Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 11:34 AM Jun 2014

Mining Twitter gold, at five bucks a pop

Not to brag or anything, but I probably have more Twitter followers than you.

I wish I could say I earned them all with my erudite tweets. The truth is, I purchased many of them.

A couple of months ago I ran an experiment to see how easy it would be to up my online profile. As a data scientist, I was intrigued by the notion that not all followers are earned: There is a lively Internet business in selling followers — specially created fake accounts on Twitter or other social networking sites that were set up by enterprising businesspeople specifically to bump up follower numbers for people willing to pay.

I was curious to see what I could measure from this process. Would purchasing followers prove to be totally worthless? Or would having more acolytes — even fake ones — actually affect my life online?

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-0601-lotan-buying-followers-20140601-story.html#navtype=outfit

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mining Twitter gold, at five bucks a pop (Original Post) bemildred Jun 2014 OP
Interesting, especially the bing results. antiquie Jun 2014 #1
Pretty much what I would expect. bemildred Jun 2014 #2

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
2. Pretty much what I would expect.
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 05:11 PM
Jun 2014

User rating systems only work well when the profit motive is removed. Even then it's tricky.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Mining Twitter gold, at f...