HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Economy & Education » Labor Movement (Group) » Court kills, for now, NLR...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Wed Aug 1, 2012, 10:24 PM

Court kills, for now, NLRB attempt to speed union elections

GRRRR.

http://www.peoplesworld.org/court-kills-for-now-nlrb-attempt-to-speed-union-elections/



WASHINGTON - A federal district judge in D.C. has turned down the National Labor Relations Board's request to reconsider and reverse his prior ruling killing - for now - the board's planned rule to make union recognition elections fairer and more efficient.

The rejection by District Judge James Boasberg cheered the Radical Right, the Chamber of Commerce - which sued to stop the rule - and anti-worker House Education and the Workforce Committee Chairman John Kline, R-Minn. And it left the board pondering its next move in the controversy.

Boasberg originally threw out the rule earlier this year because, he decided, the NLRB lacked a quorum when it passed the measure last December 16. The board's two Democratic members voted for the rule, but its sole Republican, Brian Hayes neither opposed it nor abstained. He didn't vote at all.

The NLRB's rule would deprive businesses of some of procedural tricks they use to delay and deny workers the right to vote on whether to unionize. It would consolidate hearings, mandate hearings on eligibility be after the vote, and set a time limit for objecting to election procedures, among other things.

<snip>

3 replies, 802 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 3 replies Author Time Post
Reply Court kills, for now, NLRB attempt to speed union elections (Original post)
Starry Messenger Aug 2012 OP
demosincebirth Aug 2012 #1
GrantDem Aug 2012 #2
hay rick Aug 2012 #3

Response to Starry Messenger (Original post)

Wed Aug 1, 2012, 10:42 PM

1. This rule would have helped unions organize tremendouly. Hopefully the next time it will be

implemented.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Starry Messenger (Original post)

Thu Aug 2, 2012, 06:50 AM

2. Dangerous precedent

It appears that the court has established precedent that board members can stifle NLRB business by simply refusing to do their job.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GrantDem (Reply #2)

Thu Aug 2, 2012, 11:34 AM

3. But if they were playing badminton they'd be kicked off the board.

Disgusting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread