Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Robert Scheer: On to the Next ‘Bubble Fantasy’
from truthdig:
On to the Next Bubble Fantasy
Posted on Dec 22, 2011
By Robert Scheer
Few journalists have greater influence on U.S. foreign policy, particularly regarding the Middle East, than New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman. But his tortured obit of a column this week on the official end of the neocolonialist disaster that has been the Iraq occupation reminds one that the three-time Pulitzer Prize winner often gets it wrong.
Was the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, which he did so much to encourage, a wise choice? Friedman hides behind one of his trademark ambiguities: My answer is twofold: No and Maybe, sort of, well see. I say no because whatever happens in Iraq, even if it becomes Switzerland, we overpaid for it.
Aside from the stunning amorality of assessing the cost of war from the standpoint of the royal we, Friedman seems wildly optimistic about what the invasion has wrought. On a day when Iraqs prime minister, a Shiite, demanded that the leader of the Kurds arrest the Sunni vice president, Friedman celebrated the unity of the three groups as the most important product of the Iraq war. He blamed the failure of the U.S. occupation to accomplish more, in roughly equal measure, on the incompetence of George W. Bushs team in prosecuting the war, Iran, the Arab dictators and, most of all, Al Qaeda, which he seems surprised to report did not want a democracy in the heart of the Arab world.
President Bushs argument for the invasion was not based on democratic nation-building but rather on two specific lies that Friedman has long danced around: that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction that threatened U.S. security and that it was somehow linked to the 9/11 attacks. Friedman now insists Iraq was always a war of choice. As I never bought the argument that Saddam had nukes that had to be taken out, the decision to go to war stemmed for me from a different choice: Could we ... tilt it and the region onto a democratizing track? ...............(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/on_to_the_next_bubble_fantasy_20111222/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1132 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Robert Scheer: On to the Next ‘Bubble Fantasy’ (Original Post)
marmar
Dec 2011
OP
Laelth
(32,017 posts)1. Nice piece by Scheer. k&r n/t
-Laelth
kenny blankenship
(15,689 posts)2. Today 14 separate bombings in Baghdad killed about 70 Shiites.
I'd say it's not too soon to declare the post US withdrawal from Iraq "honeymoon" to be over
Tom Friedman is just as full of shit as he always has been.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)4. Today's events were so disturbing. The nation
That never caused us any harm, that was not part of the hijack efforts of Nine Eleven, has had nearly one million people killed, another four to five million in exile, and continued bloodshed.
For what? All so our top conglomerates have yet another country to shill their crap products to.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)3. What can one expect from the inventor of the Friedman Unit(tm).
Friedman Unit == "About another 6 months", the expected time until all will see how right we have been all along.