HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Government & Elections » Campaigns (Group) » Brown up 9 points on Warr...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Mon Mar 5, 2012, 05:53 PM

Brown up 9 points on Warren?

Just saw this on Hardball. How on earth is it possible that Brown is still ahead of her in Massachusetts?!? What the hell is going on there? She's not Martha Coakley, he just voted for the Blunt amendment and MA is one of, if not the bluest state in the Union. Somebody please help me understand this. We need a win here in November.

6 replies, 1544 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 6 replies Author Time Post
Reply Brown up 9 points on Warren? (Original post)
jerryster Mar 2012 OP
Angry Dragon Mar 2012 #1
unblock Mar 2012 #2
dem644555il Mar 2012 #6
Tarheel_Dem Mar 2012 #3
jerryster Mar 2012 #5
rurallib Mar 2012 #4

Response to jerryster (Original post)

Mon Mar 5, 2012, 06:01 PM

1. A lot of days between now and November

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jerryster (Original post)

Mon Mar 5, 2012, 06:34 PM

2. early polls often have a lot to do with how much money a campaign is pissing away.

i'd be curious to see if warren is simply conserving her capital for a later surge.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to unblock (Reply #2)

Wed Mar 7, 2012, 03:11 AM

6. +100

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jerryster (Original post)

Mon Mar 5, 2012, 06:44 PM

3. It's early, but I do understand the concern, especially with the president doing so well in MA.

Let's hope the national party spends as much money as needed in this race. It would be a shame if Brown came out of this looking like the moderate. Elizabeth may have to do some fine tuning.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tarheel_Dem (Reply #3)

Mon Mar 5, 2012, 07:50 PM

5. You touched on one of my concerns...

re: the national party. In 2010 Ed Schultz prodded Tarryl Clark to admit that the DCCC had not given her any help (read: no money). I'm concerned that the DSCC may take a page out of the same book and decide that whatever money they have needs to be spent elsewhere. In 2010 for the DCCC that meant only to Dems with absolutely safe seats. It was terrible strategy then and it would be worse now.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jerryster (Original post)

Mon Mar 5, 2012, 06:52 PM

4. Blunt will come back to haunt him big time

As will the Limbaugh crap, I hope.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread