Fri Jul 6, 2012, 01:13 AM
Speck Tater (10,618 posts)
Not Ready for Prime Time
As a beginner I'm not ready for the contest yet, and I don't have the proper equipment yet either. But just for fun I took my 10-year old 2 Mega-pixel pocket-sized point and click down to the river to take some practice shots.
Most of the interesting stuff wasn't on the river, but was found looking back toward the shore, especially under the bridges:
|
15 replies, 963 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| Speck Tater | Jul 2012 | OP | |
| handmade34 | Jul 2012 | #1 | |
| Adsos Letter | Jul 2012 | #2 | |
| handmade34 | Jul 2012 | #3 | |
| Adsos Letter | Jul 2012 | #4 | |
| Speck Tater | Jul 2012 | #5 | |
| Adsos Letter | Jul 2012 | #6 | |
| Speck Tater | Jul 2012 | #7 | |
| ManiacJoe | Jul 2012 | #8 | |
| canonfodder | Jul 2012 | #9 | |
| Speck Tater | Jul 2012 | #10 | |
| Adsos Letter | Jul 2012 | #11 | |
| canonfodder | Jul 2012 | #12 | |
| Speck Tater | Jul 2012 | #13 | |
| canonfodder | Jul 2012 | #14 | |
| alfredo | Jul 2012 | #15 |
Response to Speck Tater (Original post)
Fri Jul 6, 2012, 01:32 AM
handmade34 (9,489 posts)
1. it's not about being ready
|
|
Response to Speck Tater (Original post)
Fri Jul 6, 2012, 01:36 AM
Adsos Letter (13,994 posts)
2. Hey, that last shot has a very cool effect looking through that triangular iron work.
|
I like the coors there too!
|
Response to Adsos Letter (Reply #2)
Fri Jul 6, 2012, 01:43 AM
handmade34 (9,489 posts)
3. the last one
|
is very interesting... I played with it a little (just my lowly Windows program) and like the lines...
(hope you don't mind S. Tater) ![]() |
Response to handmade34 (Reply #3)
Fri Jul 6, 2012, 01:48 AM
Adsos Letter (13,994 posts)
4. Yeah, there's a lot going on in that shot and it's very pleasing to the eye. Lots to look at...
|
Last edited Fri Jul 6, 2012, 01:49 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) without being drawn to any single point. I like it!
Edit: the more I look at it the more i don't want to stop looking at it. |
Response to handmade34 (Reply #3)
Fri Jul 6, 2012, 01:49 AM
Speck Tater (10,618 posts)
5. Nice. No I don't mind. :-)
|
I could play with it in Paintshop Pro. I thought I might try some of them in B&W, or fiddle with the contrast (or both).
|
Response to Speck Tater (Reply #5)
Fri Jul 6, 2012, 01:51 AM
Adsos Letter (13,994 posts)
6. Black & White could be nice, but I find the colors in this very satisfying...
|
This would make a nice poster.
|
Response to Adsos Letter (Reply #6)
Fri Jul 6, 2012, 02:12 AM
Speck Tater (10,618 posts)
7. I tired cropping, saturation, and "sharpen"
|
using Paint Shop Pro.
|
Response to Speck Tater (Reply #7)
Fri Jul 6, 2012, 02:15 AM
ManiacJoe (5,579 posts)
8. Paint Shop Pro is a good alternative the Photoshop.
|
And it uses many of the same plug-ins.
|
Response to Speck Tater (Reply #7)
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 12:52 AM
canonfodder (147 posts)
9. Hard call
|
Handmades version was nice. A bit of cropping that you used, focused subject a bit better.
The eye is definately drawn toward the triangular shape of the support structure. Go back, take some more. |
Response to Speck Tater (Reply #7)
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 05:54 PM
Speck Tater (10,618 posts)
10. OK, I think I got it right this time...
|
Last edited Sun Jul 8, 2012, 05:56 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
I went back and re-took the shot, monochromed it and flipped it 180 degrees to make it look like the light is coming from the sky above rather than from the river below. It's not "reality", but I think it turned out pretty good. On edit: It sort of looks like that "path" of pipes is inviting you to walk into the scene. I think the eye can find it's way through the picture more easily with the light coming from the "right" direction. |
Response to Speck Tater (Reply #10)
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 11:56 PM
Adsos Letter (13,994 posts)
11. This makes a nice shot in monochrome.
|
Good on you for returning to the scene.
There is still something about the original color shot that draws me; even the blown out portions around the original don't really detract from it (for me anyway), I think because the other elements override the natural draw of blown out areas. I guess what I'm trying to say is that cropping to remove those areas also seems to take away a bit from the original, but I'm not sure why. Nice photos in any case. |
Response to Speck Tater (Reply #10)
Tue Jul 10, 2012, 09:03 AM
canonfodder (147 posts)
12. Nice idea
|
It's amazing how well the flip worked.
If you can, please repost it in the RGB color. The green and gray-brown contrast of the first images really caught my eye. |
Response to canonfodder (Reply #12)
Tue Jul 10, 2012, 07:14 PM
Speck Tater (10,618 posts)
13. Here you go
BTW, this was three bracketed exposures combined in the Photomatix HDR program. |
Response to Speck Tater (Reply #13)
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 09:19 AM
canonfodder (147 posts)
14. Yay
|
That just looks cool.
Thanks. |
Response to Speck Tater (Original post)
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 12:02 AM
alfredo (46,565 posts)
15. It's not the camera, it is the "eye" behind it. For display on the internet, you don't
|
need a bunch of mega pixels. I like the photos. The colors, the compositions are very pleasing.
Keep on shooting. BTW, I started with a 3.1 mpx camera. |


