HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Good Reads (Forum) » LAPD in the cross hairs (...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 12:34 AM

LAPD in the cross hairs (LAT Editorial)

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-dorner-lapd-20130214,0,3334374.story

Editorial
LAPD in the cross hairs
Christopher Dorner may be dead, but the police response to the crisis raises troubling questions.
February 14, 2013

The manhunt for Christopher Dorner in one sense ended successfully: Assuming that the body recovered from the burnt-out home in Big Bear is his, Dorner's rampage is over, and he won't harm anyone again. Yet it's hard to cheer an episode that left four people dead and that featured police officers firing wildly on innocent civilians in their determination to eradicate a man who had threatened them.

It's understandable that police would be enraged by Dorner. He openly declared war on all law enforcement officers and embarked on a killing spree specifically aimed at his former colleagues. But how does that justify the actions of the officers who shot into a truck driven by two newspaper carriers, Maggie Carranza and Emma Hernandez? Carranza is a 47-year-old Latina who was driving a blue Toyota with Hernandez, her 71-year-old mother; officers somehow mistook those two women for a burly African American man driving a gray Nissan. And, in their zeal or under the impression that any force would be tolerated in these circumstances, officers fired away, hitting Hernandez twice in the back. Both women lived, testament to the poor aim, not the good judgment, of the officers.

To be clear: Their actions would be worrisome even if Dorner had been behind the wheel of that truck. Force, including lethal force, is a necessary part of police work, but it may be used only to protect officers or others from harm. It is to be wielded to ensure safety, not to exact vengeance. While it is especially offensive to have that force used against innocent people, it's even improper to use it in this fashion against the guilty.

The Los Angeles Police Department has committed itself to reviewing Dorner's dismissal and the allegations he made in his loopy online manifesto. That's fine, though the results of that inquiry seem fairly obvious: It would shock any fair-minded observer of today's LAPD to discover that academy recruits were, as Dorner claimed, breaking into verses of songs of the Hitler Youth. Still, self-reflection is valuable and should offer a reminder that while racism is no longer openly practiced at the LAPD, eliminating even its vestiges should remain a priority for an institution once afflicted by it.

2 replies, 878 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 2 replies Author Time Post
Reply LAPD in the cross hairs (LAT Editorial) (Original post)
jsr Feb 2013 OP
defacto7 Feb 2013 #1
cui bono Feb 2013 #2

Response to jsr (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 12:59 AM

1. K&R and retweeted

This is the best conclusion that can be made after such a fiasco.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jsr (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 04:20 AM

2. KnR

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread