Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Some thoughts upon Memorial Day: with Chris Hayes (Original Post) edcantor May 2012 OP
I heard about this segment from a local radio show alp227 May 2012 #1
Best warmonger chickenhawk line EVER 90-percent May 2012 #2
Exactly right: how do we separate the heros from the war criminal when we support the troops? marble falls May 2012 #3
Chris Hayes has issued a statement of apology edcantor May 2012 #4

alp227

(32,006 posts)
1. I heard about this segment from a local radio show
Mon May 28, 2012, 01:47 AM
May 2012

Stacy Taylor pointed out how Hayes said he didn't want to call fallen soldiers "heroes", and of course the right wing is screaming.

example http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2012/05/27/chris-hayes-im-uncomfortable-calling-fallen-military-heroes

marble falls

(57,014 posts)
3. Exactly right: how do we separate the heros from the war criminal when we support the troops?
Tue May 29, 2012, 08:17 AM
May 2012

If there had been a draft, Bush definitely would not have had a second term (or at least one he could have stolen) and Afghanistan and Iraq would have been over eight years ago.

 

edcantor

(325 posts)
4. Chris Hayes has issued a statement of apology
Tue May 29, 2012, 10:11 AM
May 2012
http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/chris-hayes-i-am-deeply-sorry

We're not really allowed to have an adult conversion about war because political adversaries are so eager to use our words to polarize and attack -- which is what happened to Chris Hayes yesterday when he discussed his discomfort with the word "hero" during his Memorial Day segment. He has since issued this statement:

On Sunday, in discussing the uses of the word "hero" to describe those members of the armed forces who have given their lives, I don't think I lived up to the standards of rigor, respect and empathy for those affected by the issues we discuss that I've set for myself. I am deeply sorry for that.

As many have rightly pointed out, it's very easy for me, a TV host, to opine about the people who fight our wars, having never dodged a bullet or guarded a post or walked a mile in their boots. Of course, that is true of the overwhelming majority of our nation's citizens as a whole. One of the points made during Sunday's show was just how removed most Americans are from the wars we fight, how small a percentage of our population is asked to shoulder the entire burden and how easy it becomes to never read the names of those who are wounded and fight and die, to not ask questions about the direction of our strategy in Afghanistan, and to assuage our own collective guilt about this disconnect with a pro-forma ritual that we observe briefly before returning to our barbecues.

But in seeking to discuss the civilian-military divide and the social distance between those who fight and those who don't, I ended up reinforcing it, conforming to a stereotype of a removed pundit whose views are not anchored in the very real and very wrenching experience of this long decade of war. And for that I am truly sorry.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Some thoughts upon Memori...