Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,450 posts)
Sun Jul 6, 2014, 12:45 PM Jul 2014

Gitmo detainees' lawyers invoke Hobby Lobby decision in court filing

Gitmo detainees' lawyers invoke Hobby Lobby decision in court filing

Attorneys say clients have religious rights afforded by same law cited by SCOTUS in controversial Hobby Lobby ruling

July 5, 2014 3:42PM ET

by Philip J. Victor - @philjvic

Lawyers for two Guantanamo Bay detainees have filed motions asking a U.S. court to block officials from preventing the inmates from taking part in communal prayers during the Islamic holy month of Ramadan. The lawyers argue that – in light of the Supreme Court’s recent Hobby Lobby decision – the detainees’ rights are protected under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).

The motions were filed this week with the Washington D.C. district court on behalf of Emad Hassan of Yemen and Ahmed Rabbani of Pakistan. U.K.-based human rights group Reprieve said both men asked for the intervention after military officials at the prison "prevented them from praying communally during Ramadan."

During Ramadan, a month of prayer and reflection that began last weekend, Muslims are required to fast every day from sunrise to sunset. But what is at issue in this case is the ability to perform extra prayers, called tarawih, "in which [Muslims] recite one-thirtieth of the Quran in consecutive segments throughout the month."

U.S. Army Lt. Col. Myles B. Caggins III, a spokesman for the Department of Defense, told Al Jazeera on Friday that the "Defense Department is aware of the filing," and that the "government will respond through the legal system."

The detainees' lawyers said courts have previously concluded that Guantanamo detainees do not have "religious free exercise rights" because they are not “persons within the scope of the RFRA.”

More:
http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/7/5/hobby-lobby-guantanamo.html

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gitmo detainees' lawyers invoke Hobby Lobby decision in court filing (Original Post) Judi Lynn Jul 2014 OP
Silly prisoners ... GeorgeGist Jul 2014 #1
And its a good thing their not corporations. Think of the fine mess.......... wandy Jul 2014 #2

wandy

(3,539 posts)
2. And its a good thing their not corporations. Think of the fine mess..........
Sun Jul 6, 2014, 01:58 PM
Jul 2014

our good christan supreme court would find themselves in if they had to recognize that other religions had rights.
Oh, I can hear the yammering about farmers founding christan nations at the very thought of it.

Coming right out and saying "they ain't corporate people" may not be the best way to sell this.

With any luck or for want of better weasel words they will get off by saying prisoners don't have rights.
That should work out just fine.
Right?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Gitmo detainees' lawyers ...