Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
U.S. uses ‘diplospeak’ to evade tough truths on Ukraine, other crises -McClatchey DC
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/04/09/223866/us-uses-diplospeak-to-evade-tough.htmlExcerpt:
The U.S. brand of diplomatic doublespeak has come under scrutiny recently because revelations by anti-secrecy groups and high-profile leakers have shown the world how the United States spies and eavesdrops on even its close partners and uses highly unflattering language to describe allies, as well as foes, in in-house reports and on telephone calls.
The WikiLeaks revelations have thrown some diplospeak statements into sharp relief when they have allowed comparison between diplomats classified communications to Washington with what they have said in public. But those who listen carefully to the public utterances of diplomats can usually interpret what is intended behind the words, former Ambassador William Rugh, a 30-year Foreign Service officer who served in six Arab countries, wrote in an essay about the use of U.S. diplomatic language in reference to the Arab Spring uprisings of recent years.
The most notorious diplospeak case of those transitions involved the Egyptian militarys ouster last summer of the countrys first democratically elected president. U.S. officials took such pains to avoid calling it a coup that Comedy Centrals The Daily Show called it going Kama Sutra on the English language, bending words into all kinds of exciting, exotic positions before reaching a climax of meaninglessness.
Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/04/09/223866/us-uses-diplospeak-to-evade-tough.html#storylink=cpy
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 584 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. uses ‘diplospeak’ to evade tough truths on Ukraine, other crises -McClatchey DC (Original Post)
go west young man
Apr 2014
OP
ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)1. This is a complaint?
Other than the ham-fisted attack on Democratic administrations this article makes (it only mentions Clinton and Obama, not Bush), this article says more or less absolutely nothing that isn't well known about diplomats - i.e. they're diplomatic.
A diplomat is a person who can tell you to go to hell in such a manner as you look forward to the trip
-Caskie Stinnett
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
Benton D Struckcheon
(2,347 posts)2. So is spying, even though the first spymaster we ever had was GW.
Nathan Hale was a villain, I guess.
ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)3. It's the law of double-standards...
Many people take joy from being outraged. So what do you do when the current President (Obama) is simply not outrageous, especially compared to his predecessor?
Invent fake outrage, of course. Call normal things that have gone on forever "outrageous".
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community