Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Protecting nuclear plants from nature’s worst
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/protecting-nuclear-plants-from-natures-worst/2012/10/31/5af389ac-2374-11e2-8448-81b1ce7d6978_story.html
Protecting nuclear plants from natures worst
By Phillip Lipscy, Kenji Kushida and Trevor Incerti, Published: October 31 | Updated: Thursday, November 1, 5:00 AM
Phillip Lipscy is an assistant professor of political science and a fellow at the Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center at Stanford University. Kenji Kushida is a research associate in Japanese studies at the Shorenstein Center, where Trevor Incerti is a researcher.
As superstorm Sandy bore down on the East Coast, three nuclear power plants were shut down and an alert was issued for the Oyster Creek plant in New Jersey. This is an important reminder that the United States has several low-lying nuclear plants on the Eastern seaboard, with minimal protection against inundation. Particularly with climate change increasing the likelihood of extreme weather, this hidden threat to public safety should be remedied.
The disaster at Japans Fukushima Daiichi plant on March 11, 2011, revealed how much damage a tsunami can inflict on a nuclear power facility. To assess the vulnerability of such plants around the world, we collected information on plant height, sea wall height and the location of emergency power generators for 89 nuclear plants that lie next to water. We compared this to historical information on high waves triggered by various sources such as earthquakes, landslides and hurricanes.
Our findings were striking.
<snip>
This uncertainty means we should do much more to protect U.S. nuclear power plants against potential threats. The Fukushima task force recommendations, which said that operators should reevaluate their preparations, are a good starting point but do not go far enough. More sea walls should be constructed, and existing walls should be raised to minimize the danger of inundation. Back-up power generators should be located well above sea level and within watertight structures. Waterproofing should be inspected regularly and aggressively. Risk assessments should be conducted by independent observers. With so many nuclear plants perilously close to major population centers, reasonable precautions should not await the next disaster.
Protecting nuclear plants from natures worst
By Phillip Lipscy, Kenji Kushida and Trevor Incerti, Published: October 31 | Updated: Thursday, November 1, 5:00 AM
Phillip Lipscy is an assistant professor of political science and a fellow at the Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center at Stanford University. Kenji Kushida is a research associate in Japanese studies at the Shorenstein Center, where Trevor Incerti is a researcher.
As superstorm Sandy bore down on the East Coast, three nuclear power plants were shut down and an alert was issued for the Oyster Creek plant in New Jersey. This is an important reminder that the United States has several low-lying nuclear plants on the Eastern seaboard, with minimal protection against inundation. Particularly with climate change increasing the likelihood of extreme weather, this hidden threat to public safety should be remedied.
The disaster at Japans Fukushima Daiichi plant on March 11, 2011, revealed how much damage a tsunami can inflict on a nuclear power facility. To assess the vulnerability of such plants around the world, we collected information on plant height, sea wall height and the location of emergency power generators for 89 nuclear plants that lie next to water. We compared this to historical information on high waves triggered by various sources such as earthquakes, landslides and hurricanes.
Our findings were striking.
<snip>
This uncertainty means we should do much more to protect U.S. nuclear power plants against potential threats. The Fukushima task force recommendations, which said that operators should reevaluate their preparations, are a good starting point but do not go far enough. More sea walls should be constructed, and existing walls should be raised to minimize the danger of inundation. Back-up power generators should be located well above sea level and within watertight structures. Waterproofing should be inspected regularly and aggressively. Risk assessments should be conducted by independent observers. With so many nuclear plants perilously close to major population centers, reasonable precautions should not await the next disaster.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 1232 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Protecting nuclear plants from nature’s worst (Original Post)
bananas
Nov 2012
OP
More on the NJ natural gas delivery system and nuclear power plants in Oyster Creek and Salem.
proverbialwisdom
Nov 2012
#1
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)1. More on the NJ natural gas delivery system and nuclear power plants in Oyster Creek and Salem.
From today's reading:
http://enenews.com/gas-fires-still-burning-10-miles-from-nj-nuclear-plant-official-the-devastation-is-nothing-that-could-be-seen-from-the-air-it-is-beyond-imagination
http://enenews.com/report-wave-took-out-5-of-6-critical-pumps-that-cool-reactor-at-njs-salem-nuclear-plant-still-operating-on-emergency-cooling-systems-unit-was-at-100-power
http://enenews.com/nrc-spent-fuel-pool-cooling-lost-njs-oyster-creek-nuclear-plant-during-hurricane-sandy