HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Video & Multimedia (Forum) » Pic Of The Moment: Think ...

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:17 PM

Pic Of The Moment: Think About It

59 replies, 9916 views

Thread informationRemove bookmarkTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 59 replies Author Time Post
Reply Pic Of The Moment: Think About It (Original post)
EarlG Jul 2012 OP
DainBramaged Jul 2012 #1
annabanana Jul 2012 #2
onehandle Jul 2012 #3
The Wielding Truth Jul 2012 #19
synapticwave Jul 2012 #21
AlbertCat Jul 2012 #4
nichomachus Jul 2012 #6
rhett o rick Jul 2012 #7
AlbertCat Jul 2012 #58
rhett o rick Jul 2012 #59
Indydem Jul 2012 #5
AllyCat Jul 2012 #10
Indydem Jul 2012 #13
PotatoChip Jul 2012 #17
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel Jul 2012 #30
A Simple Game Jul 2012 #33
MADem Jul 2012 #53
patricia92243 Jul 2012 #57
AllyCat Jul 2012 #55
bayareaboy Jul 2012 #8
HopeHoops Jul 2012 #9
blm Jul 2012 #27
Bainbridge Bear Jul 2012 #29
Raster Jul 2012 #44
chknltl Jul 2012 #54
Baitball Blogger Jul 2012 #11
SemperEadem Jul 2012 #12
BlancheSplanchnik Jul 2012 #14
HereSince1628 Jul 2012 #15
bongbong Jul 2012 #22
HereSince1628 Jul 2012 #42
Brewinblue Jul 2012 #16
disndat Jul 2012 #18
tclambert Jul 2012 #45
rgbecker Jul 2012 #20
LittleGirl Jul 2012 #41
BanTheGOP Jul 2012 #23
LiberalLovinLug Jul 2012 #40
Atman Jul 2012 #24
Rainngirl Jul 2012 #25
ejbr Jul 2012 #26
MADem Jul 2012 #28
Amonester Jul 2012 #31
aquart Jul 2012 #34
aquart Jul 2012 #37
patrice Jul 2012 #39
AllyCat Jul 2012 #56
patrice Jul 2012 #32
GeorgeGist Jul 2012 #35
patrice Jul 2012 #38
patrice Jul 2012 #36
Bolo Boffin Jul 2012 #43
toddwv Jul 2012 #46
Stuart G Jul 2012 #47
Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2012 #48
liberal N proud Jul 2012 #49
drynberg Jul 2012 #50
Stuart G Jul 2012 #51
steve2470 Jul 2012 #52

Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:18 PM

1. 1000 recs

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:19 PM

2. yep.. REAL easy to make these questions go away.. . . .n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:20 PM

3. 25 years ago someone broke into my car and stole my new tennis shoes.

Last edited Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:20 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

Did Mitt Romney do it?

He hasn't denied it.

Why?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onehandle (Reply #3)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 01:45 PM

19. If he lied to the SEC about it then even that would be a big deal.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onehandle (Reply #3)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 01:48 PM

21. Possibly

Is he running on a platform that includes fixing the economy by cracking down on auto break-ins and shoe theft?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:21 PM

4. The loaded question ad

When did he stop beating his wife?

Hate it. It's like Fox News prepared it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AlbertCat (Reply #4)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:29 PM

6. Actually, not at all like that

Silly comparison

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AlbertCat (Reply #4)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:37 PM

7. Bad analogy. The question is clearly, "Why arent you showing your tax returns? Should we guess?" nm

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #7)

Tue Jul 17, 2012, 12:12 PM

58. "Why arent you showing your tax returns? Should we guess?"

I'm all for that question. It is a fair one.

It's the speculation I don't like. I suppose it's only natural... I mean I'm doing it. But there's no need to make something up. The fact Rmoney thinks he needs to hide his tax returns is really all one NEEDS to know.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AlbertCat (Reply #58)

Tue Jul 17, 2012, 01:14 PM

59. I think the speculation might open some people's eyes as to what Romney might be hiding. nm

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:21 PM

5. None of your damn business.

That's why.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Indydem (Reply #5)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:46 PM

10. Really? It's a public document. Everyone else running has provided this info

including George Romney. And he's released it before to McCain. What is the issue now?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AllyCat (Reply #10)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:54 PM

13. It is not a public document.

It is a confidential document filed between an individual and the IRS.

I wasn't trying to defend Romney, I was trying to make a statement as the repukes would answer it, but you can't say false things like "it's a public document" and not get a response.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Indydem (Reply #13)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 01:25 PM

17. Well, whether it is a public document or not is irrelevant.

Last edited Mon Jul 16, 2012, 01:39 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

The point is that Presidential candidates have been providing these documents for scrutiny for decades now. A precedent has been set. The general public expects to be able see this information. Even if it is not a specific requirement.

The fact that Romney refuses to be forthcoming w/this info has got to make people (even repukes) wonder what he is trying to hide.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to PotatoChip (Reply #17)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 03:16 PM

33. A precedent has been set. Maybe Romney wants to set a new precedent.

A precedent has been set. Was that back when votes counted more than money?

No law saying he has to release the papers. No law says we have to vote for him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PotatoChip (Reply #17)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 09:37 PM

53. He provided two decades' worth to McCain in his lust for VP-licious power!

Whatever McCain saw in those things made him say "Fuck that bastard" and pick PALIN instead!!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MADem (Reply #53)

Tue Jul 17, 2012, 11:06 AM

57. I didn't know that he realeased two decades of returns to McCain.

Sooo - somebody needs to get McCains camp to "leak" the information to the public.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Indydem (Reply #13)

Tue Jul 17, 2012, 01:38 AM

55. Maybe it's not "public" but employers have started asking for it.

In this economy, they figure they can get away with all kinds of things because people what the job. For example:

[link:http://www.sfgate.com/business/article/Employers-asking-job-seekers-for-W-2-or-tax-return-3530180.php|

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:38 PM

8. So how do we do this?


I like this, of the seven questions listed how about yes or no on each item or what?

So what is the prize we all can win for doing this perhaps a Mitt and the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rendition of Gold Bless America?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:38 PM

9. I think the simple answer is that he KNOWS he's a felon.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HopeHoops (Reply #9)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 02:07 PM

27. WORSE - he should be in jail for INSURANCE FRAUD. EarlG needs to do a graphic pointing to it

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HopeHoops (Reply #9)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 02:27 PM

29. Remember the old adage

 

that behind every great fortune there lies a great crime. In Willard's case it might be several. It would be a great pleasure for me to see the campaign of this arrogant, corrupt, and greedy POS implode.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bainbridge Bear (Reply #29)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 05:47 PM

44. Welcome to DU!

Federal Way here!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bainbridge Bear (Reply #29)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 10:45 PM

54. Welcome to DU. am1090 listener from Tacoma here as well.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:46 PM

11. All of the Above.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:52 PM

12. who was running Bain when he was not running it

but still being paid as if he was running it?

Funny how he keeps leaving that easy little piece of information out. If it wasn't you, then give us the name of the person who WAS running it.

and why hasn't anyone in the MSM asked him that question instead of letting him leave it at "I left the company in 1999 to run the olympics"?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:59 PM

14. KnR

scum, he is!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 01:00 PM

15. I'd bet for the same reason he keeps the Bermuda company with a value of ~$10,500

And I'd bet that reason looks nothing like its face value.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HereSince1628 (Reply #15)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 01:56 PM

22. Some say

 

Some say he keeps that pitifully tiny company around because it is a front for the hookers, slaves, and drug business that supply repig big wigs 24x7.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bongbong (Reply #22)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 05:11 PM

42. I suspect it works much like a piece of copper tubing on a still

not worth much on it's own, but over the years a very profitable conduit for directing certain high yield products

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 01:23 PM

16. Why?

Because he doesn't want to go to prison.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Brewinblue (Reply #16)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 01:36 PM

18. Remember Leona Helmsley?

She said something to the effect, "I don't pay taxes, other people pay taxes."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to disndat (Reply #18)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 06:27 PM

45. "We don't pay taxes. Only the little people pay taxes." - Leona Helmsley aka inmate #15113-054

I found it in Wikiquotes. They cite the New York Times and Newsweek as their sources. Her Federal Bureau of Prisons number came from Wikipedia. (I loves the wikis.)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 01:47 PM

20. I can hear it now: "I am not a crook." n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rgbecker (Reply #20)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 04:38 PM

41. My first thought

Because he's a crook, that's why?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 01:59 PM

23. Eric Holder should arrest and frogmarch Romney's ass on NBCNews.com

That would ensure Obama's reelection, and perhaps start a slew of arrests of rethug millionaires and billionaires.

QUESTION: When would be the best time to actually arrest the bastard?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BanTheGOP (Reply #23)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 04:25 PM

40. Good question, even if it is hypothetical

We all know he will never be arrested, never be charged, and will live out his life with other criminals like Cheney and Rove in the lap of luxury.

But...IF some series of flukes occurred where some underling investigator, who wasn't in on the game, accidentally filed an irreversible charge and by some other fluke a rare journalist with integrity working for MSM let the cat out of the bag...

When to arrest him?
It would have to be a couple of days before the election. Hell, maybe even after, as I think Obama has it anyways. If the GOP had a couple of months or more they'd ride Jeb Bush or Chris Christie in on a white stallion. A lot of Freepers would be cheering like it was the second coming.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 02:01 PM

24. FB'd

Let's go viral, baby!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 02:01 PM

25. When he released

his returns to John McCain, John McCain went with Palin! There must be something really bad in there for him to choose that loon over Romney!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 02:02 PM

26. Why, Mittens, WHY? n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 02:16 PM

28. I hope Obama's team reads DU because I have something to say about this.

Mitt Romney received a HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION on his Utah home while he was running those Olympics and the fact was brought up when he was trying to claim he was a Massachusetts resident. Now, as we all know, you can only get one of those if you are a RESIDENT of a state (I pay a few hundred on a shack I have in rural Maine, that would only cost me fifteen bucks or so if I lived there instead of vacationed there).

There was an ENORMOUS stink made at the time--the whole "carpetbagger" and "bullshitter" and "out of state asshole" charges were flying around....and at the time, Mittsy wasn't sure if he was gonna run for governor of Utah or MA. If I recall, a court ruled on Mittsy's residency and they ruled in his favor--so he went out of his way to "prove" that he was a Massachusettsian. Why is he trying to pretend otherwise, now?

This is not a secret, but it is one of those things that is kind of buried in the mists of time. The Globe Spotlight people reported on it--it got a lot of play when it was revealed...to the point that Mittsy made public statements blaming unnamed accountants and he paid the full amount of taxes and maybe even a penalty fee.

I think that a review of public records with regard to Mittsy's residences might be revealing...but what this incident points out is that the guy will lie and flip-flop with sociopathic abandon, and he is one cheap asshole, that a man as wealthy as he is can't even cough up the lousy full freight for his property taxes.

I see the Globe is revisiting this, despite it getting scant attention, but it just shows that this guy will say ANYTHING to gain advantage: http://articles.boston.com/2012-07-13/opinion/32646257_1_tax-returns-mitt-romney-income-taxes


How Romney had filed his Massachusetts income taxes — as a resident or non-resident — during his years in Utah could have had some bearing on the issue. Since he had also been contemplating a run for office in Utah, some suspected he might have filed as resident there to establish more permanent roots in the Beehive State.

Romney initially refused to make a copy of his Massachusetts tax returns public, even a copy with the income information redacted. Suspicions only grew more intense after the Globe’s Frank Phillips reported that Romney had paid property taxes on his Park City, Utah, home as his primary residence for 1999, 2000, and 2001. Campaign aide Eric Fehrnstrom said that had happened because of a “clerical mistake” by the relevant county assessor’s office in Utah, an account that office pretty much backed up, though no one could say quite how the unusual error had occurred.

At the time of the property tax brouhaha, Romney told reporters he had filed his state income taxes “both as a resident of Utah and a resident of Massachusetts.” Pressed by Phillips, Fehrnstrom also insisted Romney had filed as a Massachusetts resident, adding that “you are just going to have to take my word for it.”

And how accurate were Romney and Fehrnstrom’s assertions? Well, though technically true, they stopped several fathoms short of being straightforward. We know that because, with state Democrats posed to push forward with a residency challenge, Romney suddenly reversed course. He called reporters to his campaign headquarters, where he acknowledged that he had initially filed his Massachusetts taxes as part-time resident for 1999 and a nonresident for 2000.


Once a liar, always a liar.

We could actually take a page from Dubya's book, here--Fool me once, won't git fooled agin!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MADem (Reply #28)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 02:38 PM

31. Here's the Barack Obama Campaign's Contact page:

(In case his team members don't read DU.)

http://www.barackobama.com/contact-us?source=footer-nav

K&R

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MADem (Reply #28)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 03:22 PM

34. What a cheap, cheesy putz.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MADem (Reply #28)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 03:35 PM

37. Tell our friends at MSNBC. All of them.

@maddowblog, @lawrence (only two I know).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MADem (Reply #28)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 03:38 PM

39. 1++++

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MADem (Reply #28)

Tue Jul 17, 2012, 10:44 AM

56. If this is not already an OP it should be!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 03:07 PM

32. What we would see is: A big fat circle of 0s and 1s that PRODUCE NOTHING but more 0s and 1s.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 03:33 PM

35. Romney may be performing an act of 'Noblesse oblige'.

Digging his own grave.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GeorgeGist (Reply #35)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 03:35 PM

38. Ah, but the "Corn King" ALWAYS returns. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 03:34 PM

36. K&R

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 05:19 PM

43. President Obama should offer Mitt a pardon for any misdeeds in L'Affaire Bain

And let's see if Mitt will accept it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 06:30 PM

46. What I find ironic:

I think it is HILARIOUS and a bit of justice that the right-wing's smear template against President Obama ala the birthers, is being used against the GOP's #1.

Don't take this as a criticism. While the birthers' efforts over the past 4 years have returned nothing but a few misquoted statements and some blatant forgery hoaxes, Romney Bain issue is bringing up pay dirt because the vetting of Romney is making the right-wingers desperate as they realize that they have been snookered by their corporate masters.

The chickens are coming home to roost, and they are pooping all over the heads of Romney supporters and not-so-supporters everywhere.

Lol.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 07:19 PM

47. Thom Hartmann quoted from this list today..

It was in the first hour of his show, and read it, and gave credit to Democratic Underground..
Yes..I heard it on the radio...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 08:13 PM

48. Thiis would make a good slideshow commercial.

A lot of people are trading pdfs and ppts.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 08:34 PM

49. He has something to hide.

That is the only reason why he is not releasing them.

McCain who saw his tax returns has yet to come to his defense.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 09:15 PM

50. MITTENS, YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE

truth, 'cause it ain't gonna set your lying ass free, oh no...but the truth, like cream will rise and be seen by all (I can hardly wait). Oh, when Bad things happen to Bad People...Should be rich.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to drynberg (Reply #50)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 09:17 PM

51. Has anything like this happened before?? I don't recall..someone knows..nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 09:29 PM

52. k&r nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread