Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
Mon Oct 14, 2013, 11:37 AM Oct 2013

Divestment Campaign against fossil fuels growing fast, says study

It's tough to pepper spray, arrest, do a media blackout on a strategy like this.

Investors aren't just listening to the bobbleheads on network news. We can actually do a lot to influence this by persuading our retirement funds to divest from companies working against our interests, especially if you belong a public employees retirement system.

For teachers, this is exactly the approach we need to take the wind out of the sails of the corporate education reformers, and we need to start before it's too late.


Campaign against fossil fuels growing, says study
Investors being persuaded to take their money out of fossil fuel sector, according to University of Oxford study

Damian Carrington
The Guardian, Monday 7 October 2013

A campaign to persuade investors to take their money out of the fossil fuel sector is growing faster than any previous divestment campaign and could cause significant damage to coal, oil and gas companies, according to a study from the University of Oxford.

The report compares the current fossil fuel divestment campaign, which has attracted 41 institutions since 2010, with those against tobacco, apartheid in South Africa, armaments, gambling and pornography. It concludes that the direct financial impact of such campaigns on share prices or the ability to raise funds is small but the reputational damage can still have major financial consequences.

"Stigmatisation poses a far-reaching threat to fossil fuel companies – any direct impacts of divestment pale in comparison," said Ben Caldecott, a research fellow at the University of Oxford's Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, and an author of the report. "In every case we reviewed, divestment campaigns were successful in lobbying for restrictive legislation."

The report is part of a new research programme on stranded assets backed by Aviva Investors, HSBC, Standard & Poor's and others. It found: "The fossil fuel campaign has achieved a lot in the relatively short time since its inception."

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/oct/08/campaign-against-fossil-fuel-growing
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
1. Well, of course profit is more important than the Earth, any old day.
Mon Oct 14, 2013, 11:50 AM
Oct 2013

So - the only way to get change is to go for the money.
Fukushima looms worse and worse, and some are still advocating cute little "neighborhood reactors".
Fuck them.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
3. I always thought that the Money People would only go for green energy if they could
Mon Oct 14, 2013, 03:25 PM
Oct 2013

block the sun and the wind and restrict access to the oceans.
Looks like the way they will continue to make the same profit on electricity is to charge more and more for access to the grid.
Hopefully battery storage will continue to improve so that access to the grid is not needed as much.
Wonder what excuse companies like Duke will use in order to keep collecting non-refundable money for nuke plants that will never be built.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Divestment Campaign again...