Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumSo, somebody in GD, whose name will remain unspoken,
stated that polls indicating overwhelming Democratic support for Hillary are flawed because Democrats are "ignorant and scared." I'll leave it at that, because
Response to MoonRiver (Original post)
hrmjustin This message was self-deleted by its author.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)... that Hillary's "base" consists of bankers, 1%ers, and low-information voters.
As I responded to that poster, if one needs to convince themselves that anyone who supports a candidate they don't like is too stupid to be politically aware, it speaks volumes about their own skewed thinking.
William769
(55,144 posts)The hilariousness that followed that made it bearable.
If I can find it again, I'll give you the link.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)Whoever thinks that makes me a 1%er is a fucking moron.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)I make....GASP...11.30 an hour!
Low info voter my ass. Isn't that a Hate radio saying direct from rush limpballs???
Damn these undercover republican trolls are outing themselves!
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)This is Democratic Underground.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)You did your part by exposing it to DUers who need to be aware of the b.s. posts.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Btw that poster got two hides today and his transparency page is showing.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)At least he's gone from our view.
Thanks Moonriver for the catch-o-the day!!!
And thank you hrmjustin for your extra nudge.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Was on the jury pointing that post out. Worst jury I've ever been on on this site. Bar none the most wrong decision I've ever seen.
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)I'm dying of curiosity as to who the poster is - given how many are possibilities.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)William769
(55,144 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Gothmog
(144,924 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Gothmog
(144,924 posts)I have looked some of the poster's posts and his/her/its hides. Some of that poster's unhidden posts are also bad.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Gothmog
(144,924 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I think that was a mistake.
kaiden
(1,314 posts)overboard with their hate for Hillary. Frankly, I just don't get the animosity and the ugliness makes me sad.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)The rest of the people I know, mainly women, are EXCITED at her candidacy.
I'm starting to think some people at DU don't know what in the world they are spewing and just repeat what the KochNewz tells 'em to think.
They won't admit their sources o the irrationality of their slogans.
Today we have the liberal icon, no less than Jonah Golberg in GD.
It looks like we are going to do the GOP's dirty tricks for them in turning off Democrts.
Was it this bad in 2007-2008?
I was on another political board then.
kaiden
(1,314 posts)It wasn't this bad in 2007-2008 because Bush was president. Likewise 2003-2004. I think sometimes we Democrats have a tendency to eat our own. For instance, back then, NanceGreggs was a valued member of DU and her opinion mattered and oftimes was revered. After 2008, she left DU for some time because, from what I could glean (I mostly lurk), she supported Barak Obama too well for some people. I am glad she is back. Anyhow, I am old enough to be pragmatic. There was a time when voters DID vote party -- none of this "I vote for the man" stuff. I try to explain to fair weather voters that they should look at each party's platform. The candidate of that party is representing that platform. Like open carry and marriage between one man one woman? The Republicans are your party then, and you should vote for that candidate, because that candidate represents those things that you believe in. Now then, are all candidates personally pure? No. John Hickenlooper is the Democratic governor of Colorado. He is very righteous on social issues, but he has one offputting flaw. Before he was Colorado's first microbrew man, he was a geologist. Consequently, he sides with oil companies on the issue of fracking. Do I get all huffy and NOT vote for him because he is not the ideal Democratic governor? Hell no. I see so many people on this site --good people -- who are falling into that Tea Party purist hole. It pains me to no end. Anyhow, I have to go now to get the livestock up and out for the day and then the drive into Denver to work. I will be back when I can.
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)Last edited Wed Apr 22, 2015, 09:05 AM - Edit history (1)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6545205I can't believe how stupid
--------------------------------------
THinking of changing to this
[url=http://www.servimg.com/view/11715825/1484][img][/img][/url]
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Your sig line is so cute, but I also love the new one! I can hardly wait until this wonderful, competent, brilliant and inspiring woman is sworn in!
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)Because she rigged it to smear O'Malley.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Which also dismisses the need of POC to uh, I don't know... NOT get their spines severed in three places, get their voice box collapsed and die in agony 7 days later, at the age of 25?
It couldn't have anything to do the terrifying collapse of a city on the eastern part of the country, that's been ignored because the GOP has destroyed the government services?
Well, certainly, it's Hillary's fault, afer Obama's fault or ALIENS!
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Its so obvious with the republican code words they use straight from hate radio.
Why the owners of DU put up with is shit is beyond me.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)He will try to be fair until the nomination is done. People who violate the TOS will have posts hidden and even get banned if they go too far too many times. But until then...