Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The missing middle class: NC is not a land of opportunity
America is supposed to be a country where anyone can succeed with talent and hard work, but a major new study shows that’s not true in North Carolina. Indeed, the nationwide study by a group of leading economists reveals that North Carolina has less economic opportunity than nearly any other state.
It turns out that although opportunity varies a lot across the country, it follows predictable patterns. Regions with better schools, more civic and religious engagement and less sprawl have more economic mobility. But that’s not all: Our analysis of the new study data shows that mobility is also strongly connected to the size of the middle class. Simply put, low-income children who grow up in places with big middle classes are more likely to get ahead than those who don’t. In fact, nearly half of the variation in mobility across regions can be explained by the middle class.
That’s bad news for a city like Raleigh, where the size of the middle class and mobility are both well below the national average. If you were born around 1980 and raised in a lower-income family in Raleigh, chances are you’re not making much more now than your parents did when you were growing up. But if Raleigh’s middle class were as large as the average city’s, you’d be earning nearly $5,500 more a year than you do now. When it comes to opportunity, the middle class matters.
The United States has experience building a robust middle class. In the decades after World War II, we created shared prosperity for millions of families by expanding the middle class. This “middle-out” economic strategy recognized that increasing the purchasing power of the American public would increase demand for American products and services and lead to a virtuous cycle of growth. We also asked the wealthy to help fund major public investments in areas like education, infrastructure and scientific research. These investments cost money up front, but they yield big payoffs over time – we continue to reap the benefits of America’s post-war investments every time we attend a class at a community college, drive on the interstate or use the Internet. So although some politicians argue that cutting taxes for the wealthy will “trickle down” and unleash opportunity for everyone else, they’ve got it backward. The new nationwide mobility study – by four economists from Harvard University and the University of California, Berkeley – finds that places with lower state income taxes, especially on the rich, have less mobility.
....
Read more: http://www.newsobserver.com/2013/09/12/3189385/the-missing-middle-class-nc-is.html##storylink=cpy
It turns out that although opportunity varies a lot across the country, it follows predictable patterns. Regions with better schools, more civic and religious engagement and less sprawl have more economic mobility. But that’s not all: Our analysis of the new study data shows that mobility is also strongly connected to the size of the middle class. Simply put, low-income children who grow up in places with big middle classes are more likely to get ahead than those who don’t. In fact, nearly half of the variation in mobility across regions can be explained by the middle class.
That’s bad news for a city like Raleigh, where the size of the middle class and mobility are both well below the national average. If you were born around 1980 and raised in a lower-income family in Raleigh, chances are you’re not making much more now than your parents did when you were growing up. But if Raleigh’s middle class were as large as the average city’s, you’d be earning nearly $5,500 more a year than you do now. When it comes to opportunity, the middle class matters.
The United States has experience building a robust middle class. In the decades after World War II, we created shared prosperity for millions of families by expanding the middle class. This “middle-out” economic strategy recognized that increasing the purchasing power of the American public would increase demand for American products and services and lead to a virtuous cycle of growth. We also asked the wealthy to help fund major public investments in areas like education, infrastructure and scientific research. These investments cost money up front, but they yield big payoffs over time – we continue to reap the benefits of America’s post-war investments every time we attend a class at a community college, drive on the interstate or use the Internet. So although some politicians argue that cutting taxes for the wealthy will “trickle down” and unleash opportunity for everyone else, they’ve got it backward. The new nationwide mobility study – by four economists from Harvard University and the University of California, Berkeley – finds that places with lower state income taxes, especially on the rich, have less mobility.
....
Read more: http://www.newsobserver.com/2013/09/12/3189385/the-missing-middle-class-nc-is.html##storylink=cpy
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
because Medicaid is not being expanded under Obamacare. It wouldn't surprise me in the least if we hit #1 as far as unemployment. We're #3 now, not far off...
