Thu Oct 18, 2012, 09:24 AM
bemildred (67,509 posts)
Prop. 32's real purpose is to cripple labor unions politically
SACRAMENTO — Proposition 32 is stark proof that often you can tell a ballot initiative by its cover.
--- Even a cursory look at Prop. 32 shows that it's about a covey of special interests from the right attacking a rival interest on the left, organized labor. If backers had turned their initiative into an honest debate about curtailing labor muscle — specifically the influence of public employee unions — they would have deserved more serious consideration. But by deciding to phony it up — crafting what they perceived to be the best marketing pitch based on public opinion surveys — they've created a laugher and an insult to the voters' intelligence. http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-cap-prop32-20121018,0,6178583.column
|
11 replies, 603 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| bemildred | Oct 2012 | OP | |
| still_one | Oct 2012 | #1 | |
| xchrom | Oct 2012 | #2 | |
| KamaAina | Oct 2012 | #3 | |
| Gormy Cuss | Oct 2012 | #4 | |
| Cleita | Oct 2012 | #5 | |
| nwliberalkiwi | Oct 2012 | #6 | |
| pinboy3niner | Oct 2012 | #7 | |
| SoapBox | Oct 2012 | #8 | |
| SoapBox | Oct 2012 | #9 | |
| pinboy3niner | Oct 2012 | #10 | |
| Johonny | Oct 2012 | #11 |
Response to bemildred (Original post)
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 09:33 AM
still_one (31,090 posts)
1. Absolutely. It is a fraud. Already voted no on it and sent in my absentee ballot.
Response to bemildred (Original post)
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 09:53 AM
xchrom (90,578 posts)
2. Du rec. Nt
Response to bemildred (Original post)
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 12:59 PM
KamaAina (45,243 posts)
3. No on 32!
|
|
Response to bemildred (Original post)
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 09:22 PM
Gormy Cuss (26,674 posts)
4. Yeah, that one's an easy No. Don't even need the voter guide to aid my understanding of it.
Response to bemildred (Original post)
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 10:27 PM
Cleita (64,541 posts)
5. Yep. I voted against it. I hope
|
the message gets out to vote against it.
|
Response to bemildred (Original post)
Tue Oct 23, 2012, 05:02 AM
nwliberalkiwi (94 posts)
6. DU Has Add for voting Yes on 32
|
WTF is Du up to?!!! They're stabbing us in the back running these rightwing adds. Who at DU made the decision to accept money from the rightwing? Traitors!!!
|
Response to nwliberalkiwi (Reply #6)
Tue Oct 23, 2012, 07:57 AM
pinboy3niner (27,548 posts)
7. Yes, DU admins clearly have a secret RW agenda
|
DU doesn't choose the ads--they're supplied by Google Adsense based on keywords. For contributing ('Star') DU members the ads are blocked. Kick in a small contribution and you won't see the ads. |
Response to pinboy3niner (Reply #7)
Tue Oct 23, 2012, 12:38 PM
SoapBox (5,820 posts)
8. Good post...
Response to bemildred (Original post)
Tue Oct 23, 2012, 12:38 PM
SoapBox (5,820 posts)
9. NOOOOOO on 32.
|
It's such a scam.
|
Response to SoapBox (Reply #9)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:23 AM
pinboy3niner (27,548 posts)
10. +99%
|
NOOOOOO on 32!
|
Response to bemildred (Original post)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:40 AM
Johonny (11,070 posts)
11. the first ad I heard for it was "Teacher unions protecting pedophiles"
|
Yah that's the number one priority of unions... I knew instantly it was a pile of shit. I hate the prop system.
|

