| Author | Time | Post | |
| Courtesy Flush | Jan 2012 | OP | |
| yodermon | Jan 2012 | #1 | |
| yellerpup | Jan 2012 | #2 | |
| teddy51 | Jan 2012 | #3 | |
| KansDem | Jan 2012 | #4 | |
| qb | Jan 2012 | #5 | |
| lumpy | Jan 2012 | #6 | |
| baldguy | Jan 2012 | #7 | |
| Plucketeer | Jan 2012 | #8 | |
| FailureToCommunicate | Jan 2012 | #9 | |
| Plucketeer | Jan 2012 | #10 | |
| julian09 | Jan 2012 | #11 |
Response to Courtesy Flush (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 01:13 PM
yodermon (4,768 posts)
1. Respect mah authoritaaah!
|
Last edited Tue Jan 24, 2012, 01:13 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) ![]() |
Response to Courtesy Flush (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 01:14 PM
yellerpup (10,920 posts)
2. Fashion Police run amok.
|
The officer is seriously misinformed if he thinks the Supreme Court has ruled on federal dress codes.
|
Response to Courtesy Flush (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 01:16 PM
teddy51 (3,491 posts)
3. Certainly tells you that our system is seriously screwed up when they can arrest you
|
for wearing a jacket that says; "Occupy Everywhere".
|
Response to Courtesy Flush (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 01:21 PM
KansDem (24,333 posts)
4. Don't want to upset the Supreme Koch's "Just-us-es"
|
This fellow doesn't understand why he has to leave and wants to know the definition of "unlawful entry" and gets arrested.
Clarence Thomas doesn't understand the simple instructions on a disclosure form about his wife's income so he leaves it blank but continues to pull his six-digit salary and perks... |
Response to Courtesy Flush (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 02:15 PM
qb (5,924 posts)
5. How perfectly appropriate for this to happen at this Supreme Court.
|
If he'd had a wad of money to hand to the cop, that would be free speech allowed by the Supreme Court.
|
Response to Courtesy Flush (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 02:17 PM
lumpy (12,139 posts)
6. Goddamnit ! Disgusting. We are on the hinges of fascism.
|
Makes my blood boil.
|
Response to Courtesy Flush (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 02:22 PM
baldguy (30,509 posts)
7. It took 9 cops to do that?
Response to baldguy (Reply #7)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 02:56 PM
Plucketeer (6,277 posts)
8. Sure
|
TWO of them to perpetrate the arrest, and severn more to keep any witnesses in line.
|
Response to baldguy (Reply #7)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 03:04 PM
FailureToCommunicate (4,399 posts)
9. Looks at one point like they're posing for snapshots with the guy?!?
Response to Courtesy Flush (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 03:05 PM
Plucketeer (6,277 posts)
10. Next step
|
Last edited Tue Jan 24, 2012, 03:08 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) will be surveillance drones making sure you don't wear such garb within sight of anyone else.
Here we are - WATCHING as our "freedoms" are apprehended - and professing our disgust for it. Fussing about it as German Jews must've done in what little sanctum their homes afforded in the late 30s. We need to invade Washington DC - rout the brown shirts - including the president - and reinstitute the freedoms our founding documents profess to afford us. Otherwise - we're FUCKED. Fucked cowards, sheeple, lemmings, whatever. Edit: I post this - full well realizing it's alerted some robot monitor somewhere. Tough shit for me - tough shit for whoever reviews my percieved threat to our corporatocracy. |
Response to Plucketeer (Reply #10)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 03:22 PM
julian09 (1,435 posts)
11. What happened to freedom of speech?


