Latin America
Related: About this forumGovernment and Media Fantasies About Cuban Politics
Government and Media Fantasies About Cuban Politics
by Matt Peppe / April 13th, 2015
The historic meeting between President Barack Obama and President Raúl Castro of Cuba at the Summit of the Americas in Panama over the weekend could be interpreted as a stepping stone toward the end of U.S. subversion and economic warfare relentlessly carried out since the success of the Cuban revolution 55 years ago. But it is questionable whether President Obama intends to transform relations, treating the government of Cuba as a sovereign equal and recognizing their right to choose different political and economic models, or merely to continue the same decades-old policy with a more palatable sales pitch the way he has done with drones and extrajudicial surveillance. U.S. media, however, appear to have fully embraced the propaganda line that Washington is acting in the best interests of the Cuban people to liberate them from political repression. The New York Times weighed in the day before the Summit by claiming that most Cubans identify not with the sociopolitical goals advanced by their countrys government, but rather with those supported by Washington.
In an editorial titled Cuban Expectations in a New Era (4/7/2015), the New York Times advances the proposition that engagement between the two governments will lead to Cubas integration (at least partially) into the global capitalist economy. This in turn will create increased financial prosperity as Cuba grows its private sector and turns away from the failed model the government has imposed since the start of the revolution.
The New York Times portrays the Cuban government as intransigent, stubbornly holding its citizens back from the inevitable progress that would result from aligning itself with Washington. The Times claims that the Cuban government maintains a historically tight grip on Cuban society.
They insinuate there is a Cuban version of the U.S.s political police, the FBI, who for decades spied on nonviolent activists representing African Americans, Puerto Rican nationalists, the anti-war movement, animal rights and environmental groups to prevent social change through political action. Many of the activists illegally targeted by the FBIs COINTELPRO program still remain incarcerated as political prisoners. But the Times doesnt mention any such Cuban equivalent, likely because none exists.
More:
http://dissidentvoice.org/2015/04/government-and-media-fantasies-about-cuban-politics/
Good reads:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1016120087
Judi Lynn
(160,516 posts)They insinuate there is a Cuban version of the U.S.s political police, the FBI, who for decades spied on nonviolent activists representing African Americans, Puerto Rican nationalists, the anti-war movement, animal rights and environmental groups to prevent social change through political action. Many of the activists illegally targeted by the FBIs COINTELPRO program still remain incarcerated as political prisoners. But the Times doesnt mention any such Cuban equivalent, likely because none exists.
The New York Times argues that the Cuban dissidents attending sideline events at the Panama Summit deserve to have regional leaders amplify their voices. They claim that such dissidents have struggled for years to be heard in their own country, where those critical of the Communist system have faced repression.
There is no evidence presented that the dissidents have struggled in Cuba because they have been repressed, rather than having struggled because most of the population simply does not agree with their ideas or sympathize with them.
In a presumptuous attempt to delegitimize the Cuban government, the Times claims it is actually the dissident contra-revolution that represents the majority of the Cuban people: The government will have to reckon with the fact that many of the dissidents aspirations are shared by most Cubans.
Again, there is no evidence that this is actually the case anywhere other than in Washingtons fantasies. The dissidents aspirations are not even stated. One assumes this refers to the objective of repealing socialism and instituting capitalism, also the official policy of the U.S. government. Supporting changes to Cubas economy within the socialist structure is not a dissident position. Such changes and improvements are proposed and debated at all levels of Cuban politics, and have been openly embraced by Raúl Castro since he assumed the Presidency.
That the majority of the Cuban people share the dissidents political views is a bold claim. People familiar with Cuba have reached the opposite conclusion. Victor Rodriguez, a professor in the Ethnic Studies department of California State University Long Beach, recently returned from a visit to Cuba and had a different outlook.
I spoke with at least 50 Cubans of all ages and walks of life, he said. Themes were that sovereignty, health care, and education are non-negotiable. Rodriguez said that Cubans did have complaints about their system, with many stressing the need for higher salaries.
Unlike dissidents in the United States, who cannot start a political organization or journalistic enterprise without concerning themselves with how it will impact their ability to pay for health care, a mortgage, food for their family, and education, dissidents in Cuba do not have any of these worries. They enjoy a robust safety net that covers every single citizen, regardless of their view of the Cuban political system.