HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Good Reads (Forum) » Chris Hedges: The NDAA an...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Mon Feb 11, 2013, 08:38 AM

Chris Hedges: The NDAA and the Death of the Democratic State


from truthdig:


The NDAA and the Death of the Democratic State

Posted on Feb 11, 2013
By Chris Hedges


On Wednesday a few hundred activists crowded into the courtroom of the Second Circuit, the spillover room with its faulty audio feed and dearth of chairs, and Foley Square outside the Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse in Manhattan where many huddled in the cold. The fate of the nation, we understood, could be decided by the three judges who will rule on our lawsuit against President Barack Obama for signing into law Section 1021(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).

The section permits the military to detain anyone, including U.S. citizens, who “substantially support”—an undefined legal term—al-Qaida, the Taliban or “associated forces,” again a term that is legally undefined. Those detained can be imprisoned indefinitely by the military and denied due process until “the end of hostilities.” In an age of permanent war this is probably a lifetime. Anyone detained under the NDAA can be sent, according to Section (c)(4), to any “foreign country or entity.” This is, in essence, extraordinary rendition of U.S. citizens. It empowers the government to ship detainees to the jails of some of the most repressive regimes on earth.

Section 1021(b)(2) was declared invalid in September after our first trial, in the Southern District Court of New York. The Obama administration appealed the Southern District Court ruling. The appeal was heard Wednesday in the Second Circuit Court with Judges Raymond J. Lohier, Lewis A. Kaplan and Amalya L. Kearse presiding. The judges might not make a decision until the spring when the Supreme Court rules in Clapper v. Amnesty International USA, another case in which I am a plaintiff. The Supreme Court case challenges the government’s use of electronic surveillance. If we are successful in the Clapper case, it will strengthen all the plaintiffs’ standing in Hedges v. Obama. The Supreme Court, if it rules against the government, will affirm that we as plaintiffs have a reasonable fear of being detained.

If we lose in Hedges v. Obama—and it seems certain that no matter the outcome of the appeal this case will reach the Supreme Court—electoral politics and our rights as citizens will be as empty as those of Nero’s Rome. If we lose, the power of the military to detain citizens, strip them of due process and hold them indefinitely in military prisons will become a terrifying reality. Democrat or Republican. Occupy activist or libertarian. Socialist or tea party stalwart. It does not matter. This is not a partisan fight. Once the state seizes this unchecked power, it will inevitably create a secret, lawless world of indiscriminate violence, terror and gulags. I lived under several military dictatorships during the two decades I was a foreign correspondent. I know the beast. ....................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_ndaa_and_the_death_of_the_democratic_state_20130211/



1 replies, 629 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 1 replies Author Time Post
Reply Chris Hedges: The NDAA and the Death of the Democratic State (Original post)
marmar Feb 2013 OP
Doctor_J Feb 2013 #1

Response to marmar (Original post)

Mon Feb 11, 2013, 09:05 AM

1. I've been reading on DU that Obama needs NDAA to keep us safe

and that he will never abuse or misuse or overuse this new power.

Can someone tell me when we (the Dem Party) turned into a bunch of Cheney's?



Edit: I do see one glimmer of hope. If the appeals court is all wingers, their partisan nature may overcome their fascist tendencies - i. e. they may strike it down just because Obama is the defendant. But, when it comes up again for a Repuke president...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread