Mon May 28, 2012, 08:22 PM
kristopher (21,351 posts)
Coal Industry Pays Fake Activists $50 To Wear Pro-Coal Shirts At Public HearingCoal Industry Pays Fake Activists $50 To Wear Pro-Coal Shirts At Public Hearing
By Rebecca Leber on May 25, 2012 at 11:38 am
"Activists" offered $50 to wear pro-coal shirts. Apparently unable to find real activists, the coal industry paid astroturfers $50 to wear pro-coal t-shirts at an Environmental Protection Agency hearing yesterday. The EPA hearings, held yesterday in Chicago and Washington, D.C., were focused on the agency’s first-ever carbon standards for new power plants. The industry has adamantly opposed these standards, as well as standards on mercury — a pollutant that even Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) admits is harmful. This year, coal is throwing around its weight by spending tens of millions of dollars on media advertising and political contributions. Coal is also engaging in fake advocacy campaigns, known as astroturfing. In a Craigslist ad found by the Environmental Law & Policy Center in Chicago, a coal group promised participants $50 to “wear a t-shirt in support of an energy project.” Upon further digging, the Sierra Club blog pieced together much of the deleted Craigslist ad: People needed to attend a public meeting (Tinley Park /Chicago) ... See screenshot of ad at: http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/05/25/490340/coal-astroturfing-epa-hearing/
|
8 replies, 1335 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
| Author | Time | Post | |
| kristopher | May 2012 | OP | |
| freshwest | May 2012 | #1 | |
| patrice | May 2012 | #2 | |
| kristopher | May 2012 | #3 | |
| WriteWrong | May 2012 | #4 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | May 2012 | #5 | |
| kristopher | May 2012 | #6 | |
| AllyCat | May 2012 | #7 | |
| kristopher | May 2012 | #8 |
Response to kristopher (Original post)
Mon May 28, 2012, 08:31 PM
freshwest (31,565 posts)
1. Because the American people don't know the difference between 'free speech' and 'paid for speech.'
Response to freshwest (Reply #1)
Mon May 28, 2012, 10:01 PM
kristopher (21,351 posts)
3. Well, if *I* don't have to pay for it, doesn't that make it free?
|
my header is the ballon I imagine over the head of the character in a cartoon wearing an Elephant button.
|
Response to kristopher (Original post)
Mon May 28, 2012, 10:01 PM
WriteWrong (85 posts)
4. What ELSE will these people do for $50?
Response to kristopher (Original post)
Mon May 28, 2012, 11:36 PM
ProgressiveProfessor (22,144 posts)
5. Multiple prior threads in other groups/forums
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #5)
Mon May 28, 2012, 11:59 PM
kristopher (21,351 posts)
6. Good! The more coverage of what the coal/nuclear complex is up to, the better.
Response to kristopher (Original post)
Tue May 29, 2012, 01:54 PM
AllyCat (7,525 posts)
7. It's like the GOP paying WI residents to put pro-Walker signs in their yards
|
They can't find supporters, they have to pay them.
|
Response to AllyCat (Reply #7)
Tue May 29, 2012, 02:04 PM
kristopher (21,351 posts)

