Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

thomhartmann

(3,979 posts)
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 03:38 PM Jul 2012

Thom Hartmann: American Entrepreneurship has Declined 53% Since Reagan!



On Tuesday - in a rare-act of bipartisanship - the Senate passed the Small Business Jobs and Tax Relief Act. The legislation is aimed at giving some much-needed stimulus to America's entrepreneurs - by giving any small business that hired more workers in 2012 a 10% tax credit. It also gives away new tax credits for small businesses that invest in new major equipment. It's no secret that small businesses have taken quite a hit following the Bush Great Recession. But there's new evidence out now that suggests American entrepreneurial class has been suffering for a long time before Barack Obama - or even George W. Bush - moved into the White House. In fact - the evidence shows that American entrepreneurs have been getting pummeled for more than thirty years now. According to a new study released today by the New American Foundation, the number of entrepreneurs per capita has dropped by 53% since 1977. And since 1991, the number of Americans who are self-employed has dropped by more than 20%. In other words, Americans who use to be able to start their own businesses are increasingly being forced to join the ranks of the working poor. Our nation - quite frankly - has forgotten how to foster an entrepreneurial class over the last thirty years. So why is that?

Could it have something to do with massive tax cuts for the wealthy and for transnational corporations that have made rich even richer and big corporations even bigger to force small businesses out of the marketplace? Or maybe it's because we no longer enforce the Sherman Anti-Trust Act and have jumped head-first into so-called Free Trade either, which has given way to giant transnational corporations that small business upstarts simply can’t compete with. Not only that, we’ve destroyed the social safety net in the country, which used to give Americans a chance to take risks and try new jobs because they had a net of security to fall in if they failed. Today if they fail, they’re condemned to indefinite poverty - so no one can afford to take risks to start small businesses. So what's really behind the death of the entrepreneur class in America - and how do we revive it? Barry C. Lynn is the author of the new study on this topic by the New America Foundation, as well as the author of the brilliant book "Cornered: The New Monopoly Capitalism and the Economics of Destruction" and joins Thom.

The Big Picture with Thom Hartmann on RT TV & FSTV "live" 9pm and 11pm check www.thomhartmann.com/tv for local listings
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thom Hartmann: American Entrepreneurship has Declined 53% Since Reagan! (Original Post) thomhartmann Jul 2012 OP
It's very simple. Scootaloo Jul 2012 #1
And re: "Route 66": maddiemom Jul 2012 #2
The business of big business is to keep small business frm doing business. nineteen50 Jul 2012 #3
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
1. It's very simple.
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 04:19 PM
Jul 2012

Deregulation reduces competition.

- Deregulation of environmental standards, for instance, makes innovations in efficiency and clean production unprofitable. The market stagnates on old-but-profitable technology, at a cost to both the production market, and the commons.

- Financial and business practice deregulation allow the largest to grow even larger, crowding out our buying out current competition and preventing others from entering the field.

- Labor deregulation removes incentive for workers to remain with one employer for long, and suppresses the buying power of consumers as well. Both business and customer suffer from these effects. There is a similar disincentive for companies to compete for employees; it's simply a race to the bottom and prospective hires are told to settle for what they can get.

Regulation exists to keep markets as fair and efficient as possible, which means protecting employees, consumersm and competition. The republicans have flipped that on its head; their belief is that companies should be protected from competition and employees, and that the customer should settle for whatever's offered.

maddiemom

(5,106 posts)
2. And re: "Route 66":
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 04:38 PM
Jul 2012

Buz and Tod (sic) found work everywhere they stopped, paying their way in their jaunt across the country.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Thom Hartmann: American E...