HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Good Reads (Forum) » The Nature of John Boehne...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Fri Dec 21, 2012, 07:32 PM

The Nature of John Boehner's Problem

So last night, John Boehner suffered a particularly humiliating defeat. Attempting to pass "Plan B," a fiscal plan that would go nowhere in the Senate, and even if it did it would get vetoed by the President, Boehner was hoping that if nothing else he'd be able to say in the face of rising criticism, "We passed a plan!" But he couldn't accomplish even that; realizing that he couldn't muster the votes within his caucus for Plan B, he cancelled the vote. Boehner is the weakest Speaker in memory. I picture Nancy Pelosi, who can corral more votes before her morning coffee than Boehner can in a week of begging, smiling a wicked little smile at her opposite number's bumbling failure.

.......

Ideological extremism is a multi-layered thing. It's substantive, in the content of the policy views these Members hold. It also has to do with their personal political calculations—most of them come from safe Republican districts, where the only threat they'll ever get is a primary challenge from the right, so they don't need to worry that there will be a consequence for recalcitrance. But it's more than just extremism; I think it also has to do with the particular kind of politician who now dominates the House Republican caucus.

The Republicans who got elected in the last two cycles—and there are more than enough of them to scuttle anything Boehner wants to pass—don't have particularly long views, and they don't care much about legislating. They came to Washington to say "No!" to things. They aren't sophisticated about policy, and they didn't spend years working their way up by navigating tricky political situations in state houses. They're bomb throwers, and they got elected by being the most angrily conservative person in whatever district they were running in. The idea of making the best of a bad situation, or voting yes on one bill you don't like as part of a strategy to set the stage to win a partial victory on another bill you won't like, makes no sense to them. They don't particularly care about the usual carrots that party leaders can dangle before junior members, like plum committee assignments or future opportunities for home-district pork. They don't really care whether John Boehner keeps his job. They see themselves as lone wolves, fighting for a cause whose eventual victory won't come through the boring work of legislation, but through being strong and resolute, and fighting government and Democrats at every step. This obviously doesn't apply to all of the House GOP caucus, or maybe even most. But there are enough of them to whom the description applies, enough to make Boehner's life miserable.

So it isn't enough to say they're ideological extremists. You can be highly ideological but still have a strategic sense and a desire to take incremental steps toward your ultimate goals. Ted Kennedy was extremely liberal, but he shepherded more legislation through the Senate than nearly anyone in American history, and most of those laws involved compromises. That's because he saw legislating as the way to accomplish his ideological goals. Today's House Republicans don't. If Boehner comes to them and says, "Here's the best three-part strategy to minimize the damage from the situation we're in," they just don't want to hear it. I'll repeat a question I asked in yesterday's "Ringside Seat" (sign up for our newsletters, by the way!): If you were John Boehner, would you even want this job anymore?

http://prospect.org/article/nature-john-boehners-problem

5 replies, 1099 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 5 replies Author Time Post
Reply The Nature of John Boehner's Problem (Original post)
Redfairen Dec 2012 OP
elleng Dec 2012 #1
DJ13 Dec 2012 #2
LeftofObama Dec 2012 #3
silhouete2 Dec 2012 #4
cbrer Dec 2012 #5

Response to Redfairen (Original post)

Fri Dec 21, 2012, 07:37 PM

1. Boner's problem:

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to elleng (Reply #1)

Fri Dec 21, 2012, 07:52 PM

2. His problem is a short prick?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Redfairen (Original post)

Fri Dec 21, 2012, 08:01 PM

3. I thought this was the nature of his problem...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LeftofObama (Reply #3)

Fri Dec 21, 2012, 08:17 PM

4. Yes, well

that, too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Redfairen (Original post)

Sat Dec 22, 2012, 11:43 PM

5. Headupassitis nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread