HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Video & Multimedia (Forum) » Cops Torch Cabin Where Ch...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 12:20 AM

Cops Torch Cabin Where Christopher Dorner Was Held Up

34 replies, 11324 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 34 replies Author Time Post
Reply Cops Torch Cabin Where Christopher Dorner Was Held Up (Original post)
Purveyor Feb 2013 OP
still_one Feb 2013 #1
Purveyor Feb 2013 #2
still_one Feb 2013 #7
Purveyor Feb 2013 #8
limpyhobbler Feb 2013 #34
pkdu Feb 2013 #3
2naSalit Feb 2013 #4
pkdu Feb 2013 #6
Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #11
robinlynne Feb 2013 #12
pkdu Feb 2013 #18
Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2013 #5
Purveyor Feb 2013 #9
2naSalit Feb 2013 #10
dixiegrrrrl Feb 2013 #15
1monster Feb 2013 #25
Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2013 #16
Downwinder Feb 2013 #13
robinlynne Feb 2013 #14
James48 Feb 2013 #17
darkangel218 Feb 2013 #23
SCVDem Feb 2013 #19
ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2013 #20
SCVDem Feb 2013 #21
ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2013 #22
Bucky Feb 2013 #24
Live and Learn Feb 2013 #26
SCVDem Feb 2013 #28
oldbanjo Feb 2013 #32
Live and Learn Feb 2013 #27
2pooped2pop Feb 2013 #30
Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #29
A Simple Game Feb 2013 #31
Plucketeer Feb 2013 #33

Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 12:23 AM

1. The guy killed a lot of people, including two more today.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to still_one (Reply #1)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 12:25 AM

2. I'm glad he has been eradicated but I can't tolerate the lies as how it went down. eom

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Reply #2)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 12:35 AM

7. I understand. Speaking of misinformation, the initial reports that he had been killed have not been

Confirmed

you are also correct your video is pretty damning since the msm is saying just the opposite

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to still_one (Reply #7)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 12:37 AM

8. If I hadn't heard it live on net scanner, I wouldn't be so worked up about it. The police

obviously thought they were talking on a secure frequency or this would have never be exposed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Reply #8)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 05:20 PM

34. next up, ban the net scanner. It's threat to national security.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 12:29 AM

3. So they decided to burn the building without confirmation of adequate cover on at least 2 sides or

corners of the building from officers preventing escape?

AUFKM ?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pkdu (Reply #3)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 12:30 AM

4. Desperate people

do desperate things... on both sides of that issue it seems.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 2naSalit (Reply #4)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 12:34 AM

6. I agree....but I'm paying taxes in the hope/belief that the police down here are less desperate than

90% of these wackos!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pkdu (Reply #3)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 12:45 AM

11. LAPD have been shooting to kill since the first minute. 64 bullets unloaded at two women

 

who STILL look nothing like one 280 pound black man.

PD didn't care if there might be hostages inside. Some media sources are failing to report that it was the cops who torched the place. Add it up.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pkdu (Reply #3)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 12:49 AM

12. why do you think they did not have the cabin covered?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to robinlynne (Reply #12)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 01:18 AM

18. Because the audio clearly indicates officers saying they don't have full cover of the rear/sides

after the burn order is .given

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 12:32 AM

5. "Fire" could be "Line of fire".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Spitfire of ATJ (Reply #5)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 12:41 AM

9. "Burners deployed and we have a fire"? eom

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Reply #9)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 12:44 AM

10. Sounded like they were

pretty sloppy in their execution of the operation... geeze, I don't ever wonder why I'm so glad I evacuated from Calif long ago.

So there was a basement in the cabin and they didn't have the perimeter secured even after they torched the place...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 2naSalit (Reply #10)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 12:50 AM

15. I just made a copy of the video

just in case it disappers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dixiegrrrrl (Reply #15)


Response to Purveyor (Reply #9)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 01:04 AM

16. I'm not going to buy a heavily edited audio....

At one point they talk about part of the cabin collapsing but that was lifted from their use of the armored dozer that they used.

I saw the thing going past the roadblock still on it's trailer on the news. It was painted military olive drab and had bullet proof windows.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 12:49 AM

13. in the 21st century with hitech weapons and robots we revert to

thousands year old technology, burn them out.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 12:50 AM

14. Did you make this recording? (i.e. do you know it is real?)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 01:12 AM

17. I do believe that is called

Murder.

Setting a fire to kill a civilian, by the way, is a violation of the Geneva 1949 convention if it were military doing the burning.

I see that particular use of fire to be with the intention to kill the occupant of the building. I consider that murder in the first degree.

Yes, he was a bad guy. But murdering him in this fashion was not necessary and in my humble opinion, a flagrant violation of the use of force.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to James48 (Reply #17)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 02:54 AM

23. +10000

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 01:23 AM

19. We lost another officer today

I don't give a rats ass how this fuck was sent packing!

Maybe some of you would feel differently if he was shooting at you!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SCVDem (Reply #19)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 02:21 AM

20. Good.

So I take it you would be ok with the same thing happening to the officers who shot at the elderly Asian women delivering papers? Lets be consistent here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ForgoTheConsequence (Reply #20)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 02:26 AM

21. This was a positive ID!

He also declared war.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SCVDem (Reply #21)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 02:33 AM

22. That doesn't follow your logic.

You made the statement "if he was shooting at you" so would those elderly ladies have been in the right to return shots and set the cops on fire who were shooting at them? They were being shot at. We're still a nation of laws.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ForgoTheConsequence (Reply #22)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 03:10 AM

24. Oh Snap! You just played the "rule of law" card.

That pretty much wins me over every time. I won't cry over Dorner going down. Him not being taken alive was more or less a given (Cenk Uyger called it last week) but it shouldn't have gone down like that. When police resort to burning buildings rather than waiting out a holed up suspect, it cheapens the law; it cheapens our laws. They wanted him dead. It may not be murder, but it sure ain't right.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bucky (Reply #24)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 06:09 AM

26. +1 nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bucky (Reply #24)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 06:10 AM

28. Ar first I thought of Patty Hearst

and the SLA siege.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bucky (Reply #24)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 10:16 AM

32. You are 100% correct,

I didn't know this was one of their options, they need to look at WACO again.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ForgoTheConsequence (Reply #22)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 06:10 AM

27. +1 nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SCVDem (Reply #21)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 09:11 AM

30. how was this a positive id?

And how did they know if he was there alone?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ForgoTheConsequence (Reply #20)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 07:56 AM

29. You equate these two? Man, that's twisted.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SCVDem (Reply #19)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 09:59 AM

31. And there you go.

I don't give a rats ass how this fuck was sent packing!


That's it in a nut shell! That was supposedly the attitude of the police that caused Dorner to eventually go nuts on them.

It is also the reason many if not most civilians don't trust the police.

How do you think this vicious circle can end?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 11:46 AM

33. I've had to deal with our county sheriffs in this central California location.

Our county is the second poorest in the state - and that's reflected in the quality of the deputies here. I hope to hell I NEVER have to depend on them in a clutch situation. These guys make Keystone Cops look downright professional!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread