Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Income Inequality Is Real, It's Global, and It's Worst in the U.S. (Matthew O'Brien)
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/03/income-inequality-is-real-its-global-and-its-worst-in-the-us/254248/I know this sounds like blasphemy, but is it possible that America isn't an exceptional nation? Allan Meltzer makes the case that we are not and never have been -- at least when it comes to income inequality. Here's his chart from the Wall Street Journal showing trends in the income share of the top 1% for a handful of developed countries over the past century.
Let's begin with the left of the graph. As you can see, the incomes of the 1% move (roughly) in tandem across national boundaries. Blaming factors like globalization and new technologies for rising inequality may not be sexy, but that doesn't make them any less true. To the chagrin of Newt Gingrich, there's nothing particularly exceptional about America here.
But as your focus moves to right past 1980, the top 1% in Anglophone countries like the United States, Great Britain and Canada began pulling away from their European peers. And America pulled away from everybody else. Something more than just globalization is going on here.
That something is in large part government policy. A common mistake people make when they think about the government's role in inequality is to focus solely on tax rates. Skyrocketing inequality in the United States coincided with an era of tax-cutting for the rich, so intuitively it seems obvious that the mania for slashing top marginal rates was responsible for the rise of the 1%. Intuitive, but wrong. It's actually been a massive increase in pre-tax incomes for the 1% that has driven soaring inequality, not decreasing redistribution. Which brings us to the Reagan-Thatcher model of deregulated -- or in the case of derivatives, unregulated -- markets. It's this laissez-faire approach to financial markets and corporate boardrooms that explains why our rich have made off like bandits.
. . . more
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 2349 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Income Inequality Is Real, It's Global, and It's Worst in the U.S. (Matthew O'Brien) (Original Post)
swag
Mar 2012
OP
Skinner
(63,645 posts)1. It is striking how the curve starts to bend back up right around 1980.
What might have happened then?
swag
(26,485 posts)2. Oh, I seem to remember something.
Something that gave me the blues for 8 or 12 years or so.
Seems to be a gift that keeps on giving, to the very wealthy at least.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)3. We gots trickled on.
midnight
(26,624 posts)4. One in five American children now living in poverty according to new report Read more:
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2027013/Child-poverty-1-5-American-children-living-poverty.html#ixzz1oqOMNdP4
Govt. Policy demands the creation of jobs.
midnight
(26,624 posts)5. Aren't tax cuts just entitlements for the rich?