HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » The DU Lounge (Forum) » I am watching 2001: A Spa...

Mon Jun 11, 2012, 10:06 PM

I am watching 2001: A Space Odyssey.

It is 2012 and we are not close to the movie in space travel.

Rats.

33 replies, 2093 views

Thread informationRemove bookmarkTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 33 replies Author Time Post
Reply I am watching 2001: A Space Odyssey. (Original post)
texanwitch Jun 2012 OP
Orrex Jun 2012 #1
texanwitch Jun 2012 #2
Bolo Boffin Jun 2012 #19
Soylent Brice Jun 2012 #32
El Supremo Jun 2012 #3
texanwitch Jun 2012 #4
Flaxbee Jun 2012 #5
Archae Jun 2012 #6
hrmjustin Jun 2012 #22
HopeHoops Jun 2012 #7
pipi_k Jun 2012 #8
HopeHoops Jun 2012 #11
pipi_k Jun 2012 #17
Liberal Veteran Jun 2012 #9
HopeHoops Jun 2012 #10
WhoIsNumberNone Jun 2012 #14
MicaelS Jun 2012 #16
HopeHoops Jun 2012 #29
hedgehog Jun 2012 #31
MiddleFingerMom Jun 2012 #12
WiffenPoof Jun 2012 #13
militant_lib2553 Jun 2012 #21
deutsey Jun 2012 #15
pokerfan Jun 2012 #18
militant_lib2553 Jun 2012 #20
edbermac Jun 2012 #23
WiffenPoof Jun 2012 #25
Archae Jun 2012 #26
Archae Jun 2012 #26
WiffenPoof Jun 2012 #30
Honeycombe8 Jun 2012 #24
pinboy3niner Jun 2012 #28
Initech Jun 2012 #33

Response to texanwitch (Original post)

Mon Jun 11, 2012, 10:25 PM

1. On the plus side, we aren't asked for our Christian names during voice print identification, either

Win some, lose some.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Orrex (Reply #1)

Mon Jun 11, 2012, 10:34 PM

2. I noticed this for the first time, the cost of the video phonecall from the space station to earth.

Last edited Mon Jun 11, 2012, 10:36 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

It was $1.70.

No cellphones.

No personal computers either.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to texanwitch (Reply #2)

Wed Jun 13, 2012, 05:25 PM

19. Back when the movie was made, the $1.70 charge was exorbitant.

It got laughs, it was so high.

Now that gets laughs the other way. So it goes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Orrex (Reply #1)

Fri Jun 15, 2012, 07:14 PM

32. this is an example of why we should be allowed to rec replies. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to texanwitch (Original post)

Mon Jun 11, 2012, 10:40 PM

3. It can only be attributable to human error.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to El Supremo (Reply #3)

Mon Jun 11, 2012, 10:45 PM

4. There are flat screens in the movie.

I remember reading the book back in junior high.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to texanwitch (Original post)

Tue Jun 12, 2012, 02:18 AM

5. My husband knew AC Clarke well ... and Clarke was kinda bummed that

we hadn't progressed as far as he'd hoped in terms of space travel and exploration. And in terms of free energy, etc...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to texanwitch (Original post)

Tue Jun 12, 2012, 02:57 AM

6. The book (not movie) "2010" was better.

The books went downhill from "2010."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Archae (Reply #6)

Wed Jun 13, 2012, 05:52 PM

22. I loved 2010 when I was a kid. But the book was better.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to texanwitch (Original post)

Tue Jun 12, 2012, 10:21 AM

7. Try not to fall asleep at the end. It just goes on, and on, and on, and on.

 

The V-GER (first) Star Trek movie had similar moments.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HopeHoops (Reply #7)

Tue Jun 12, 2012, 10:39 AM

8. It does.

My favorite parts are the beginning with the baboons and the part where HAL9000 gets all evil and Dave Bowman decides to "kill" him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pipi_k (Reply #8)

Tue Jun 12, 2012, 05:52 PM

11. And Hal sings nursery rhymes. It's sad in a way.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HopeHoops (Reply #11)

Wed Jun 13, 2012, 04:58 PM

17. Yep...I always

have very mixed feelings when I see that part.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HopeHoops (Reply #7)

Tue Jun 12, 2012, 11:19 AM

9. Every single time I see V-GER mentioned, I hear the music/sound effect.

Of course, there were good moments in the first movie. I particularly liked the transporter malfunction. "What we got back didn't live long....fortunately."


They did it better in Galaxy Quest.

Jason Nesmith: What? What was that?
Alexander Dane: Uh, nothing.
Jason Nesmith: I heard some squealing or something.
Gwen DeMarco: Oh, no. Everything's fine.
Teb: But the animal is inside out.
Jason Nesmith: I heard that! It turned inside out?

Teb: And it exploded.
Jason Nesmith: Did I just hear that the animal turned inside out, and then it EXPLODED?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal Veteran (Reply #9)

Tue Jun 12, 2012, 05:51 PM

10. "Didn't anyone else see that eye or whatever it was?" - love the movie.

 

It was what SHOULD have happened to the original Star Trek cast. You have to watch it repeatedly to catch the really subtle but hilarious stuff - "But you live with your mother." - "Wow, the floors are so CLEAN!" - "We're screwed." - and don't fail to watch the outtakes on the DVD. That's the only way to understand how Gwen's uniform got so messed up by the end.

"Hey guys, get a room. WHOA! Oh, THAT's not RIGHT!"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HopeHoops (Reply #7)

Wed Jun 13, 2012, 11:48 AM

14. I'll tell you why that is

In the 1970s a second Star Trek TV series was proposed (Almost all the original cast were to return. Except Spock. Go figure.) It never got beyond the embryonic stage. Twelve episodes were outlined for the first season, and several eventually became Next Generation episodes. The pilot, 'In Thy Image' was re-written as the first Star Trek movie. So the reason you have so many long sequences in the V-GER movie is that it was originally a 45 minute script which had to be stretched to two hours.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WhoIsNumberNone (Reply #14)

Wed Jun 13, 2012, 04:35 PM

16. Actually 'In Thy Image' was a recycled script from Roddenberry's

Proposed TV series "Genesis II" titled "Robot's Return."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genesis_II_%28film%29

"Robots Return" - The advanced computers and sophisticated machinery left on a moon of Jupiter by a 1992 NASA expedition have evolved into a new form of robot life and visit Earth in search of the "God" which created their life. They meet Dylan Hunt, formerly of NASA and consider him a messiah. This story idea was later developed into the script for Star Trek: The Motion Picture, and, shares that work's thematic similarities to The Changeling (Star Trek: The Original Series), written by John Meredyth Lucas.


Roddenberry was obsessed with the "Enterprise meets God" trope. He re-used it again with "Q" in ST:TNG.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WhoIsNumberNone (Reply #14)

Thu Jun 14, 2012, 02:43 PM

29. In the original series, they used magnetic clamps to get it into the transporter.

 

Then they beamed it out into space to explode.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HopeHoops (Reply #7)

Fri Jun 15, 2012, 04:27 PM

31. I think the first Star Trek movie was almost ruined

when they left so much of the story on the cutting room floor so Robert Wise could imitate Stanley Kubrik.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to texanwitch (Original post)

Tue Jun 12, 2012, 06:04 PM

12. Check out Spider Robinson's book, "Stardance"... which he co-wrote with his wife, Jeanne...

.
.
.
... who was a choreographer/dancer/novelist in her own right.

.
AMAZING book (it's part of a trilogy, but I can't tell you about 2 & 3).
.
.
.
It's about first contact with aliens who are a race composed of pure energy
who comunicate by movement. Earth sends up a dance troupe that trained
in zero-gravity. They chose to meet us near Pluto.
.
Fantastic book.
.
Robinson (probably the Tom Robbins of the science fiction world) is best-known
for his series of novels/short stories about "Callahan's Place" -- the coolest bar
you could ever hope to find. Ever.
.
.
.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to texanwitch (Original post)

Wed Jun 13, 2012, 11:29 AM

13. "This Conversation Can No Longer Serve A Purpose....Goodbye."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WiffenPoof (Reply #13)

Wed Jun 13, 2012, 05:48 PM

21. one of the best quotes from that film

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to texanwitch (Original post)

Wed Jun 13, 2012, 02:24 PM

15. Check out the Pink Floyd "Echoes" version of 2001's ending

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to texanwitch (Original post)

Wed Jun 13, 2012, 05:14 PM

18. $700B annually for the DoD

vs $17B for NASA. It's not hard to figure out.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to texanwitch (Original post)

Wed Jun 13, 2012, 05:44 PM

20. sad, isn't it?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to texanwitch (Original post)

Wed Jun 13, 2012, 08:56 PM

23. Go here if you like film analysis

Guy in England named Rob Ager does some great work. He used to have a lot of stuff on YouTube but is selling DVD's of his analysis now. Some good stuff on Kubrick films, 2001, Clockwork Orange, Dr Strangelove and The Shining.

http://www.collativelearning.com/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to edbermac (Reply #23)

Thu Jun 14, 2012, 01:54 AM

25. I am a huge....

Kubrick fan. I'm going to the link right now. Thanks for posting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WiffenPoof (Reply #25)


Response to WiffenPoof (Reply #25)

Thu Jun 14, 2012, 02:06 AM

26. I saw an interview with a couple actors, who did Kubrick movies.

The guy was equal parts genius and asshole.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Archae (Reply #26)

Fri Jun 15, 2012, 03:23 PM

30. Well...

A lot of geniuses are assholes. LOL

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to texanwitch (Original post)

Wed Jun 13, 2012, 09:01 PM

24. It seems to be that way in the movies. They always use years that are not far

that are not far enough in the future.

Prometheus, which I just saw, takes place in 2093. It is highly doubtful we'll be flying to different solar systems in 80 years.

OTOH, many things in the movie, like in Orwell's books, came to pass. Cell phones, flat screen TVs, the weird furniture, modernistic style, computers that speak, Skype, and I'm sure some other things I can't think of right now.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to texanwitch (Original post)

Thu Jun 14, 2012, 02:31 AM

28. I'd love to join you, but...



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to texanwitch (Original post)

Fri Jun 15, 2012, 09:02 PM

33. Best theme music ever.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread