China Is Wary of U.S. Candidates' Tough Talk
Richer and more assertive since the last American presidential campaign, China is looking at the harsh anti-Chinese sentiment being expressed by both candidates with a mixture of aloofness and unease.
The Chinese say they are accustomed to China-bashing during the American election season, but there is growing concern among government officials, business executives and academics here that this time the attitude toward China among the American public and politicians is so hot it may not cool after Election Day.
From accusations of unfair trade practices to a discussion of whether it is proper for the candidates to have investments in Chinese companies, the word China came up 22 times, and always negatively, in the debate between President Obama and Mitt Romney last week. In the final presidential debate Monday night, when foreign policy will be the main subject, China is likely to be a center of attention again.
The relationship between China and the United States has become more brittle in the past two years, with differences over trade and strategic interests stoking American fears that China is infringing on the United States longstanding influence in Asia. For their part, the Chinese watch with growing alarm as their country has become a frequent target of blame for the weakness in the American job market.
full: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/21/world/asia/china-looks-on-warily-amid-us-candidates-tough-talk.html?pagewanted=all
The article includes a photo of a shop in Beijing. Notice who's on a shirt:
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Post removed
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)I wonder how much those shirts cost in that shop.
I wonder how much a tee-shirt costs in terms of the average wage of a worker in China.
And while we are at it, how many hours or parts of an hour does a Chinese worker have to work to earn enough to buy a kilo of rice or a kilo of chicken.
Those comparisons are meaningful. Currency comparisons are not.
Franker65
(299 posts)I find the behaviour of the candidates very interesting indeed - it might be better if one of them was honest and admitted investment in China is absolutely essential for the United States - look at statistics regarding American direct investment in China. Acknowledging the need for closer cooperation with the Chinese might be better for everyone. Disparaging them won't do anybody any favours.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Jimmy's the only one I can think of, and that was in the midst of a full-scale political insurgency.