jun 2012 #1
LiberalEsto Jun 2012 #2
Systematic Chaos Jun 2012 #5
Bill USA Jun 2012 #3
demosincebirth Jun 2012 #4
XemaSab Jun 2012 #6
gejohnston Jun 2012 #7
LiberalEsto Jun 2012 #8
NickB79 Jun 2012 #9
Bosso 63 Jun 2012 #10

Response to limpyhobbler (Original post)

Thu Jun 28, 2012, 06:47 PM

1. Just exactly the way today's corporate media wants it. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to limpyhobbler (Original post)

Thu Jun 28, 2012, 06:49 PM

2. So throw the Kardashians into the ocean and watch them slowly dissolve... nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LiberalEsto (Reply #2)

Thu Jun 28, 2012, 09:23 PM

5. DUzy, + one googol zillion, AND a gold star!

Fucking righteous, Sirs!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to limpyhobbler (Original post)

Thu Jun 28, 2012, 06:51 PM

3. Porn vs Problems

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to limpyhobbler (Original post)

Thu Jun 28, 2012, 07:43 PM

4. Maybe they have talent?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to limpyhobbler (Original post)

Thu Jun 28, 2012, 09:42 PM

6. New rule:

Using the word "Kardashian" will get you banned from E/E.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to limpyhobbler (Original post)

Thu Jun 28, 2012, 11:16 PM

7. what exactly are they famous for?

Newton Norman Minow was right.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gejohnston (Reply #7)

Fri Jun 29, 2012, 09:14 AM

8. Dunno, but I used to think they were enemy aliens from Star Trek

You know, like the Cardassians, Ferengi, Borg, Klingons...

It's a pity the Kardashians don't have a permanent, one-way Cloaking Device.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gejohnston (Reply #7)

Fri Jun 29, 2012, 11:25 AM

9. One has an ass so big the others live inside it like hobbits

That's my best guess, anyway.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to limpyhobbler (Original post)

Fri Jun 29, 2012, 04:16 PM

10. So like the Ocean is tripping on acid? That is like so far out!

OMG!

XOXO

Kim

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread