Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

midnight

(26,624 posts)
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 10:48 AM Jun 2012

With New Burden on Unions, Court Tips the Balance Toward Corporations


by John Nichols
The most politically partisan—and politically activist—Supreme Court in modern American history has already assumed that, when it comes to electioneering, corporations have pretty much the same rights as human beings. Indeed, the High Court’s Citizens United ruling has given corporations unprecedented flexibility to act on their own behalf to influence election campaigns and results.

Yet, the same Court has now said that groups of actual human beings—trade unions that have organized public-sector workers—must sacrifice their flexibility in order to meet standards never before demanded of labor organizations.

Do we detect a pattern here?

Of course.

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/06/22-0
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
With New Burden on Unions, Court Tips the Balance Toward Corporations (Original Post) midnight Jun 2012 OP
Why doesn't he mention it was a 7-2 decision? TBMASE Jun 2012 #1
 

TBMASE

(769 posts)
1. Why doesn't he mention it was a 7-2 decision?
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 10:58 AM
Jun 2012

Ginsburg and Sotomayer sided with the majority. Surely they aren't pawns of corporations.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»With New Burden on Unions...