Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Why Europe Can’t Just “Fix” Youth Unemployment
By Jérôme E. Roos
Source: Roarmag.org
Wednesday, May 15, 2013
In recent weeks, European leaders somewhat belatedly seem to have become mightily interested in the issue. Italys new Prime Minister Enrico Letta called youth unemployment the most serious problem facing his country and called for an EU plan to combat it. German Chancellor Angela Merkel, flag-bearer of the European austerity movement, similarly considers youth unemployment to be Europes biggest challenge. Meanwhile, a new campaign by Big Think somewhat naively asks whats causing youth unemployment and what can fix it?
The real reason European leaders are suddenly so concerned about youth unemployment while they remain unmoved by the plight of Greek AIDS patients, for instance, who now cant get their anti-retroviral drugs is simply that they are terrified by the prospect of social unrest. As the New York Times reported today, it is clear that policy makers are seriously worried that millions of frustrated young job seekers pose as much of a threat to the euro zone as excessive government debt or weak banks. German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble literally admitted that We will have to speed up in fighting youth unemployment, because otherwise we will lose the support, in a democratic way, in some populations of the European Union. What they fear, in other words, is a continent-wide youth uprising. At its worst, their plans to fix youth unemployment serve to distract us from the obvious class dimension at play, promoting the illusion that the social crisis we face is just a series of economic problems that can be fixed without radical changes to the political status quo.
The inconvenient truth is that unemployment is an integral element of the neoliberal policy response to the crisis pursued by the European Union and the IMF. This, in itself, is nothing new. IMF austerity programs in the developing world have long involved dramatic reductions in wages and rises in unemployment. Careful quantitative analysis of the Latin American debt crisis of the 1980s has shown that the most consistent and statistically significant impact of Fund programs in Latin America was the reduction in labor share of income. Even official IMF studies recognize that its austerity programs boost unemployment and lower paychecks. Most importantly, the authors of a 2011 IMF report, Painful Medicine, conclude that austerity causes not just short-term but particularly long-term unemployment.
In other words, asking for austerity measures without youth unemployment is like insisting on the medieval practice of blood-letting without the blood-loss. It is not only brutal, but also practically impossible. Austerity and unemployment are like Siamese twins, conjoined at the hip, designed to strengthen and reinforce one another. As long as the EU and IMF keep imposing these highly destructive adjustment measures, unemployment will keep on rising. The only genuine solution to unemployment, therefore, would be to break free from the shackles of austerity and to default on the foreign debt. This is the reformist vision pursued by SYRIZA in Greece, and despite the lack of revolutionary imagination of this quasi-Keynesian approach, there is certainly something to be said for it from a humanitarian point of view.
The inconvenient truth is that unemployment is an integral element of the neoliberal policy response to the crisis pursued by the European Union and the IMF. This, in itself, is nothing new. IMF austerity programs in the developing world have long involved dramatic reductions in wages and rises in unemployment. Careful quantitative analysis of the Latin American debt crisis of the 1980s has shown that the most consistent and statistically significant impact of Fund programs in Latin America was the reduction in labor share of income. Even official IMF studies recognize that its austerity programs boost unemployment and lower paychecks. Most importantly, the authors of a 2011 IMF report, Painful Medicine, conclude that austerity causes not just short-term but particularly long-term unemployment.
In other words, asking for austerity measures without youth unemployment is like insisting on the medieval practice of blood-letting without the blood-loss. It is not only brutal, but also practically impossible. Austerity and unemployment are like Siamese twins, conjoined at the hip, designed to strengthen and reinforce one another. As long as the EU and IMF keep imposing these highly destructive adjustment measures, unemployment will keep on rising. The only genuine solution to unemployment, therefore, would be to break free from the shackles of austerity and to default on the foreign debt. This is the reformist vision pursued by SYRIZA in Greece, and despite the lack of revolutionary imagination of this quasi-Keynesian approach, there is certainly something to be said for it from a humanitarian point of view.
Full Article: http://www.zcommunications.org/why-europe-can-t-just-fix-youth-unemployment-by-j-r-me-e-roos
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1386 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Europe Can’t Just “Fix” Youth Unemployment (Original Post)
polly7
May 2013
OP
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)1. I would doubt that it is by intent.
The fact remains that with high youth unemployment tax receipts are less. The issue is how to increase jobs in the private sector as opposed to artificially inflating the public sector which is how Greece came unstuck bigtime.