Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

votesparks

(1,288 posts)
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 04:52 PM Jul 2015

Why Clinton's Apology and Obama's Prison Drive-By, Token Clemencies Are Cynical Election Posturing

Listen here:

http://directory.libsyn.com/episode/index/show/blackagendareport/id/3680289

A Black Agenda Radio Commentary
by BAR managing editor Bruce A. Dixon

Six and a half years into his presidency, Barack Obama has discovered black mass incarceration. He's shocked, visits a federal prison and frees a token handful of prisoners. Fifteen years out of office, Bill Clinton half-apologies for his 1990s crime bills which nearly doubled the US prison population. What's got into these guys? It's election season. Hillary is running for the White House and she needs the black vote.

Why Bill Clinton's Apology and Barack Obama's Prison Drive-By, Token Clemencies Are Cynical Election Year Posturing

A Black Agenda Radio Commentary by BAR managing editor Bruce A. Dixon

Ten whole years ago, back in July 2005 when the Black Agenda Report crew was still at Black Commentator, I wrote that
“With under 5 percent of the world’s people, the US accounts for 25 percent of the planet’s prisoners. More than half its 2.2 million prisoners come from the one eighth of its population which is black. Today, an astounding 3 percent of all African Americans languish in prisons and jails, and nearly as many more are on probation, parole, bail, house arrest or court supervision... Right now, the shadow of prison squats at the corners of, and often at the center of nearly every black family’s life in this nation.”

Yesterday President Obama repeated some of these same figures, and they are pretty much the same. Total US prisoners are still 2.2 or 2.3 million, and a slight drop in the black incarceration rate makes us now a little less instead of a little more than half, but the overall picture is unchanged in a decade. The president then announced the release of forty-some nonviolent federal drug offenders out of a total of about 70,000, and stopped in at a federal prison Thursday. The same day, ex-president Bill Clinton offered a half-hearted “apology” for his 1990s crime bills, which he admitted “set the stage” for state and federal governments to nearly double the US prison population.

Why? Why did President Obama wait six and a half years into his presidency to say the basic damning numbers and free a token handful of drug war prisoners? And how come Bill Clinton, fifteen years out of office chose this week to publicly admit that black mass incarceration was maybe not the best public policy?

The short answer is that Hillary Clinton is running for president, and she needs that big black vote. Barack and Bill are working hard to position Hillary as the lesser evil, so that a large black vote, an essential component of what Democratic party consultants call their “base vote” can be mobilized for her.

We shouldn't forget however that despite the posturing of former presidents, that mass black incarceration has been the joint and bipartisan policy of both Republicans and Democrats.

The federal prison budget rose every year but one in the Clinton years, the Bush years, and so far the Obama years look about the same. The First Black President approved new federal supermax solitary prisons in places like Illinois, where citizen action closed the infamous Tamms penitentiary, and his Justice Department went to court to keep thousands who should have been freed when Congress relaxed the crack to powder sentence disparity from 100 to on to 17 to 1 behind the walls to this day.

Why? Why is black mass incarceration the bipartisan policy of America's rulers?

It's not about a continuation of slavery or to get free prison labor, that's silly. Nine out of ten prisoners do no work at all. And it's not because prisons are especially profitable. Apart from immigration prisons under Obama, privatization has never been big enough to drive the engine of mass incarceration at any time in the last 3 or 4 decades.

The America prison state came into fullest flower at the same time as and as the flip side of Bill and Hillary Clinton's so-called “welfare reform.” Whether Republicans or Democrats are in office black mass incarceration serves the vital purpose of morally justifying America's viciously unequal and racist economic and social order. The prison state does this by creating mostly black and brown class of permanently stigmatized and “unworthy” poor who can be portrayed as not deserving decent housing, real educations, affordable health care, dignity or jobs at living wages and whose precarious lives and devastated communities can be blamed on anything except the failure of neoliberal capitalism to provide bread, education, housing dignity or justice.

The more unjust and unequal capitalist America becomes, the more it needs prisons, and that stigmatized class defined by them. Their precarious lives are also a standing lesson to millions more with falling wages and rising debts to shut up and suck it up or this could be you.

We at Black Agenda Report have been talking about black mass incarceration for ten years now, longer than Michelle Alexander, and before anybody heard of the New Jim Crow. We're glad that presidents Bill and Barack have rediscovered it, even if only just in time to get another Democrat elected, which for them is about all that matters.

For Black Agenda Radio I'm Bruce Dixon. Find us on the web at www.blackagendareport.com.

Bruce A. Dixon is managing editor at Black Agenda Report, and serves on the state committee of the GA Green Party. Reach him at bruce.dixon(at)blackagendareport.com.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Clinton's Apology and Obama's Prison Drive-By, Token Clemencies Are Cynical Election Posturing (Original Post) votesparks Jul 2015 OP
K&R SamKnause Jul 2015 #1
It was so obvious that Obama and the Clintons planned there two snagglepuss Jul 2015 #2
President Obama should have granted clemency votesparks Jul 2015 #3
Isn't he limited to the number he can pardon? snagglepuss Jul 2015 #4
No. His pardons are unlimited if they meet constitutional requirements. ancianita Jul 2015 #5
Thanks for the clarification. Do you know if Don Siegelman snagglepuss Jul 2015 #7
I can't see why not, since he was tried in a federal court and sent to a federal prison. ancianita Jul 2015 #8
Thanks again. Have a good weekend. snagglepuss Jul 2015 #9
Bet he wishes he could've pardoned the 46,000 you speak of, but he's limited by constitutional law, ancianita Jul 2015 #6

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
2. It was so obvious that Obama and the Clintons planned there two
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 05:36 PM
Jul 2015

events to coincide and also obvious given the timing it was just crass politicking for Hillary's benefit. So crass I have to wonder whether any of their target audience is going to be wildly impressed.

votesparks

(1,288 posts)
3. President Obama should have granted clemency
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 06:41 PM
Jul 2015

to a number more like 46,000, not 46.

Then I would be convinced he's real.

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
4. Isn't he limited to the number he can pardon?
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 08:17 PM
Jul 2015

Apart from the fact it is just a measly 46 people, the fact this was coordinated with Bill and Hillary to benefit Hillary makes it a meaningless gesture.

ancianita

(36,017 posts)
8. I can't see why not, since he was tried in a federal court and sent to a federal prison.
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 11:15 PM
Jul 2015

It might have been under an Alabama law that he was indicted, but I'm no lawyer so I don't really know the constitutional support for such a pardon.

However, The New Yorker makes a case for him.

http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/obama-pardon-don-siegelman

ancianita

(36,017 posts)
6. Bet he wishes he could've pardoned the 46,000 you speak of, but he's limited by constitutional law,
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 10:21 PM
Jul 2015

which says presidential pardons only apply to federal criminal acts against the United States.

So, the President can't pardon a person for violating any federal civil laws or state criminal or civil laws. For example, if a person committed a victimless crime in any state, say, smoking pot, s/he can't be pardoned. So that right there explains the thousands not pardoned.

Cynical campaign ploys or not, that seems to be the crux of the president's pardon problem.

Apparently he can grant absolute, conditional or partial pardons.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Why Clinton's Apology and...