HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Video & Multimedia (Forum) » Pic of the Moment: Crazy ...

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 12:49 PM

Pic of the Moment: Crazy Sh*t Conservatives Say Inside the Fox News Bubble



Conservatives: Expanding Plan B Access Will Embolden Rapists And Sexual Predators

67 replies, 6452 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 67 replies Author Time Post
Reply Pic of the Moment: Crazy Sh*t Conservatives Say Inside the Fox News Bubble (Original post)
Skinner Jun 2013 OP
Just Saying Jun 2013 #1
Skittles Jun 2013 #15
Just Saying Jun 2013 #16
whopis01 Jun 2013 #24
BlueJazz Jun 2013 #39
Skittles Jun 2013 #41
BlueJazz Jun 2013 #43
AlbertCat Jun 2013 #64
Skittles Jun 2013 #65
OhioChick Jun 2013 #66
Skittles Jun 2013 #67
mimi85 Jun 2013 #18
Just Saying Jun 2013 #21
niyad Jun 2013 #61
titanicdave Jun 2013 #2
Cirque du So-What Jun 2013 #3
freshwest Jun 2013 #54
L0oniX Jun 2013 #4
Gidney N Cloyd Jun 2013 #5
phantom power Jun 2013 #6
Dawson Leery Jun 2013 #7
Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2013 #8
pacalo Jun 2013 #9
Half-Century Man Jun 2013 #10
ThomThom Jun 2013 #11
Stonepounder Jun 2013 #12
Ilsa Jun 2013 #20
Stonepounder Jun 2013 #32
Ilsa Jun 2013 #33
Stonepounder Jun 2013 #34
Ilsa Jun 2013 #35
tclambert Jun 2013 #38
Maraya1969 Jun 2013 #28
kimmylavin Jun 2013 #13
Divine Discontent Jun 2013 #47
Initech Jun 2013 #14
tclambert Jun 2013 #37
Initech Jun 2013 #40
awoke_in_2003 Jun 2013 #48
leftyohiolib Jun 2013 #17
ctsnowman Jun 2013 #19
RedSpartan Jun 2013 #22
SammyWinstonJack Jun 2013 #23
SunSeeker Jun 2013 #25
Just Saying Jun 2013 #26
closeupready Jun 2013 #27
sevenseas Jun 2013 #29
Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2013 #30
DCKit Jun 2013 #31
LineReply .
blkmusclmachine Jun 2013 #36
DissidentVoice Jun 2013 #42
randr Jun 2013 #44
alp227 Jun 2013 #45
Nanjing to Seoul Jun 2013 #46
KansDem Jun 2013 #49
AsahinaKimi Jun 2013 #50
Nanjing to Seoul Jun 2013 #60
DCKit Jun 2013 #51
The Wizard Jun 2013 #52
BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2013 #53
stevenleser Jun 2013 #55
Jamaal510 Jun 2013 #56
Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2013 #57
Hulk Jun 2013 #58
tavalon Jun 2013 #59
Sunlei Jun 2013 #62
WovenGems Jun 2013 #63

Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 12:53 PM

1. Seriously?

I don't like to use the "c" word but she qualifies.

How about it helping those young girls you horrid twit?! Or is it God's will a child carry her rapist's child?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Just Saying (Reply #1)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 02:56 PM

15. for the record

the "c" word is NEVER appropriate

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skittles (Reply #15)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 02:58 PM

16. Sorry to offend.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skittles (Reply #15)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 03:43 PM

24. crazy? We can't even call people crazy now? n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skittles (Reply #15)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 05:24 PM

39. ???

On Edit: Damn I've got to get out more...I just figure what word the C word was...geez.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueJazz (Reply #39)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 06:02 PM

41. I WILL KICK NAIVE BLUEJAZZ ASS

YES INDEED

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skittles (Reply #41)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 06:21 PM

43. Shoot, I should kick my own ass. A physics degree and I can't think of "that" word ? On the...

...other hand, it gives E=MC squared a whole new meaning.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skittles (Reply #15)

Thu Jun 13, 2013, 11:50 AM

64. the "c" word is NEVER appropriate

Nonsense.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AlbertCat (Reply #64)

Thu Jun 13, 2013, 04:39 PM

65. go ahead

tell us exactly when it is appropriate

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AlbertCat (Reply #64)

Thu Jun 13, 2013, 08:16 PM

66. When exactly is it appropriate?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OhioChick (Reply #66)

Fri Jun 14, 2013, 03:47 PM

67. aw check it out, OC

he never answered; perhaps he thinks we are a couple of c***ts

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Just Saying (Reply #1)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 03:04 PM

18. Ed Shultz

got suspended for calling her a slut. She may not be a slut, but she's def batshit crazy!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mimi85 (Reply #18)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 03:24 PM

21. I think we can all agree with that! n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Just Saying (Reply #1)

Thu Jun 13, 2013, 09:57 AM

61. yes, exactly--it is god's will. sickening, isn't it? their deity certainly is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 12:53 PM

2. More Stupidity

from fox and fools.......but then it is as Jon Stewart dubbed it, Bullshit Mountain Network so what else can we expect?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 12:54 PM

3. Oy!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cirque du So-What (Reply #3)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 11:06 PM

54. Laura explains the sexual preferences of conservatives.



Please, get away from us. You're disgusting!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 01:03 PM

4. The cult of batshit continues.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 01:28 PM

5. Because pedophiles and rapists care about outcomes, Laura? Is that it?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 01:29 PM

6. wait, because the rapists and pedophiles have been holding back up til now...

because of the concern about impregnating their victims?

WTF??

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 01:40 PM

7. Says the ignorant follower

of the Opus Dei satanist/romanist cult.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 01:43 PM

8. I thought gunny sacks were good for that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 02:01 PM

9. Ban the morning-after pill because it only helps PEDOPHILES!1! And RAPISTS!1!

And every other spine-tingling term for sex deviants she can think of to scare Fixed News' dumber-than-rocks viewers into disregarding the victims' standpoint.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 02:21 PM

10. A pill to help pedophiiles and rapists...

She might be on to something.

If each pill contained a tiny piece of her soul, that should be toxic enough to dispose of pedophilies and rapists.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 02:33 PM

11. does she even know what a pedophile is?

and how many of their victims get pregnant?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 02:34 PM

12. I guess that I am really missing something here.

This is not snark. I really do not understand. Currently, anyone, male or female, at any age, can walk into any drug or convenience store in the country (not to mention a number of public restrooms) and buy condoms. Condoms are primarily designed to prevent the sperm from reaching a fertile egg, thus preventing pregnancy. (Yes, I know that they also serve the purpose of preventing the transmission of STDs, but that's not why they were invented.)

The so-called morning after pill does exactly the same thing - it prevents the sperm from reaching a fertile egg, thus preventing pregnancy. So why is there such an uproar over females taking responsibility for preventing their own pregnancy, when it seems to be perfectly OK for a male to take responsibility for getting a female pregnant? Why aren't they screaming that being able to buy rubbers is a good deal for pedophiles and statutory rapists.

And just for snark, could Laura explain to me how someone could commit statutory rape against an old woman, as opposed to a young girl?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stonepounder (Reply #12)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 03:14 PM

20. An elderly woman who is

Non compos mentis due to illness or developmental disability could be statutorily raped. She might say yes to her perpetrator who knows she has no legal capacity. Happens with caregivers.

Are you saying the burden of preventing pregnancy via daily birth control should be on the woman because she should fear being raped, any time, any day? What if she's been traumatized and doesn't remember to get the money for contraception?

What if she is a young woman in college, not in a relationship because she's on scholarship and shes devoting her energies to finishing, not dating? Is she supposed to be on birth control in case she gets raped?

Do lesbians need to be on the pill because they can expect to be raped and impregnated?

Is every little girl who has gone through menarche supposed to be on the pill or expected to buy contraception!

Have you ever taken care of a rape victim? Do you know the myriad possibilities of how traumatized they can be?

This isn't snark; please explain yourself.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ilsa (Reply #20)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 04:22 PM

32. Wow! Did you ever miss the point of my post.

1. In common law, 'statutory rape' is almost invariably used to mean an older man engaging in sex with a female who is past puberty but still younger than the 'age of consent'. I was simply commenting that 'statutory rape' is normally used in conjunction with 'young' women, so the comment about 'statutorily raping young girls' seemed to be somewhat redundant and was wondering why the speaker needed to qualify her comment that way.

2. My basic comment had absolutely nothing to do with rape. It had to do with the frenzy about the 'morning after' pill being sold over the counter to anyone. The morning after pill is a method of contraception for women, and the conservatives seem to be going bananas over it. I was simply questioning why it is OK for anyone to buy condoms, which are a male form of birth control, but somehow it is not OK for women to buy birth control. Granted, condoms are used 'before' and the morning after pill is used 'after', but the end result is the same, conception is prevented. It doesn't have to be rape. It can be completely consensual, but 'unprotected' sex, with a morning after realization of OMG. That was the point that I didn't understand. I would suspect that the vast majority of women who would avail themselves of the morning after pill would fall into the OMG category, not the 'I've just been raped' category.

I hope that clarifies what I was trying to say. Sorry if it was misunderstood.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stonepounder (Reply #32)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 04:46 PM

33. Sorry about the misunderstanding...

I thought you were placing the onus of post-rape birth control on the victim, obviously. I've known rape victims who were so traumatized, they lost half their vocabulary, had difficulty concentrating on driving, etc.

To answer your question: it boils down to this idea that conservatives have that women shouldn't be allowed control over their reproduction, so they define "life" as the moment of conception. They would do away with birth control pills that prevent conception if they could. They have a pre-Griswold vs Connecticutt view of contraception.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ilsa (Reply #33)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 04:56 PM

34. And therein lies the issue I was raising.

I don't understand them getting to up in arms against women using birth control, while not having any problem with men using condoms. They seek to regulate all forms of female contraception - the pill, diaphrams, IUDs, etc. need a prescription from a doctor. Now comes the morning after pill that is most assuredly NOT an abortifact, and can be bought OTC, and the Right goes bat-shit crazy.

The only conclusion I can come to is that they want to put women back into second-class status - entities who cannot make decisions for themselves and are totally dependent on men for what they can and cannot do (The Handmaiden's Tale anyone?). But if that is what they really want, how in the world do they get female spokespeople to espouse this this POV?

That's the part where I really get lost.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stonepounder (Reply #34)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 05:04 PM

35. I can't imagine why any woman would want to deny

Other women choices for their own lives. If they don't want to use OC, fine, but don't force that loss of choice on other women.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stonepounder (Reply #34)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 05:11 PM

38. I thought they also opposed condoms. Abstinence is the only acceptable contraceptive.

Many parents can tell you how well THAT works.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Stonepounder (Reply #12)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 04:08 PM

28. You see if you were a real Fox news enthusiast you would never take that short leap and realize

that if rapists and pedophiles gave a shit about whether or not their victims became pregnant they would use a condom. But they don't give a shit so they don't use condoms. And they would not shove a morning after pill down their victim's throats because they still would still not give a shit.

(Unless they are related or the victim is in their life for any other reason)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 02:51 PM

13. I don't even understand the "logic" here.

So a man assaults a girl, and then forces her to take two pills sometime over the next 72 hours?
I just... I don't get what the hell she is saying.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kimmylavin (Reply #13)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 08:59 PM

47. "I don't even understand the "logic" here."

That's their goal, my friend. They want to cause confusion in their audience, and derail the goal being sought by bringing up the most bizarre asinine tangents that really don't make any freakin' sense.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 02:54 PM

14. WTF is wrong with Fox? Do they put stupid pills in the water or something?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Reply #14)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 05:09 PM

37. Stupid pills have always been legal.

Fox "News" is a video substitute for those who have trouble taking the pill form.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tclambert (Reply #37)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 05:40 PM

40. Maybe they take the "Forget Me Now's" from Arrested Development.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Reply #14)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 09:06 PM

48. No, it comes naturally. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 03:03 PM

17. i thought she was talking about enlisting in the military

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 03:05 PM

19. K & R

Maybe all DUers can agree on this?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 03:28 PM

22. I can't believe someone smart enough to clerk for the Supreme Court would say something so stupid.

Oh, wait. I take that back. She clerked for Justice Thomas.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 03:40 PM

23. How does that make any sense....AT ALL?



repukes are wierd people.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 03:51 PM

25. So forcing a child to give birth to her rapist's baby is better?!

Apparently, her reasoning is the by aborting the fetus, you are destroying evidence against the rapist/pedophile. Not really, you dumbshit. You still have the fetus, that can be tested just like a live baby can, and without ruining the girl's life.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 03:54 PM

26. I think the problem is we're looking for these people to make sense.

And they just don't.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 04:06 PM

27. What a stupid woman.

Honey, you are making NO SENSE.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 04:13 PM

29. Simply just Fox's brainwashing technique of word association ...

Put "morning after pill" in the same sentence as "pedophiles" and "rapists", and VOILA! "morning after pill" morphs into a negative thought....for their brainwashed, super-righteous, non-thinking viewers, that is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 04:15 PM

30. It's a good deal for non sequiturs, too!

You were saying, Laura?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 04:18 PM

31. She's got my vote! nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 05:07 PM

36. .

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 06:18 PM

42. And someone expected ration and reason from Laura Ingraham?

She's like Michelle Malkin...the so-called "pretty face" of batshit talk radio.

Underneath, both of them have the same evil core as any other far-right wingnut.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 06:25 PM

44. Laura and Faux taking the side of the "victims" once again

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 06:50 PM

45. K&R+yay my thread made the front page again! N/T

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 08:53 PM

46. Really, Laura? Really? THIS is the BEST you can do? Seriously?

 

BTW, love the cross you're wearing. WWJL? When would Jesus Lie? WWJD? Who would Jesus Discriminate?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 09:48 PM

49. Man, I wish I got paid what she gets paid for saying crazy bullshit!

I mean, I can say crazy bullshit now without getting paid, so a 6- or 7-digit salary with all the benis would be sweet icing on the cake!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 09:52 PM

50. Fox really is the HATE CHANNEL....

They come up with the most vile People in the country and allow them to broadcast their message to the ignorant masses.

chikushou! Omee tada no baka-mono da! Damare!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AsahinaKimi (Reply #50)

Thu Jun 13, 2013, 12:33 AM

60. agreed. ta ma de sha bi, hun dan he biao zi zai na ge pian le dian shi

 

wo xi wang dou ren min zai na ge gou shi hui zhi li kai he qu si!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 10:27 PM

51. Had no idea. Anyone else feeling a bit rapey right now? nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 10:34 PM

52. Somewhere there's a

lightening bolt looking for Laura Ingrham.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 10:40 PM

53. Laura just cobbles together a few HORRIFYING BUZZWORDS.

She knows that fuxtards won't think about anything she says. The name of the game is, grab those amygdalas, and SQUEEEEEZE.

Making sense, considering real life girls and women and thinking about what happens to them when help is or is not available, was NEVER a part of Miss Diamond-Encrusted-Cross-Holier-Than-Thou lady's train of "logic"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 11:08 PM

55. Hall of shame-worthy

Yes indeed

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 11:14 PM

56. OK, it's official.

Laura Ingraham isn't just a paid liar; she is a certified troglodyte. Anybody who links contraceptives with pedophilia must have something seriously wrong with them up there. You don't see Republicans like Steve Schmidt or Michael Steele coming out with stuff this misguided. Never.
Ingraham is in a whole different league.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 11:54 PM

57. THe Fox dumb blondes

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Thu Jun 13, 2013, 12:05 AM

58. Just happens to be a dumb "female blond"

Is NO reflection on female blonds, or male blonds, or blonds; but this hag is wasted material. I can't stand to see this hypocritical biotch squall like she has anything that anyone but an evangelical bible-thumper would be the least bit interested in hearing.

She is one empty-headed fox-nonsense shill. Nothing more. Don't blame blonds for this woman's ignorance...please.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Thu Jun 13, 2013, 12:28 AM

59. Is Laura Ingraham really human

I thought she was maybe second gen cyborg. She certainly lacks what most would call a soul and certainly lacks anything resembling gray matter between those ears and her bleached hair.

Is she nipping at the heels of that other one Ann Coultergeist?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Thu Jun 13, 2013, 10:23 AM

62. yeah fox and all the palins of the world who allow their kids to overnight at drunk parties..

can shove a pill down their daughters mouths when they come home with a hangover.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Original post)

Thu Jun 13, 2013, 11:30 AM

63. Stoned

Smoke a joint and watch FoxNews then it isn't insulting to your intelligence it's funnier than 5 year olds playing soccer.

I am not promoting drug use but I do think FoxNews is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread