Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tansy_Gold

(17,855 posts)
Tue Nov 11, 2014, 06:54 PM Nov 2014

STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Wednesday, 12 November 2014

[font size=3]STOCK MARKET WATCH, Wednesday, 12 November 2014[font color=black][/font]


SMW for 11 November 2014

AT THE CLOSING BELL ON 11 November 2014
[center][font color=green]
Dow Jones 17,614.90 +1.16 (0.01%)
S&P 500 2,039.68 +1.42 (0.07%)
Nasdaq 4,660.56 +8.94 (0.19%)


[font color=red]10 Year 2.36% +0.06 (2.61%)
30 Year 3.09% +0.05 (1.64%) [font color=black]


[center]
[/font]


[HR width=85%]


[font size=2]Market Conditions During Trading Hours[/font]
[center]
(click on link for latest updates)
http://tools.investing.com/market_quotes.php?
[/center]



[font size=2]Euro, Yen, Loonie, Silver and Gold[center]

[/center]


[center]

[/center]


[HR width=95%]


[font color=black][font size=2]Handy Links - Market Data and News:[/font][/font]
[center]
Economic Calendar
Marketwatch Data
Bloomberg Economic News
Yahoo Finance
Google Finance
Bank Tracker
Credit Union Tracker
Daily Job Cuts
[/center]





[font color=black][font size=2]Handy Links - Essential Reading:[/font][/font]
[center]
Matt Taibi: Secret and Lies of the Bailout


[/center]



[font color=black][font size=2]Handy Links - Government Issues:[/font][/font]
[center]
LegitGov
Open Government
Earmark Database
USA spending.gov
[/center]




[div]
[font color=red]Partial List of Financial Sector Officials Convicted since 1/20/09 [/font][font color=red]
2/2/12 David Higgs and Salmaan Siddiqui, Credit Suisse, plead guilty to conspiracy involving valuation of MBS
3/6/12 Allen Stanford, former Caribbean billionaire and general schmuck, convicted on 13 of 14 counts in $2.2B Ponzi scheme, faces 20+ years in prison
6/4/12 Matthew Kluger, lawyer, sentenced to 12 years in prison, along with co-conspirator stock trader Garrett Bauer (9 years) and co-conspirator Kenneth Robinson (not yet sentenced) for 17 year insider trading scheme.
6/14/12 Allen Stanford sentenced to 110 years without parole.
6/15/12 Rajat Gupta, former Goldman Sachs director, found guilty of insider trading. Could face a decade in prison when sentenced later this year.
6/22/12 Timothy S. Durham, 49, former CEO of Fair Financial Company, convicted of one count conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud, 10 counts of wire fraud, and one count of securities fraud.
6/22/12 James F. Cochran, 56, former chairman of the board of Fair, convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud, one count of securities fraud, and six counts of wire fraud.
6/22/12 Rick D. Snow, 48, former CFO of Fair, convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud, one count of securities fraud, and three counts of wire fraud.
7/13/12 Russell Wassendorf Sr., CEO of collapsed brokerage firm Peregrine Financial Group Inc. arrested and charged with lying to regulators after admitting to authorities he embezzled "millions of dollars" and forged bank statements for "nearly twenty years."
8/22/12 Doug Whitman, Whitman Capital LLC hedge fund founder, convicted of insider trading following a trial in which he spent more than two days on the stand telling jurors he was innocent
10/26/12 UPDATE: Former Goldman Sachs director Rajat Gupta sentenced to two years in federal prison. He will, of course, appeal. . .
11/20/12 Hedge fund manager Matthew Martoma charged with insider trading at SAC Capital Advisors, and prosecutors are looking at Martoma's boss, Steven Cohen, for possible involvement.
02/14/13 Gilbert Lopez, former chief accounting officer of Stanford Financial Group, and former controller Mark Kuhrt sentenced to 20 yrs in prison for their roles in Allen Sanford's $7.2 billion Ponzi scheme.
03/29/13 Michael Sternberg, portfolio mgr at SAC Capital, arrested in NYC, charged with conspiracy and securities fraud. Pled not guilty and freed on $3m bail.
04/04/13 Matthew Marshall Taylor,fmr Goldman Sachs trader arrested, charged by CFTC w/defrauding his employer on $8BN futures bet "by intentionally concealing the true huge size, as well as the risk and potential profits or losses associated."
04/04/13 Matthew Taylor admits guilt, makes plea bargain. Sentencing set for 26 June; faces up to 20 years in prison but will likely only see 3-4 years. Says, "I am truly sorry."
04/11/13 Ex-KPMG LLP partner Scott London charged by federal prosecutors w/passing inside tips to a friend in exchange for cash, jewelry, and concert tickets; expected to plead guilty in May.
08/01/13 Fabrice Tourré convicted on six counts of security fraud, including "aiding and abetting" his former employer, Goldman Sachs
08/14/13 Javier Martin-Artajo and Julien Grout charged with wire fraud, falsifying records, and conspiracy in connection with JP Morgan's "London Whale" trade.
08/19/13 Phillip A. Falcone, manager of hedge fund Harbinger Capital Partners, agrees to admit to "wrongdoing" in market manipulation. Will banned from securities industry for 5 years and pay $18MM in disgorgement and fines.
09/16/13 Javier Martin-Artajo and Julien Grout officially indicted on charges associated with "London Whale" trade.
02/06/14 Matthew Martoma convicted of insider trading while at hedge fund SAC (Stephen A. Cohen) Capital Advisors. Expected sentence 7-10 years.
03/24/14 Annette Bongiorno, Bernard Madoff's secretary; Daniel Bonventre, director of operations for investments; JoAnn Crupi, an account manager; and Jerome O'Hara and George Perez, both computer programmers convicted of conspiracy to defraud clients, securities fraud, and falsifying the books and records.
05/19/14 Credit Suisse, which has an investment bank branch in NYC, agrees to plead guilty and pay appx. $2.6 billion penalties for helping wealthy Americans hide wealth and avoid taxes.
09/08/14 Matthew Martoma, convicted SAC trader, sentenced to 9 years in prison plus forfeiture of $9.3 million, including home and bank accounts







[HR width=95%]


[center]

[font size=3][font color=red]This thread contains opinions and observations. Individuals may post their experiences, inferences and opinions on this thread. However, it should not be construed as advice. It is unethical (and probably illegal) for financial recommendations to be given here.[/font][/font][/font color=red][font color=black]


14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
1. Note to self for next year
Tue Nov 11, 2014, 07:06 PM
Nov 2014

Bank was open, trash was picked up for Veteran's Day. No mail, no govt. offices.

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
2. I had the unpleasant experience of being dragged into a Ponzi scheme sales pitch
Tue Nov 11, 2014, 10:46 PM
Nov 2014

An acquaintance of mine invited me to a presentation by minions of the "Unfranchise" which is the brainchild of an ex-Amway dude named Ridinger.

Market America Exposed: Misleading False Claims

http://blog.happierabroad.com/2012/10/market-america-scam-and-misleading.html


* Note: This is NOT another Market America shill article spreading propaganda. This is a genuine no-nonsense criticism of Market America's business opportunity using logic, facts and common sense.

"It can be very difficult, if not impossible, for most individuals to make a lot of money through the direct sale of products to consumers. And big money is what recruiters often allude to in their pitches."

"You'd be hard-pressed to find anyone making over $1.50 an hour. The primary product is opportunity. The strongest, most powerful motivational force today is false hope."
- USA Today article on MLM's (2/10/2011)


To whom it may concern:

Back in 2000, I responded to a "business opportunity" ad in a newspaper in Bellingham, WA. It turned out to be for Market America, which touted itself as being one of the best business opportunities in America. I attended these overly enthusiastic meetings which employed cult-like brainwashing techniques, group pressure, and sensational promises.

But what I found out eventually is that in truth, Market America's business opportunity was just another MLM (Multi-Level Marketing) scheme, aka Network Marketing, dressed up in fancy terms in an attempt to disassociate itself from the negative stigma of MLM's. Here are some of its core misleading false claims vs. reality.

1. Market America claims to not be an MLM and argues that it is different from one. They call their system "the binomial system of linear marketing" or "The UnFranchise System" and use terms such as "vertical downline" to disassociate themselves from the negative stigma of MLM. They claim that their downline structure is vertical, like a skyscraper, rather than horizontal or pyramidal. Here is a short video by one of its distributors that explains how their downline structure is different and better than that of a pyramidal MLM:



This video is a bit misleading in a number of ways. First, even if there is a vertical downline of commissions, still, the system says that in order for everyone in your downline to benefit, everyone must recruit at least two people (which of course cannot go on forever, so someone is guaranteed to lose out), so if you recruit two people and they recruit two others and so forth, of course the downline is going to have a pyramidal structure, regardless of the commission structure.

Second, notice that the presenter put "100 percent" next to every level of the downline to make it look tantalizing. He said that everyone in your downline, including yourself, receives 100 percent of the BV (commission points) generated by the person at the bottom level. But this is a mere mind trick to make it look big. 100 percent can apply to anything, for example, 100 percent of $1 is $1 - it does not make $1 bigger than it actually is. Let's use some common sense here. There is no free lunch and no free money. Even if Market America's commission structure was a little better than Amway or other MLM's, it can't be that much better, or else the company would lose money. They cannot pay everyone more than the net profit earned, or else they would lose money. This is common sense.

Third, note how he says that Market America has to cap everyone's earnings at $3600 per week, indirectly implying that it is so easy to reach $3600 per week, that they have had to cap it to make it fair, lest a ton of people exceed it, as if this cap really made a difference. Yeah right. It's as if we are supposed to think "Awww shucks, the most I can make is $3600 a week. Darn. I was hoping to make more!" Uh huh. It's a cheesy psychological trick to make you think that $3600 a week is easy to achieve, without directly telling you so. My gosh. Even though I can see through it, it's too bad there are many suckers out there who will not. In reality, less than one percent of distributors make anywhere near that amount. Most of them make little or nothing, or end up losing money (see the sourced statistics from Wikipedia below).

In any case, the point is, just because Market America has a slightly different commission structure, or even downline structure, that still does NOT make it "not an MLM" as it claims, for it still fits the DEFINITION of an MLM. You still have to sell products and recruit people to earn money, regardless of the downline structure or commission plan. Here is a bare bones definition of an MLM from Wikipedia:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-level_marketing

"Multi-level marketing (MLM) is a marketing strategy in which the sales force is compensated not only for sales they personally generate, but also for the sales of the other salespeople that they recruit. This recruited sales force is referred to as the participant's downline, and can provide multiple levels of compensation."

As you can see, this definition fits Market America to a T at the nuts and bolts level. NOTHING in Market America's business plan, downline structure or commission plan differentiates itself from this. Changing or altering a downline structure or commission plan, or repackaging itself with new terms and labels does NOT change that. Thus, Market America has no right to say that it is not an MLM. It's only doing so to avoid the negative public stigma of MLM's and of course to make itself look "special".

So when you break it down, it's the same nuts and bolts as a standard MLM in that: You have to recruit a minimum of two great salespeople who then have to be trained to recruit a minimum of two more great salespeople, and so forth, and of course, the products have to be sold by all of you in order to earn commissions (known as BV in Market America). All MLM's work that way, regardless of how they dress themselves up. It's not anymore complicated than that. So in reality, they are really no different because they all work the same way at the nuts and bolts level - and at that level the system is fundamentally flawed (more on that below). Thus, their claim of not being an MLM is unsubstantiated.

Furthermore, Wikipedia cites these common criticisms of MLM's:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-level_marketing

"MLM companies have been a frequent subject of criticism as well as the target of lawsuits. Criticism has focused on their similarity to illegal pyramid schemes, price fixing of products, high initial start-up costs, emphasis on recruitment of lower-tiered salespeople over actual sales, encouraging if not requiring salespeople to purchase and use the company's products, potential exploitation of personal relationships which are used as new sales and recruiting targets, complex and sometimes exaggerated compensation schemes, and cult-like techniques which some groups use to enhance their members' enthusiasm and devotion."

Sound familiar? Again, that fits Market America to a T, and the video above of its compensation plan is an example of an "exaggerated compensation scheme". It's no wonder that Market America is desperate to disassociate itself from the term MLM due to this bad rap.

2. Market America distributors claim that you don't have to be good at selling to succeed in their business. They tell this to all new recruits in order to not discourage them when they object "But I'm not good at selling". It's a total lie and a stupid one at that. Of course the product has to be SOLD. Where else is the money going to come from? Duh. Do you think your commissions are going to grow on trees? One way or another, the products have to be SOLD, and that involves SELLING. So this lie by Market America is an insult to human intelligence. In fact, you not only have to be good in sales, but also in RECRUITING and TRAINING as well, since you have to recruit people and train them. And all this for a low probability venture in which most people fail. (See stats below) Is that really worth it? Think about it.

In fact, selling in MLM is harder than usual sales jobs. Here's why:

a) Retail sales jobs are easy, because you are in a store where people come to buy stuff. All you have to do is be friendly and helpful and provide good customer service and they will buy stuff. That's why retail jobs tend to be minimum wage, because they are easy. You are selling to people who want something. But when you are selling to people who do NOT want what you are offering, that's a whole different ballgame. And Market America is just that. With Market America, you are not selling to real customers who are seeking your product. You are selling to people who are NOT seeking your product - everyone you can find out there, including your friends and family, who may start to avoid you if you keep pressuring them, needless to say.

Most people do not want to join an MLM and find its products to be overly priced, so it's a huge uphill battle. In order to recruit people, you have to use some deception and illusion, which is what MLM schemes always do, because the system can't sell itself at its nuts and bolts level. Regardless, you have to be an incredible sales person and a great recruiter, but even then, you will get a lot of rejections, and you will have to use exaggerations and misleading claims as well. Common sense should tell you that if a system is good, it will not need to exaggerate or mislead, only bad systems need to employ such tactics.

b) If you are selling something of value that is worth its price, then those who need it will buy it, if you can get it to them. In that case, you do not need to be good at sales. You just need to be friendly and helpful and provide good customer service. But in Market America's case, its products are overly priced, which is the usual case with MLM products, and therefore in order to sell overly priced products, one must have exceptional sales ability, or the ability to use deception, illusion and misleading tactics.

c) In Market America, you are not just selling a product, which is hard enough as already explained, you are selling a DREAM as well - the dream of becoming self-employed and financially independent. That's how you recruit people and create a downline to try to multiply your commissions, by selling them a dream. Needless to say, dreams are a concept and therefore harder to sell than products are.


"You'd be hard-pressed to find anyone making over $1.50 an hour. The primary product is opportunity. The strongest, most powerful motivational force today is false hope."
- USA Today article on MLM's (2/10/2011)

Either way you look at it, you have to SELL the products and RECRUIT others to SELL the product as well. There's no way around it. That's a fact, even if Market America denies it. After all, your commissions are not going to come from the tooth fairy. Come on now. In order to sell and recruit, you have two options: Start with your friends and family and social network. If that fails, then you have to go out and talk to random strangers or place "business opportunity" ads in newspaper classifieds.

Now ask yourself: Do you really want to do that? Do you want to harass strangers like that and try to mislead them into some vague "business opportunity" that you can't even be upfront about? Do you want to put vague "business opportunity" ads in newspaper classifieds to lure people in? Isn't that all very shady and predatory and unnatural? How does your conscience feel about that? And all this for a low probability venture in which most people fail too. (See stats below) Is that really worth it? Think about it.


"It can be very difficult, if not impossible, for most individuals to make a lot of money through the direct sale of products to consumers. And big money is what recruiters often allude to in their pitches."
- USA Today article on MLM's (2/10/2011)

3. Market America claims that if you work hard and follow their formula/teachings, you are guaranteed to succeed. This is also not true, and anyone with real entrepreneurial experience can tell you that. Business and reality don't work that way. Let me explain why.

First:

1) Not everyone can be at the top in a niche. There isn’t room.
2) You can’t succeed by just following a formula. It doesn’t work that way. Too many other factors come into play, such as talent, passion, drive, dedication, luck, timing, market demand and availability, your network, social skills, personal charisma, karma, destiny, divine will, and other intangibles.

You see, you can’t just emulate a successful person by doing what he/she did and get the same results, at least not in business. Do you think you can just copy everything Bill Gates did and get the same results he did, especially since he beat you to it and is already at the top of the pyramid?

Let me give you another example. Can an Olympic gold medalist teach you how to win a gold medal? Even if he/she tried, can you just do everything he/she did and win a gold medal yourself? Nope. It doesn’t work that way, because there are many other factors that caused the athlete to win a gold medal, and formulas are not it. Besides hard work, talent, luck, timing, karma, divine will, etc. also affect the outcome. Some people are also good and talented at a certain niche, while others aren't. The same applies in business.

Timing is crucial in a market. You have to be one of the first in the niche or category to establish a base. If you are not, then it’s much harder for you to compete. If you are the first to start something unique that works, then you have a much better chance. For example, if you had started an online auction before Ebay, you would have had the chance to make it big in a new market. But you can’t start an online auction now and compete with Ebay. No way. To make it, you have to start something that’s not been done before, or improve on an existing niche or specialty, which others have not before.

So you see, it’s not that simple as following a formula. What you gotta do is this: Figure out what you do best and capitalize on that. Discover what your gifts are. Look for innovative ideas that fulfill what people want. And never quit. That’s what you gotta do. Hope that makes sense to you.

Furthermore, the MLM formula itself is mathematically guaranteed to fail for the majority of its distributors, as I will explain in the next section below.

4. Market America insinuates that the majority of its distributors are making money and doing well. (whatever that means) This is one of its BIGGEST LIES. Nothing could be further from the truth. All evidence and statistical research points to the exact OPPOSITE.

First, the majority in Market America or any MLM scheme for that matter, are mathematically guaranteed to FAIL due to the inherent nature of the system. Whether you have 10 people in your downline or 1 billion, the bottom level will always have MORE people in it than all those above combined. Since the downline levels cannot multiply to infinity (even if everyone in the world were involved) it has to stop at some point. And when it does, the majority at the bottom will end up losing money. In one of my articles, I break it down for you with simple math here:

http://www.debunkingskeptics.com/Multi-Level-Marketing.htm

Robert Fitzpatrick, America's leading expert on MLM's, agrees. In a USA Today article, he is quoted as saying:


http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/companies/2010-10-15-multilevelmarketing15_ST3_N.htm

"Robert FitzPatrick, who runs PyramidSchemeAlert.org and works as an expert witness in lawsuits against multilevel marketing companies, says state and federal government officials simply can't or choose not to police multilevel marketing companies as much as he believes is necessary. FitzPatrick says "virtually all" consumer salespeople who work in multilevel marketing lose because the recruitment-based marketing can only bring in so much money. Each level always has to be bigger than the last level, and the "vast majority always have to be at the bottom.""

Wikipedia's sourced stats on MLM's show overwhelmingly that most people end up making little or nothing, or losing money.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-level_marketing#Income_levels

"Several sources have commented on the income level of specific MLMs or MLMs in general:

* The Times: "The Government investigation claims to have revealed that just 10% of Amway's agents in Britain make any profit, with less than one in ten selling a single item of the group's products."

* Scheibeler, a high level "Emerald" Amway member: "UK Justice Norris found in 2008 that out of an IBO [Independent Business Owners] population of 33,000, 'only about 90 made sufficient incomes to cover the costs of actively building their business.' That's a 99.7 percent loss rate for investors."

* Newsweek: based on Mona Vie's own 2007 income disclosure statement "fewer than 1 percent qualified for commissions and of those, only 10 percent made more than $100 a week."

* Business Students Focus on Ethics: "In the USA, the average annual income from MLM for 90% MLM members is no more than US $5,000, which is far from being a sufficient means of making a living (San Lian Life Weekly 1998)"

USA Today has had several articles:

* "While earning potential varies by company and sales ability, DSA says the median annual income for those in direct sales is $2,400."

* In an October 15, 2010 article, it was stated that documents of a MLM called Fortune reveal that 30 percent of its representatives make no money and that 54 percent of the remaining 70 percent only make $93 a month. The article also states Fortune is under investigation by the Attorneys General of Texas, Kentucky, North Dakota, and North Carolina with Missouri, South Carolina, Illinois, and Florida following up complaints against the company.

* A February 10, 2011 article stated "It can be very difficult, if not impossible, for most individuals to make a lot of money through the direct sale of products to consumers. And big money is what recruiters often allude to in their pitches."

* "Roland Whitsell, a former business professor who spent 40 years researching and teaching the pitfalls of multilevel marketing": "You'd be hard-pressed to find anyone making over $1.50 an hour, (t)he primary product is opportunity. The strongest, most powerful motivational force today is false hope."

(Sources above are linked at the URL above)

Of course, if you fail, like most do, they will say that the fault is with YOU, not the system, because the system is proven to work, so if you don't make it, then you must have not put in the right effort. This is the way fanatical followers rationalize to protect their belief system. Every religion with cult-like devotion does the same.

But even if you become one of the less than 5 percent of people who succeed in an MLM like Market America, and make good money, consider this. Your income is UNSTABLE. It's NOT smooth sailing residual income from there, as they claim. Wanna know why? Because even if you have a profitable downline under you, people quit, fail and drop out all the time and at any time. And when that happens, your business is thrown into chaos and you lose money, and have to train your downline to recruit more people again. So it's a neverending struggle that doesn't end even if you get in at the top.

Consequences

Besides its misleading claims, Market America is not risk free either. You have to invest a ton of time going to its meetings, which are mostly filled with rhetoric, and you will be pressured to go to seminars and pay for them, which could cost $70 - $100 each, and don't really help but are just pep talk rallies using cult-like techniques to manipulate your emotions and incite enthusiasm and fanatical devotion in you. Then if you join, you have to pay a startup fee which costs at least a few hundred dollars, and then you are required to purchase some product from Market America, and then the pressure is on. You have to sell those products or you lose money. And you have to recruit others as well, who must be good at selling and recruiting, or none of you will make real money. It's a lot of pressure in a low probability venture.

At its nuts and bolts, the system is discouraging and a low probability venture with many uphill struggles and misleading claims, believable only to the brainwashed. That's why they have to use deception, illusion and misleading tactics to incite your emotions, subdue your logic, and fill you with religious fanaticism, so that you will sell and recruit, even in a losing game. It's all really sick when you think about it. It's no wonder why MLM's have a negative public stigma, which is well deserved. Thus it's no surprise why Market America distributors are trained NOT to tell potential recruitees that their system is an MLM.

In fact, if you Google "Market America Scam" you will find many shill sites planted by its reps, containing the usual sales cliches and rhetoric. If Market America was such a good system, why would it have to plant shill sites on the internet about it? Honest people and organizations with nothing to hide do not need to use shills, for truth does not need shills.

Here are some common sense questions to ask yourself:

- "If Market America's system is so good, why do they need to use deception and misleading claims?"

- "If Market America's system is so good, why do they need to seek you out and advertise to you?"

- "Why does Market America need to plant shill sites on the internet to catch Google search terms such as "Market America Scam"? Does truth need shills to protect it?"

- "Why do you have to pay for seminars and invest in their products? Why do you have to pay a sizable amount to even join?"

- "Why do you have to recruit others to join in order to make money? Isn't that taking advantage of others? How does your gut and conscience feel about that? Doesn't it feel shady?"

In any case, check out this article I wrote long ago about MLM's where I use simple math to explain why the MLM system is guaranteed to fail for the MAJORITY of those in it.

http://www.debunkingskeptics.com/Multi-Level-Marketing.htm

Alternatives to MLM

Finally, if MLM is not the answer for you, and you still want an alternative to the enslaving routine of a regular job, or can't find one that you love, here are some alternative options for you to consider from my other article:

http://blog.happierabroad.com/2012/10/alternatives-working-regular-job.html

Thanks for reading.



Now, I have to figure out how to tell this starry-eyed but hopelessly impractical young woman why she is wasting her time and energy. Maybe I should talk to her husband....

Fuddnik

(8,846 posts)
3. When I was still in Cleveland, my dentist tried to rope me into Amway.
Wed Nov 12, 2014, 06:43 AM
Nov 2014

He must have tried it with all of his patients because over a year, I noticed his waiting room getting less congested by the week. Like a dentist needed extra income.

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
4. Read Traders' Ludicrous Chat Transcripts In Currency Manipulation Probe
Wed Nov 12, 2014, 08:24 AM
Nov 2014
http://www.businessinsider.com/banks-fined-for-manipulating-foreign-exchange-currency-trading-market-2014-11

Five major banks — including UBS, the Royal Bank of Scotland, JPMorgan Chase, HSBC, and Citibank — just got slammed with $3.4 billion in fines, following a lengthy probe over accusations that traders had tried to manipulate currency markets.

Authorities in Switzerland, the UK, and the US were all involved in the investigation, which resulted in the biggest set of charges ever levied by British financial regulators.

One regulator, Britain's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), said that in a 5-year-period between January 2008 and October 2013, "ineffective controls at the Banks allowed G10 spot FX traders to put their Banks’ interests ahead of those of their clients, other market participants, and the wider UK financial system."

The FCA continued: "These failings allowed traders at those Banks to behave unacceptably. They shared information about clients’ activities which they had been trusted to keep confidential and attempted to manipulate G10 spot FX currency rates, including in collusion with traders at other firms, in a way that could disadvantage those clientsand the market."



Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/banks-fined-for-manipulating-foreign-exchange-currency-trading-market-2014-11#ixzz3Ir9wqG9R
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
8. When will the penny drop for the Elitists?
Wed Nov 12, 2014, 08:36 AM
Nov 2014

When will they turning banking into a public utility/monopoly and put it under the control of the State, so that all these crimes will be legally legal? After all, corruption in government is a lot cheaper.

Sigh. If ever there is a need for Artificial Intelligence, that would uniformly and reliably handle an issue without any human intervention, this would be it. Unfortunately, we will never have an AI sufficiently intelligent to defeat Man at his most predatory...

DemReadingDU

(16,000 posts)
13. Barclays Is Said to Get Cold Feet, Pulls out of the deal
Wed Nov 12, 2014, 09:17 AM
Nov 2014

11/11/14 As Currency Settlement Draws Near, Barclays Is Said to Get Cold Feet

The giant British bank Barclays has informed regulators that it might not join the settlement, according to people briefed on the matter, a decision that grew more and more final as the hours dragged on.

For its part, Barclays developed cold feet as other regulators, the Federal Reserve and the Department of Financial Services in New York, declined to join the settlement planned for Wednesday.

The bank, the people said, questioned whether the settlement might open the door to the New York regulator withdrawing the bank’s license to operate in New York. But there was no indication that the regulator, Benjamin M. Lawsky, would take such drastic action.
Instead, the New York regulator and the Fed indicated that they were reluctant to join a settlement because their investigations were still at an early stage. The New York agency, which has a reputation for breaking from other regulators in prominent enforcement cases, privately complained that one big deal might provide cover to the banks and amount to a slap on the wrist.

more...
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/11/11/as-currency-settlement-draws-near-barclays-is-said-to-get-cold-feet/


xchrom

(108,903 posts)
5. The 10 Most Important Things In The World Right Now
Wed Nov 12, 2014, 08:26 AM
Nov 2014
http://www.businessinsider.com/10-most-important-things-in-the-world-nov-12-2014-11

1. US President Obama and Chinese President Jinping reached a landmark climate deal, with the US pledging to slash greenhouse gas emissions by 26-28% by 2025 from 2005-levels and China agreeing to reach peak carbon emissions by 2030.

2. The climate agreement signals the first time ever that China, the world's top carbon polluter, has committed to a greenhouse gas emissions cap.

3. Scientists are making final preparations to deploy the Philae probe from the Rosetta spacecraft and land it on a comet, marking a space history first.

4. Japan's Nikkei soared to a 7-year high on Wednesday on news that President Shinzo Abe is preparing to call a snap vote and potentially delay a national sales tax hike planned for October 2015.

5. Sierra Leone will pay $5,000 (£3,140 pounds) to the family of any health worker who dies of Ebola from treating an infected patient.



Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/10-most-important-things-in-the-world-nov-12-2014-11#ixzz3IrAlA7tp

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
6. European Markets Are Sinking
Wed Nov 12, 2014, 08:29 AM
Nov 2014
http://www.businessinsider.com/market-update-nov-12-2014-2014-11

Here's the scorecard:

France's CAC 40 is down 0.42%

Germany's DAX is down 0.72%

The UK's FTSE 100 is down 0.19%

Italy's FTSE MIB is down 0.79%

Spain's IBEX is down 0.56%

Asian markets are solidly up. Japan's Nikkei closed up 0.43%, touching its highest level in seven years, and Hong Kong's Hang Seng closed up 0.55%.

US futures are down a hair: the Dow is 14 points lower, and the S&P 500 is 2.245 points down.

There's big data out of Europe on Wednesday, with UK unemployment at 9:30 a.m. GMT and eurozone industrial production at 10 a.m. ET. Analysts expect UK unemployment to dip to 5.9% and that industrial production in Europe rose 0.7% between August and September.

At 10:30 a.m. GMT, the Bank of England's inflation report is out: the quarterly update gives the central bank's view of the economic outlook and the hints of when hikes in interest rates may finally begin.



Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/market-update-nov-12-2014-2014-11#ixzz3IrBIKTbh
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
14. A lot of capital flight? Hot Money Sloshing out of the Euro Bathtub?
Wed Nov 12, 2014, 01:49 PM
Nov 2014

Or even worse, money laundering to safer havens....

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
7. Eurozone Industrial Production Bounces Back In September
Wed Nov 12, 2014, 08:32 AM
Nov 2014
http://www.businessinsider.com/eurozone-industrial-production-bounces-back-in-september-2014-11

Industrial production in the eurozone rose by 0.6% between August and September of this year, according to figures released by eurostat on Wednesday. This is slightly lower than the 0.7% month-over-month increase economics were expecting.

The 0.6% rise in September is due to capital good production rising by 2.9% and energy by 0.3%. Meanwhile, durable consumer goods fell by 2.6%., eurostat said.

Industrial production increased by 0.6% year-over-year in September.



Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/eurozone-industrial-production-bounces-back-in-september-2014-11#ixzz3IrC2es3C

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
9. GLOBAL BANKS FINED BILLIONS IN CURRENCY PROBE
Wed Nov 12, 2014, 08:49 AM
Nov 2014
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/B/BANKS_FINES?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2014-11-12-05-29-29

LONDON (AP) -- U.S., British and Swiss regulators have fined five global banks $3.4 billion for attempting to manipulate foreign exchange markets - the latest penalties for an industry previously criticized for rigging interest rates and for their role in triggering the global financial crisis.

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority and the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority said Wednesday that Citibank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, Royal Bank of Scotland, HSBC Bank and UBS had agreed to settlements totaling almost $3.4 billion. The FCA said it is continuing to investigate Barclays Bank.

"Today's record fines mark the gravity of the failings we found, and firms need to take responsibility for putting it right," said Martin Wheatley, chief executive of the FCA. "They must make sure their traders do not game the system to boost profits."

Some $5.3 trillion changes hands every day on the global foreign exchange market, with 40 percent of trades occurring in London. Currencies including dollars, pounds, euros and yen trade in the loosely regulated market dominated by a group of elite banks. But those trades have an even wider impact because companies around the world use market prices to value assets and manage currency risks.

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
10. GERMAN GOV'T ADVISERS SEE 1 PCT GROWTH NEXT YEAR
Wed Nov 12, 2014, 08:52 AM
Nov 2014
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/EU_GERMANY_ECONOMY?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2014-11-12-06-17-34

BERLIN (AP) -- The German government's independent panel of economic advisers is forecasting growth of just 1 percent next year, undercutting officials' predictions, and criticizing some government policies.

In a report Wednesday, the panel also cut its 2014 growth forecast to 1.2 percent from its 1.9 percent prediction in March. The government recently forecast growth of 1.2 percent this year and 1.3 percent next year.

The advisers pointed to "geopolitical risks" such as the Ukraine crisis and weak eurozone growth. They also said the government's labor and social policies, such as plans to introduce a minimum wage next year, may have hit confidence.

Chancellor Angela Merkel pointed to "geopolitical challenges" and questioned how a policy that hasn't yet taken effect could be blamed for slowing the economy.

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
11. BANK OF ENGLAND EXPECTS INFLATION TO KEEP FALLING
Wed Nov 12, 2014, 08:53 AM
Nov 2014
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/EU_BRITAIN_ECONOMY?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2014-11-12-06-05-02


LONDON (AP) -- Bank of England Governor Mark Carney says inflation is "more likely than not" to continue to fall below one percent in the next six months and that growth will be slightly weaker due to a global slowdown.

As he released a quarterly report on the country's economy, Carney said Wednesday that growth expectations for next year have been trimmed from 3 percent to 2.9 percent due to weaker activity in Europe and China.

But demand in Britain remains robust, supported by easier credit conditions and stronger confidence. Another plus is that unemployment is down, reaching 6 percent in the three months to August.

The bank maintained its guidance that future interest rate increases will depend on economic growth, and that when the bank raises rates, it will do so gradually.

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
12. TOP ITALIAN BANKS HEALTHIER AFTER EU TEST
Wed Nov 12, 2014, 08:55 AM
Nov 2014
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/EU_ITALY_BANKS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2014-11-11-14-35-19

MILAN (AP) -- The recent Europe-wide health check on banks is producing results for Italy, whose top two lenders on Tuesday posted a strong rise in quarterly profits after cleaning up their finances in anticipation of the test.

While nine smaller Italian banks failed the test, putting a negative spotlight on Italy's failure to generate economic growth, UniCredit and Intesa SanPaolo, the country's two biggest banks, passed with strong marks.

Before the test, the two banks cleaned out their books by writing off bad loans, a painful process that seems to be paying dividends. On Tuesday, both reported profits in the three months ending Sept. 30 more than doubling, early signs of recovery in the banking sector.

UniCredit CEO Federico Ghizzoni told an analyst conference call that the test had rewarded `'the strong effort UniCredit has made in the last year to strengthen our balance sheet."
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Wed...