| Author | Time | Post | |
| EarlG | Jul 2012 | OP | |
| DainBramaged | Jul 2012 | #1 | |
| annabanana | Jul 2012 | #2 | |
| onehandle | Jul 2012 | #3 | |
| The Wielding Truth | Jul 2012 | #19 | |
| synapticwave | Jul 2012 | #21 | |
| AlbertCat | Jul 2012 | #4 | |
| nichomachus | Jul 2012 | #6 | |
| rhett o rick | Jul 2012 | #7 | |
| AlbertCat | Jul 2012 | #58 | |
| rhett o rick | Jul 2012 | #59 | |
| Indydem | Jul 2012 | #5 | |
| AllyCat | Jul 2012 | #10 | |
| Indydem | Jul 2012 | #13 | |
| PotatoChip | Jul 2012 | #17 | |
| Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel | Jul 2012 | #30 | |
| A Simple Game | Jul 2012 | #33 | |
| MADem | Jul 2012 | #53 | |
| patricia92243 | Jul 2012 | #57 | |
| AllyCat | Jul 2012 | #55 | |
| bayareaboy | Jul 2012 | #8 | |
| HopeHoops | Jul 2012 | #9 | |
| blm | Jul 2012 | #27 | |
| Bainbridge Bear | Jul 2012 | #29 | |
| Raster | Jul 2012 | #44 | |
| chknltl | Jul 2012 | #54 | |
| Baitball Blogger | Jul 2012 | #11 | |
| SemperEadem | Jul 2012 | #12 | |
| BlancheSplanchnik | Jul 2012 | #14 | |
| HereSince1628 | Jul 2012 | #15 | |
| bongbong | Jul 2012 | #22 | |
| HereSince1628 | Jul 2012 | #42 | |
| Brewinblue | Jul 2012 | #16 | |
| disndat | Jul 2012 | #18 | |
| tclambert | Jul 2012 | #45 | |
| rgbecker | Jul 2012 | #20 | |
| LittleGirl | Jul 2012 | #41 | |
| BanTheGOP | Jul 2012 | #23 | |
| LiberalLovinLug | Jul 2012 | #40 | |
| Atman | Jul 2012 | #24 | |
| Rainngirl | Jul 2012 | #25 | |
| ejbr | Jul 2012 | #26 | |
| MADem | Jul 2012 | #28 | |
| Amonester | Jul 2012 | #31 | |
| aquart | Jul 2012 | #34 | |
| aquart | Jul 2012 | #37 | |
| patrice | Jul 2012 | #39 | |
| AllyCat | Jul 2012 | #56 | |
| patrice | Jul 2012 | #32 | |
| GeorgeGist | Jul 2012 | #35 | |
| patrice | Jul 2012 | #38 | |
| patrice | Jul 2012 | #36 | |
| Bolo Boffin | Jul 2012 | #43 | |
| toddwv | Jul 2012 | #46 | |
| Stuart G | Jul 2012 | #47 | |
| Spitfire of ATJ | Jul 2012 | #48 | |
| liberal N proud | Jul 2012 | #49 | |
| drynberg | Jul 2012 | #50 | |
| Stuart G | Jul 2012 | #51 | |
| steve2470 | Jul 2012 | #52 |
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:18 PM
DainBramaged (37,819 posts)
1. 1000 recs
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:19 PM
annabanana (45,567 posts)
2. yep.. REAL easy to make these questions go away.. . . .n/t
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:20 PM
onehandle (35,429 posts)
3. 25 years ago someone broke into my car and stole my new tennis shoes.
|
Last edited Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:20 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Did Mitt Romney do it?
He hasn't denied it. Why? |
Response to onehandle (Reply #3)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 01:45 PM
The Wielding Truth (8,438 posts)
19. If he lied to the SEC about it then even that would be a big deal.
Response to onehandle (Reply #3)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 01:48 PM
synapticwave (42 posts)
21. Possibly
|
Is he running on a platform that includes fixing the economy by cracking down on auto break-ins and shoe theft?
|
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:21 PM
AlbertCat (10,450 posts)
4. The loaded question ad
|
When did he stop beating his wife?
Hate it. It's like Fox News prepared it. |
Response to AlbertCat (Reply #4)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:29 PM
nichomachus (10,085 posts)
6. Actually, not at all like that
|
Silly comparison
|
Response to AlbertCat (Reply #4)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:37 PM
rhett o rick (26,685 posts)
7. Bad analogy. The question is clearly, "Why arent you showing your tax returns? Should we guess?" nm
Response to rhett o rick (Reply #7)
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 12:12 PM
AlbertCat (10,450 posts)
58. "Why arent you showing your tax returns? Should we guess?"
|
I'm all for that question. It is a fair one.
It's the speculation I don't like. I suppose it's only natural... I mean I'm doing it. But there's no need to make something up. The fact Rmoney thinks he needs to hide his tax returns is really all one NEEDS to know. |
Response to AlbertCat (Reply #58)
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 01:14 PM
rhett o rick (26,685 posts)
59. I think the speculation might open some people's eyes as to what Romney might be hiding. nm
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:21 PM
Indydem (1,625 posts)
5. None of your damn business.
|
That's why.
|
Response to Indydem (Reply #5)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:46 PM
AllyCat (7,520 posts)
10. Really? It's a public document. Everyone else running has provided this info
|
including George Romney. And he's released it before to McCain. What is the issue now?
|
Response to AllyCat (Reply #10)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:54 PM
Indydem (1,625 posts)
13. It is not a public document.
|
It is a confidential document filed between an individual and the IRS.
I wasn't trying to defend Romney, I was trying to make a statement as the repukes would answer it, but you can't say false things like "it's a public document" and not get a response. |
Response to Indydem (Reply #13)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 01:25 PM
PotatoChip (1,527 posts)
17. Well, whether it is a public document or not is irrelevant.
|
Last edited Mon Jul 16, 2012, 01:39 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) The point is that Presidential candidates have been providing these documents for scrutiny for decades now. A precedent has been set. The general public expects to be able see this information. Even if it is not a specific requirement.
The fact that Romney refuses to be forthcoming w/this info has got to make people (even repukes) wonder what he is trying to hide. |
Response to PotatoChip (Reply #17)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 02:35 PM
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel (3,176 posts)
30. +1
Response to PotatoChip (Reply #17)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 03:16 PM
A Simple Game (4,834 posts)
33. A precedent has been set. Maybe Romney wants to set a new precedent.
|
A precedent has been set. Was that back when votes counted more than money?
No law saying he has to release the papers. No law says we have to vote for him. |
Response to PotatoChip (Reply #17)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 09:37 PM
MADem (85,981 posts)
53. He provided two decades' worth to McCain in his lust for VP-licious power!
|
Whatever McCain saw in those things made him say "Fuck that bastard" and pick PALIN instead!!!!
|
Response to MADem (Reply #53)
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 11:06 AM
patricia92243 (7,550 posts)
57. I didn't know that he realeased two decades of returns to McCain.
|
Sooo - somebody needs to get McCains camp to "leak" the information to the public.
|
Response to Indydem (Reply #13)
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 01:38 AM
AllyCat (7,520 posts)
55. Maybe it's not "public" but employers have started asking for it.
|
In this economy, they figure they can get away with all kinds of things because people what the job. For example:
[link:http://www.sfgate.com/business/article/Employers-asking-job-seekers-for-W-2-or-tax-return-3530180.php| |
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:38 PM
bayareaboy (585 posts)
8. So how do we do this?
|
I like this, of the seven questions listed how about yes or no on each item or what? So what is the prize we all can win for doing this perhaps a Mitt and the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rendition of Gold Bless America? |
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:38 PM
HopeHoops (47,675 posts)
9. I think the simple answer is that he KNOWS he's a felon.
Response to HopeHoops (Reply #9)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 02:07 PM
blm (89,637 posts)
27. WORSE - he should be in jail for INSURANCE FRAUD. EarlG needs to do a graphic pointing to it
Response to HopeHoops (Reply #9)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 02:27 PM
Bainbridge Bear (155 posts)
29. Remember the old adage
|
that behind every great fortune there lies a great crime. In Willard's case it might be several. It would be a great pleasure for me to see the campaign of this arrogant, corrupt, and greedy POS implode.
|
Response to Bainbridge Bear (Reply #29)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 05:47 PM
Raster (12,615 posts)
44. Welcome to DU!
|
Federal Way here!
|
Response to Bainbridge Bear (Reply #29)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 10:45 PM
chknltl (8,738 posts)
54. Welcome to DU. am1090 listener from Tacoma here as well.
|
|
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:46 PM
Baitball Blogger (11,260 posts)
11. All of the Above.
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:52 PM
SemperEadem (7,996 posts)
12. who was running Bain when he was not running it
|
but still being paid as if he was running it?
Funny how he keeps leaving that easy little piece of information out. If it wasn't you, then give us the name of the person who WAS running it. and why hasn't anyone in the MSM asked him that question instead of letting him leave it at "I left the company in 1999 to run the olympics"? |
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:59 PM
BlancheSplanchnik (7,705 posts)
14. KnR
|
scum, he is!
|
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 01:00 PM
HereSince1628 (26,665 posts)
15. I'd bet for the same reason he keeps the Bermuda company with a value of ~$10,500
|
And I'd bet that reason looks nothing like its face value.
|
Response to HereSince1628 (Reply #15)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 01:56 PM
bongbong (5,436 posts)
22. Some say
|
Some say he keeps that pitifully tiny company around because it is a front for the hookers, slaves, and drug business that supply repig big wigs 24x7.
|
Response to bongbong (Reply #22)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 05:11 PM
HereSince1628 (26,665 posts)
42. I suspect it works much like a piece of copper tubing on a still
|
not worth much on it's own, but over the years a very profitable conduit for directing certain high yield products
|
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 01:23 PM
Brewinblue (180 posts)
16. Why?
|
Because he doesn't want to go to prison.
|
Response to Brewinblue (Reply #16)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 01:36 PM
disndat (1,372 posts)
18. Remember Leona Helmsley?
|
She said something to the effect, "I don't pay taxes, other people pay taxes."
|
Response to disndat (Reply #18)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 06:27 PM
tclambert (5,529 posts)
45. "We don't pay taxes. Only the little people pay taxes." - Leona Helmsley aka inmate #15113-054
|
I found it in Wikiquotes. They cite the New York Times and Newsweek as their sources. Her Federal Bureau of Prisons number came from Wikipedia. (I loves the wikis.)
|
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 01:47 PM
rgbecker (2,210 posts)
20. I can hear it now: "I am not a crook." n/t
Response to rgbecker (Reply #20)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 04:38 PM
LittleGirl (858 posts)
41. My first thought
|
Because he's a crook, that's why?
|
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 01:59 PM
BanTheGOP (1,028 posts)
23. Eric Holder should arrest and frogmarch Romney's ass on NBCNews.com
|
That would ensure Obama's reelection, and perhaps start a slew of arrests of rethug millionaires and billionaires.
QUESTION: When would be the best time to actually arrest the bastard? |
Response to BanTheGOP (Reply #23)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 04:25 PM
LiberalLovinLug (2,024 posts)
40. Good question, even if it is hypothetical
|
We all know he will never be arrested, never be charged, and will live out his life with other criminals like Cheney and Rove in the lap of luxury.
But...IF some series of flukes occurred where some underling investigator, who wasn't in on the game, accidentally filed an irreversible charge and by some other fluke a rare journalist with integrity working for MSM let the cat out of the bag... When to arrest him? It would have to be a couple of days before the election. Hell, maybe even after, as I think Obama has it anyways. If the GOP had a couple of months or more they'd ride Jeb Bush or Chris Christie in on a white stallion. A lot of Freepers would be cheering like it was the second coming. |
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 02:01 PM
Atman (26,064 posts)
24. FB'd
|
Let's go viral, baby!
|
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 02:01 PM
Rainngirl (141 posts)
25. When he released
|
his returns to John McCain, John McCain went with Palin! There must be something really bad in there for him to choose that loon over Romney!
|
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 02:02 PM
ejbr (3,953 posts)
26. Why, Mittens, WHY? n/t
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 02:16 PM
MADem (85,981 posts)
28. I hope Obama's team reads DU because I have something to say about this.
|
Mitt Romney received a HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION on his Utah home while he was running those Olympics and the fact was brought up when he was trying to claim he was a Massachusetts resident. Now, as we all know, you can only get one of those if you are a RESIDENT of a state (I pay a few hundred on a shack I have in rural Maine, that would only cost me fifteen bucks or so if I lived there instead of vacationed there).
There was an ENORMOUS stink made at the time--the whole "carpetbagger" and "bullshitter" and "out of state asshole" charges were flying around....and at the time, Mittsy wasn't sure if he was gonna run for governor of Utah or MA. If I recall, a court ruled on Mittsy's residency and they ruled in his favor--so he went out of his way to "prove" that he was a Massachusettsian. Why is he trying to pretend otherwise, now? This is not a secret, but it is one of those things that is kind of buried in the mists of time. The Globe Spotlight people reported on it--it got a lot of play when it was revealed...to the point that Mittsy made public statements blaming unnamed accountants and he paid the full amount of taxes and maybe even a penalty fee. I think that a review of public records with regard to Mittsy's residences might be revealing...but what this incident points out is that the guy will lie and flip-flop with sociopathic abandon, and he is one cheap asshole, that a man as wealthy as he is can't even cough up the lousy full freight for his property taxes. I see the Globe is revisiting this, despite it getting scant attention, but it just shows that this guy will say ANYTHING to gain advantage: http://articles.boston.com/2012-07-13/opinion/32646257_1_tax-returns-mitt-romney-income-taxes How Romney had filed his Massachusetts income taxes — as a resident or non-resident — during his years in Utah could have had some bearing on the issue. Since he had also been contemplating a run for office in Utah, some suspected he might have filed as resident there to establish more permanent roots in the Beehive State. Romney initially refused to make a copy of his Massachusetts tax returns public, even a copy with the income information redacted. Suspicions only grew more intense after the Globe’s Frank Phillips reported that Romney had paid property taxes on his Park City, Utah, home as his primary residence for 1999, 2000, and 2001. Campaign aide Eric Fehrnstrom said that had happened because of a “clerical mistake” by the relevant county assessor’s office in Utah, an account that office pretty much backed up, though no one could say quite how the unusual error had occurred. At the time of the property tax brouhaha, Romney told reporters he had filed his state income taxes “both as a resident of Utah and a resident of Massachusetts.” Pressed by Phillips, Fehrnstrom also insisted Romney had filed as a Massachusetts resident, adding that “you are just going to have to take my word for it.” And how accurate were Romney and Fehrnstrom’s assertions? Well, though technically true, they stopped several fathoms short of being straightforward. We know that because, with state Democrats posed to push forward with a residency challenge, Romney suddenly reversed course. He called reporters to his campaign headquarters, where he acknowledged that he had initially filed his Massachusetts taxes as part-time resident for 1999 and a nonresident for 2000. Once a liar, always a liar. We could actually take a page from Dubya's book, here--Fool me once, won't git fooled agin!!! |
Response to MADem (Reply #28)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 02:38 PM
Amonester (10,169 posts)
31. Here's the Barack Obama Campaign's Contact page:
|
(In case his team members don't read DU.)
http://www.barackobama.com/contact-us?source=footer-nav K&R |
Response to MADem (Reply #28)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 03:22 PM
aquart (67,535 posts)
34. What a cheap, cheesy putz.
Response to MADem (Reply #28)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 03:35 PM
aquart (67,535 posts)
37. Tell our friends at MSNBC. All of them.
|
@maddowblog, @lawrence (only two I know).
|
Response to MADem (Reply #28)
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 10:44 AM
AllyCat (7,520 posts)
56. If this is not already an OP it should be!
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 03:07 PM
patrice (47,372 posts)
32. What we would see is: A big fat circle of 0s and 1s that PRODUCE NOTHING but more 0s and 1s.
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 03:33 PM
GeorgeGist (9,538 posts)
35. Romney may be performing an act of 'Noblesse oblige'.
|
Digging his own grave.
|
Response to GeorgeGist (Reply #35)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 03:35 PM
patrice (47,372 posts)
38. Ah, but the "Corn King" ALWAYS returns. nt
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 05:19 PM
Bolo Boffin (22,518 posts)
43. President Obama should offer Mitt a pardon for any misdeeds in L'Affaire Bain
|
And let's see if Mitt will accept it.
|
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 06:30 PM
toddwv (2,054 posts)
46. What I find ironic:
|
I think it is HILARIOUS and a bit of justice that the right-wing's smear template against President Obama ala the birthers, is being used against the GOP's #1.
Don't take this as a criticism. While the birthers' efforts over the past 4 years have returned nothing but a few misquoted statements and some blatant forgery hoaxes, Romney Bain issue is bringing up pay dirt because the vetting of Romney is making the right-wingers desperate as they realize that they have been snookered by their corporate masters. The chickens are coming home to roost, and they are pooping all over the heads of Romney supporters and not-so-supporters everywhere. Lol. |
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 07:19 PM
Stuart G (7,672 posts)
47. Thom Hartmann quoted from this list today..
|
It was in the first hour of his show, and read it, and gave credit to Democratic Underground..
Yes..I heard it on the radio... |
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 08:13 PM
Spitfire of ATJ (7,361 posts)
48. Thiis would make a good slideshow commercial.
|
A lot of people are trading pdfs and ppts.
|
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 08:34 PM
liberal N proud (43,696 posts)
49. He has something to hide.
|
That is the only reason why he is not releasing them.
McCain who saw his tax returns has yet to come to his defense. |
Response to EarlG (Original post)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 09:15 PM
drynberg (487 posts)
50. MITTENS, YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE
|
truth, 'cause it ain't gonna set your lying ass free, oh no...but the truth, like cream will rise and be seen by all (I can hardly wait). Oh, when Bad things happen to Bad People...Should be rich.
|
Response to drynberg (Reply #50)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 09:17 PM
Stuart G (7,672 posts)


