Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Will someone please explain the best way to vote for delegates on the ballot? (Original Post) redwitch Apr 2016 OP
Only vote your candidate delegates Kittycat Apr 2016 #1
That is what I had planned to do. redwitch Apr 2016 #2
No. It's okay :) Kittycat Apr 2016 #3
Thanks Kittycat! redwitch Apr 2016 #4
You know what irritates me? Kittycat Apr 2016 #6
I voted in Queens CO. where LiberalElite Apr 2016 #5
Yeah, this being reported around... The wording should say "up to" 7. So basic that it seems JudyM Apr 2016 #7

Kittycat

(10,493 posts)
1. Only vote your candidate delegates
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 01:01 PM
Apr 2016

You are not required to vote the max for either, even if they have more or less than the max listed

redwitch

(14,940 posts)
2. That is what I had planned to do.
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 01:12 PM
Apr 2016

But have read that voting for all of them cancels out some of them. I suddenly feel stupid.

Kittycat

(10,493 posts)
3. No. It's okay :)
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 01:47 PM
Apr 2016

Don't feel that way, it can be confusing because this only comes up once every four years, and it can change each time.

Depending on the state, district and candidate they will have their delegates assigned to be elected. In primaries they will win proportionate to the vote in each district. If a district has 10 delegates, and Bernie & Hillary split the vote fairly evenly, they would each capture 5 delegates from their own list. If Hillary wine 60%, she would take 6, bernie 4, vice versa. It's not necessary for them to have a full slate, unless they think that they will take a large percent of the district. They might also really want specific people going up - so a certain number might guarantee, because the top vote getters from each of their delegate pool will be the order they are called up.

In Illinois, we had extra delegates on our ballots. They will serve as alternates, if needed. It's a state by state thing It's all good, and comes out in the wash.

Kittycat

(10,493 posts)
6. You know what irritates me?
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 02:03 PM
Apr 2016

I live in a red district. We had 4 coroners on the Republican ballot. None on the Dem ballot. FOUR! I couldn't vote for even one of them, but the one with the most votes will run uncontested in the GE this fall.

Why is that position politicized? I will never understand that. Sigh.

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
5. I voted in Queens CO. where
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 01:56 PM
Apr 2016

There were 12 delegates listed on the right. Bernie's were at the top. He had five.Below them were Clinton's and she had seven The instructions for us in Queens CO. was to vote for any seven. I couldn't see helping her by voting for her delegates so I only voted for Bernie's five. The scanner accepted it.

In the richest, most "exceptional" country in the world,where we are told we're hated for our freedoms, Voting should not be a crazy quilt clusterfuck.
I don't recall ever having to vote for delegates at any time.

JudyM

(29,185 posts)
7. Yeah, this being reported around... The wording should say "up to" 7. So basic that it seems
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 02:33 PM
Apr 2016

intentionally worded to get Bernie voters to add a couple for Clinton..

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»New York»Will someone please expla...