HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Video & Multimedia (Forum) » Great Global Warming Swin...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Mon Nov 26, 2012, 01:49 PM

Great Global Warming Swindle ABC Debates Part 3/9

This is just a peek but this video shows very clearly how fucking corrupt the makers of the Great Global Warming Swindle are.



7 replies, 1049 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 7 replies Author Time Post
Reply Great Global Warming Swindle ABC Debates Part 3/9 (Original post)
Quixote1818 Nov 2012 OP
JDPriestly Nov 2012 #1
limpyhobbler Nov 2012 #2
AsahinaKimi Nov 2012 #3
blackspade Nov 2012 #4
efhmc Nov 2012 #5
fasttense Nov 2012 #6
KurtNYC Nov 2012 #7

Response to Quixote1818 (Original post)

Mon Nov 26, 2012, 02:27 PM

1. Unbelievable. The anti-climate-change film, Great Warming Swindle is quite

inaccurate in a number of respects, and its maker knows it and kind of seems to be having fun trying to hoodwink the public for fame and fortune.

Maybe I'm being unfair, but when confronted about obvious failings and discrepancies in his movie, he just sort of shrugs it off and kind of laughs about it. He trivializes the gross errors in his movie. He seems to be saying, well what do you expect? You didn't think I was trying to make a scientifically sound film, did you? Why in the world should I?

It is one thing for someone to make a mistake and admit to it and try to do better. But when someone is shown evidence about omitted information or falsehoods in a film about a scientific topic and fails to apologize or correct his errors, then you begin to ask whether that person has any scientific credibility at all.

I wonder who funded the Great Warming Swindle?

Sounds like the Great Warming Swindle movie might be the real swindle.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Quixote1818 (Original post)

Mon Nov 26, 2012, 05:52 PM

2. oh my.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Quixote1818 (Original post)

Mon Nov 26, 2012, 06:50 PM

3. I have a feeling he would

never admit he's wrong. Why is that not surprising?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Quixote1818 (Original post)

Mon Nov 26, 2012, 09:51 PM

4. what a lying sack of crap.

This is one of the reasons that we are in an ecological freefall; the deliberate misrepresentation of science.
It causes confusion and doubt where none should exist.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Quixote1818 (Original post)

Mon Nov 26, 2012, 10:17 PM

5. Did you mean peek? Or am I mssing the point?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Quixote1818 (Original post)

Wed Nov 28, 2012, 10:05 AM

6. They did this documentary based on scientific data,

put it out there and just hoped it was right?

What a crock of crap. Puts out a graph to prove his fake point that has a big gap in it.

Puts out a graph to prove his point that stops in the 1980s but claims it represents current data.

I wonder how much money big oil paid him to do this fake documentary?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Quixote1818 (Original post)

Wed Nov 28, 2012, 12:41 PM

7. I think when we focus on deniers we help keep the "debate" alive

It would be more productive to move on to actions and solutions.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread