Tue Jan 24, 2012, 05:05 PM
Ptah (25,000 posts)
Crankshaft Shop, circa 1957. {dial up warning}
The biggest and most important part of the engine was made here. The components were partly machined, then shrunk together to make crankshafts of up to 140 tons. These were then machined in the final operation in huge lathe, and afterwards coupled together on a marking table and built into a complete crankshaft of up to 9 cylinders incorporating a thrust shaft. http://www.dieselduck.ca/historical/01%20diesel%20engine/Doxford/works.htm
|
7 replies, 1215 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
| Author | Time | Post | |
| Ptah | Jan 2012 | OP | |
| liberal N proud | Jan 2012 | #1 | |
| trof | Jan 2012 | #2 | |
| Brother Buzz | Jan 2012 | #4 | |
| Mopar151 | Jan 2012 | #5 | |
| BiggJawn | Jan 2012 | #3 | |
| Throd | Jan 2012 | #6 | |
| HopeHoops | Jan 2012 | #7 |
Response to Ptah (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 05:11 PM
liberal N proud (43,652 posts)
1. Cool
|
Thanks for sharing
|
Response to Ptah (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 05:16 PM
trof (43,651 posts)
2. Ah...crankshaft for a ship's engine.
|
I wondered what kind of HUGE engine this was for.
Scrolled down till I saw a HUGE marine propeller. That's a big crankshaft alright. |
Response to trof (Reply #2)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 05:55 PM
Brother Buzz (8,352 posts)
4. Not a single pair of safety glasses in sight, either
|
Just an observation.
|
Response to Brother Buzz (Reply #4)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:35 PM
Mopar151 (6,041 posts)
5. Tools move @~ 90 fpm,
|
About 1 mph. And you work several feet away from the tool on the big stuff.
Not like today.... chips fly halfway across the shop, so hot they burn into your skin when they hit. |
Response to Ptah (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 05:37 PM
BiggJawn (23,051 posts)
3. I love huge engines.
|
Thanks for sharing those!
|
Response to Ptah (Original post)
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 12:29 AM
Throd (3,610 posts)
6. Suddenly my big-block Olds 455 doesn't seem so big anymore.
|
Thank you for sharing that!
|
Response to Throd (Reply #6)
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 09:55 AM
HopeHoops (47,675 posts)
7. Wow. I had a 73 455 4bbl in a Buick Centurian. Funny thing about that...
|
I took the octopus off it and strapped on new wires using the firing sequence. It ran great up until about 45 and I couldn't figure it out. I took it to a mechanic and he swapped two of the wires. This confused me.
Unlike my 68 Galaxie's 390, Buick sequences alternate sides rather than running front to back. The rotor also moves counter-clockwise, not clockwise. I did the transformation on paper when I got home and sure as shit, two of the wires were wrong - THE OTHER SIX WERE CORRECT! Pure chance. I still have the Galaxie, but "The Walrus" went to the great junk yard in the sky over ten years ago. |

