Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,077 posts)
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 10:05 AM Oct 2012

Experts: Attacking Iran Would Open Global "Pandora's Box"


Published on Monday, October 22, 2012 by LobeLog.com
Oil, Geo-Political Experts Say Attacking Iran Poses Huge Risks

by Jim Lobe


As a bastion of foreign-policy realism, the Center for the National Interest (CNI), formerly the Nixon Center, is known around Washington for hosting very lively discussions among experts, and Friday’s session, entitled “War With Iran: Economic and Military Considerations”, was particularly engaging, and virtually unanimous — and almost unanimously scary — in its conclusions.

The three presenters were Adm. Mark Fitzgerald, who served as deputy commander of U.S. Naval Forces, Central Command and commander of U.S. Naval Forces Europe, among many other posts; Geoffrey Kemp, a CNI fellow who served as a Gulf expert on Reagan’s National Security Council; and J. Robinson West, the chairman and founder of PFC Energy who has also held senior positions in the White House, the Energy Department, and the Pentagon under various Republican administrations. Kemp, it should be noted, is working on a major study, due to be released in January, on the issue that was under discussion.

Of the three, West’s assessment was particularly grim. He asserted that Iran, with its arsenal of ballistic and shorter-range missiles and the Revolutionary Guards’ (IRGC) elite Qods Force, could without much difficulty take more than eight million barrels of oil a day off the market — specifically 5 million barrels from Saudi Aramco’s Abqaiq facility and the pipelines that run to the Ras Tannurah terminal on the Gulf just across from Iran (the missiles, he said, may not be too accurate, but “something is going to hit something); another 2.5 million barrels that run through southern Iraq where “the Iranians have a lot of agents” who could presumably wreak havoc on the pipelines; and as much as another one million more barrels that are pumped from the Caspian Sea to Ceyhan, Turkey, on the Mediterranean. (“If Iranians have agents on the ground, these pipelines are very vulnerable,” he said.)

“You could lose eight million barrels a day of production, and it would not come back quickly,” according to West. “We believe the price of oil will go above $200 a barrel,” he said. (Brent crude is currently selling at about $112/barrel.) Moreover, he added, that conclusion does not take account of any Iranian effort to block the Strait of Hormuz (an eventuality which, he said, he believed the US Navy could clean up quite quickly) or the possibility that Tehran may also use its missiles to strike the huge LNG facilities in Qatar. If they did, “the lights go out in South Korea and Japan,” he said. ..................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/10/22



3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Experts: Attacking Iran Would Open Global "Pandora's Box" (Original Post) marmar Oct 2012 OP
Did they say anything about the risks of going down in the history books as mass murderers? kenny blankenship Oct 2012 #1
Several Years Ago, Sir The Magistrate Oct 2012 #2
This article from August is packed with horrifying prospects... AntiFascist Oct 2012 #3

kenny blankenship

(15,689 posts)
1. Did they say anything about the risks of going down in the history books as mass murderers?
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 10:58 AM
Oct 2012
Utterly unrepentant mass murderers? Having turned away from our course of slaughter and mayhem in Vietnam, Central America, Iraq, Afghanistan-Pakistan, and a list of elsewheres too long to recount, by not even an inch?

The Magistrate

(95,247 posts)
2. Several Years Ago, Sir
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 11:00 AM
Oct 2012

Mr. Brzezinski stated flatly attacking Iran would be the end of U.S. global dominance, being for us what invading Afghanistan was for the USSR....

AntiFascist

(12,792 posts)
3. This article from August is packed with horrifying prospects...
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 08:15 PM
Oct 2012

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/07/30/253459/attack-on-iran-can-presage-world-war/

...

Pakistan, with a significant nuclear arsenal, which includes large numbers of tactical nukes not public “counted,” would likely either supply nuclear weapons to Iran, said by WikiLeaks to have financed Pakistan’s nuclear program, or to destroy Israel’s major population centers itself.

India, the ally Israel has “banked” on to offset this possibility, now stands between two budding nuclear superpowers, Pakistan and China, and would be forced to stand down.

This would force nuclear intervention by the US which would immediately bring about a massive nuclear response by China and trigger a strike on the US by Russia if a secret protocol exists and such an endeavor would serve Russia’s interests.

Reports indicate that protocol does exist and such an endeavor, whatever Russia’s relations with Israel may have been, would serve Russia’s interests, in fact, her survival.

...
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Experts: Attacking Iran W...