Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,102 posts)
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 03:00 AM Jan 2016

Republican state treasurer says food stamp work requirement makes sense

Gov.-Elect John Bel Edwards is thinking about waiving the requirement that able-bodied adults without dependents get a job, receive job training or perform public service as a condition of receiving food stamps. To waive this requirement would be a mistake. Here’s why.

In 1961, Alderson Muncy was in dire circumstances. A drop in the nation’s demand for coal had cost Muncy his job at a West Virginia mine. He lived in the poorest part of a poor state and had a wife and 13 children to feed.

The poverty in West Virginia touched the hearts of people across America. Muncy and his wife, Chloe, became the first recipients in the U.S. of food stamps. Handed $95 in food stamps, they used just $20 worth. Months later, they started chipping in for the cost of the food stamps after Alderson Muncy got a temporary job. Within six years they were off food stamps altogether after Alderson Muncy found work with the state highway department.

The Muncy family exemplified the founding goal of the food stamp program. The program was never meant to produce a population that is dependent on government assistance. Food stamps are supposed to be temporary, short-term assistance: a bridge, not a parking lot.

Read more: http://www.shreveporttimes.com/story/opinion/2016/01/02/kennedy-food-stamp-work-requirement-makes-sense/78140828/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Republican state treasurer says food stamp work requirement makes sense (Original Post) TexasTowelie Jan 2016 OP
OK Skittles Jan 2016 #1
Republicans should just say what they really mean. Kalidurga Jan 2016 #2
1961... tecelote Jan 2016 #3
Yes lets continue to tax support corporations by paying to little Katashi_itto Jan 2016 #4

Skittles

(153,147 posts)
1. OK
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 03:14 AM
Jan 2016

are they really going to compare an experience in 1961 to what is happening today? NEWSFLASH: Flash forward and Mr. Muncy would STILL be on food stamps after he got his job.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
2. Republicans should just say what they really mean.
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 03:36 AM
Jan 2016

It wouldn't cost them votes. They should just say that we don't care if people are working and they are still facing hunger. We don't care if people are looking for work and can't find it if they are hungry in the meantime we still don't care. If someone is disabled we still don't care, because that guy at Walmart is a really good greater (he probably doesn't make enough to make ends meet and needs food stamps, but we don't care he shoulda worked harder to not be disabled)

tecelote

(5,122 posts)
3. 1961...
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 05:58 AM
Jan 2016

Minimum Wage $1.15
Average Income per year $5,315.00.
Average Cost of new house $12,500.00
Cost of a gallon of Gas 27 cents
Average Cost of a new car $2,850.00
Bacon for 1LB 67 cents
Eggs per dozen 30 cents

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
4. Yes lets continue to tax support corporations by paying to little
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 06:49 AM
Jan 2016

Forcing people to work for food and support a corporation with tax dollars via food stamps. Yeah makes perfect sense. Death to capitalism.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Louisiana»Republican state treasure...