HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Good Reads (Forum) » Historic Case to Challeng...

Sat Feb 16, 2013, 10:16 PM

Historic Case to Challenge BBC’s 9/11 Coverage

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by pinto (a host of the Good Reads forum).

On February 25, in the small town of Horsham in the United Kingdom, there will be a rare and potentially groundbreaking opportunity for the 9/11 truth movement. Three hours of detailed 9/11 evidence is to be presented and considered in a court of law where the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) will be challenged over the inaccurate and biased manner in which it has portrayed the events and evidence of 9/11.

Over the last 16 months, BBC has been challenged strongly by individuals in the UK over two documentaries that they showed in September 2011 as part of the tenth anniversary of 9/11, namely ‘9/11: Conspiracy Road Trip’ and ‘The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 Ten Years On’. Formal complaints were lodged with BBC over the inaccuracy and bias of these documentaries, which, according to 9/11 activists, was in breach of the operating requirements of BBC through their ‘Royal Charter and Agreement’ with the British public. This document requires BBC to show information that is both accurate and impartial. These complaints were supported by the US-based educational charity Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth), which submitted detailed scientific evidence to BBC to buttress the complaints. The evidence focuses in particular on the confirmed free-fall of WTC 7 and NIST's 2008 admission of this fact...

... Section 15 of the UK Terrorism Act 2000, Article 3, states that it is offence to provide funds if there is a reasonable cause to suspect that those funds may be used for the purposes of terrorism. Tony’s claim is that BBC has withheld scientific evidence which demonstrates that the official version of the events of 9/11 is not possible and that BBC has actively attempted to discredit those people attempting to bring this evidence to the public. According to Rooke, by doing this, BBC is supporting a cover-up of the true events of 9/11 and is therefore potentially supporting those terrorist elements who were involved in certain aspects of 9/11 who have not yet been identified and held to account...

/... http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/711-historic-case-to-challenge-bbcs-911-coverage.html#continue

I thought this was worth noting.

4 replies, 1207 views

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 4 replies Author Time Post
Reply Historic Case to Challenge BBC’s 9/11 Coverage (Original post)
Ghost Dog Feb 2013 OP
chervilant Feb 2013 #1
ReRe Feb 2013 #2
LineNew Reply ^
Wilms Feb 2013 #3
pinto Feb 2013 #4

Response to Ghost Dog (Original post)

Sat Feb 16, 2013, 10:26 PM

1. Definitely!

I have challenged dozens of people (including engineers and scientists) to explain how WTC7 collapsed into its own footprint HOURS after the Towers collapsed. Not one single person can explain WTC7 and most of these dialogues devolve into "you're just one of those conspiracy theorists!"

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ghost Dog (Original post)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 01:30 AM

2. Thanks Ghost Dog...

will have to wait till tomorrow to read it though.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ghost Dog (Original post)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 08:21 AM

3. ^

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ghost Dog (Original post)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 01:47 PM

4. 911 truth topics are best posted in the Creative Speculation forum. Thanks.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink