HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Video & Multimedia (Forum) » Perv Gets Caught Filming ...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 07:10 AM

Perv Gets Caught Filming 17 Year Old's Private Parts

21 replies, 2827 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 21 replies Author Time Post
Reply Perv Gets Caught Filming 17 Year Old's Private Parts (Original post)
Jamaal510 Dec 2013 OP
SaltyBro Dec 2013 #1
brucefan Dec 2013 #2
SaltyBro Dec 2013 #16
Xipe Totec Dec 2013 #3
Drahthaardogs Dec 2013 #5
Katashi_itto Dec 2013 #12
Iggo Dec 2013 #4
maindawg Dec 2013 #6
WhoIsNumberNone Dec 2013 #7
RitchieRich Dec 2013 #8
RedstDem Dec 2013 #9
Demo_Chris Dec 2013 #10
RC Dec 2013 #11
jberryhill Dec 2013 #20
RC Dec 2013 #21
Savannahmann Dec 2013 #13
Atman Dec 2013 #14
jberryhill Dec 2013 #18
Plucketeer Dec 2013 #15
jberryhill Dec 2013 #17
Kingofalldems Dec 2013 #19

Response to Jamaal510 (Original post)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 07:42 AM

1. The guy who filmed this is openly gay

Joey Boots came out years ago. Still kinda pervy but it is also pervy to have a girl performing like that in a place like Times Square.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SaltyBro (Reply #1)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 08:00 AM

2. Is he a Howard Stern

Whack packer?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brucefan (Reply #2)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 01:46 PM

16. Yes

He came out on the show.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SaltyBro (Reply #1)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 08:24 AM

3. The crotch vigilantes guarding her pudenda don't come out looking like heros either

Self appointed guardians.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SaltyBro (Reply #1)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 08:54 AM

5. Why was she wearing Daisy Dukes and doing the splits standing on her head?

I was not thinking "pervy" I was thinking "What the hell is this girl doing?"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drahthaardogs (Reply #5)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 11:02 AM

12. In Time's Square

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jamaal510 (Original post)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 08:32 AM

4. You shoulda seen how she was dressed, Your Honor!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jamaal510 (Original post)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 09:09 AM

6. no laws were broken

What is the crime here?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jamaal510 (Original post)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 09:21 AM

7. It's pretty clear what he's filming, so guilty on that count-

He even gets a quick shot of the PA's ass.

I don't necessarily fault him on the 17 thing though. I mean, it's not like she's 10- she looks grown. 17 year olds who will be legal in another couple of months don't come with a warning sign.

None of that mitigates the first count though- And he's a total asshole about it when the crotch vigilantes catch him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jamaal510 (Original post)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 09:40 AM

8. wtf is this video doing on this site?

Don't get me wrong, it's hot and all, just confused.
I'm just not used to getting soft porn with my "news."

Pretty damn creepy to film it, but there are no two ways about it being a public spectacle. Acting surprised and offended is laughable.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jamaal510 (Original post)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 10:00 AM

9. hard to pick out the biggest dumbass in this one

there's so many to choose from!!

lol

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jamaal510 (Original post)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 10:13 AM

10. Pro model and photoshoot (note the reflectors)...

 

It is undoubtedly creepy (or at least impolite) to focus your camera on the girl's crotch, but it hardly seems fair to bring up the model's age.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jamaal510 (Original post)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 10:32 AM

11. Unless I missed it, I didn't see any private parts.

 

And I think I would have noticed. The girl is adequately dressed for being in public. No private parts were exposed.
But people see what they want to see.
What I saw was a photography crew photographing a person in various poses in public. BTY, at least some of the crew I saw were women.
Also, how do we know the girl was 17? Who says, beside whoever posted of the video?
What the girl was doing was a standard ballerina pose.
Should we boycott Ballets as being too risque for family entertainment too?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RC (Reply #11)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 02:54 PM

20. Much of her ankles and all of her elbows were fully exposed!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #20)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 04:32 PM

21. Oh noes!!1!11!!

 

I missed that looking for her chest to fall out.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jamaal510 (Original post)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 11:14 AM

13. Just think the FBI was probably watching her get undressed that night on her Webcam

Thank God they're not perverts, just defending the nation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jamaal510 (Original post)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 11:35 AM

14. One of the dumbest things I've ever seen.

No indication of the woman's age. And she clearly knows her shorts are "riding up," as she is repeatedly adjusting her crotch. AND there is a actually a crowd of people in folding chairs watching the photo shoot (which I agree appeared to be professional, given the crew, although I'm not sure what they were shooting. Promo shot? Album cover?

Either way, the bike guy and the old woman had no business telling the Goober Guy what he can shoot in Times Square. Anyone who has been there knows it is a circus, and most of these people actually have someone else in the crowd passing around a hat, or at least are taking tips. Funny thing is, despite the commotion, it doesn't seem to stop her from "performing," knowing people are taking pictures of her.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Atman (Reply #14)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 01:49 PM

18. They can "tell" him whatever they want

They can't forcibly prevent him.

They can stand in front of him.

My bet is the photo crew did not have a permit for commercial photography in the first place, as required in the City of New York.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jamaal510 (Original post)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 12:41 PM

15. No laws broken

And as much as I HATE to admit it, I'm the kinda guy that would take a second look at that gal's "performance" and not feel guilty about it. I would be outraged at someone "upskirting" or video shooting some one who obviously thought they were in a private setting, but this young lady (and her crew) are delusional to think that everyone's gonna walk through Times Square with blinders on.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Plucketeer (Reply #15)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 01:47 PM

17. Potentially two laws broken


1. If the photo shoot was being conducted for commercial purposes, then the crew needed a permit from the City of New York. There may be some other issues in relation to labor laws and the hiring and payment of the model.

2. If the biker guy grabbed the videographer's camera, that is a form of assault.

In general, the video guy is correct that he can point his camera where he wants to point it in public. The other people are correct that they can stand in the line of view of the video guy. They are all entitled to exchange words and insults.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jamaal510 (Original post)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 02:41 PM

19. That's Joey Boots.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread