TV as Birth Control: Defusing the Population Bomb
Earlier this year Stanford human geographer Martin Lewis asked his students a simple question: How did they think U.S. family sizes compared with those in India? Between Indian and American women, who had the most children? It was, they replied, a no-brainer. Of course Indian women had morethey estimated twice as many. Lewis tried the question out on his academic colleagues. They thought much the same.
But its not true. Indian women have more kids, it is true, but only marginally so: an average of 2.5 compared to 2.1. Within a generation, Indian women have halved the number of children they bear, and the numbers keep falling.
Its not that the population problem has gone away in Indiayet. India has a lot of young women of childbearing age. Even if they have only two or three children each, that will still continue to push up the population, already over a billion, for a while yet. India will probably overtake China to become the worlds most populous nation before 2030.
But India is defusing its population bomb. A fertility rate of 2.5 is only a smidgen above the long-term replacement level, whichallowing for girls who dont reach adulthood and some alarming rates of aborting female fetusesis around 2.3. The end is in sight.
Read more: http://www.utne.com/community/population-bomb-zm0z14uzwil.aspx#ixzz31dOssFGr
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)The Stranger
(11,297 posts)Finally, some glimmer of good news for the dying planet.
I never thought I would be in favor of the idiot box, but here goes.
"More T.V. for everyone!"
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)From "You bet your life" IIRC. Something like
Groucho: Do you have any kids?
Woman contestant: Yes, 4 - aged 5, 4, 2, and 1
Groucho: What happened to 3?
Woman: Oh, we got a TV that year