Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
| Author | Time | Post | |
| celtics23 | Nov 2012 | OP | |
| PatrynXX | Nov 2012 | #1 | |
| 02potato | Nov 2012 | #2 | |
| jonthebru | Nov 2012 | #4 | |
| 02potato | Nov 2012 | #6 | |
| pathansen | Nov 2012 | #3 | |
| Up2Late | Nov 2012 | #5 | |
| politrixjunkie | Nov 2012 | #7 | |
| Quantess | Dec 2012 | #8 |
Response to celtics23 (Original post)
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 07:21 PM
PatrynXX (2,620 posts)
1. must say their math dept is mucked up
|
how is 8.6 higher than 8.8 o_O
if the above were true Mitt Romney would be pres. because his 47 % for be more than Obama's 51 % |
Response to celtics23 (Original post)
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 07:23 PM
02potato (148 posts)
2. both left and right
|
He could of done a much better job explaining this.
Both left and right do this if it will serve them. "there are lies, damned lies, and statistics" (Samuel Langhorne Clemens) |
Response to 02potato (Reply #2)
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 08:41 PM
jonthebru (989 posts)
4. Nobody does it like Fox News.
|
False equivalency does not fly well, it crashes to the ground.
These are quickly shown on the TV and people who see the graphic aren't given the time to study as it is part of a whole presentation with misleading copy being read at the same time. Critical thinking is important and many people are not using it right now. |
Response to jonthebru (Reply #4)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 08:35 AM
02potato (148 posts)
6. I use murdochblock on my browser...
Response to celtics23 (Original post)
pathansen This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to celtics23 (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 03:49 AM
Up2Late (17,792 posts)
5. Yup, like I wrote at the facebook post about this
|
A LOT of us already noticed this a long time ago, which is why we don't trust or watch Fox "news."
|
Response to celtics23 (Original post)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 12:10 PM
politrixjunkie (42 posts)
7. and the uneducated and undereducated
|
Last edited Fri Nov 30, 2012, 12:12 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) will buy it hook, line, and sinker.
Now, if your point of view is so valid, there should be NO reason to resort to trickery and misleading charts! Edited to add: Oh - I'm a researcher/wonk so seeing this type of "journalism" boils my blood! |

