Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

swag

(26,485 posts)
Fri Mar 9, 2012, 05:39 PM Mar 2012

Income Inequality Is Real, It's Global, and It's Worst in the U.S. (Matthew O'Brien)

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/03/income-inequality-is-real-its-global-and-its-worst-in-the-us/254248/

I know this sounds like blasphemy, but is it possible that America isn't an exceptional nation? Allan Meltzer makes the case that we are not and never have been -- at least when it comes to income inequality. Here's his chart from the Wall Street Journal showing trends in the income share of the top 1% for a handful of developed countries over the past century.



Let's begin with the left of the graph. As you can see, the incomes of the 1% move (roughly) in tandem across national boundaries. Blaming factors like globalization and new technologies for rising inequality may not be sexy, but that doesn't make them any less true. To the chagrin of Newt Gingrich, there's nothing particularly exceptional about America here.

But as your focus moves to right past 1980, the top 1% in Anglophone countries like the United States, Great Britain and Canada began pulling away from their European peers. And America pulled away from everybody else. Something more than just globalization is going on here.

That something is in large part government policy. A common mistake people make when they think about the government's role in inequality is to focus solely on tax rates. Skyrocketing inequality in the United States coincided with an era of tax-cutting for the rich, so intuitively it seems obvious that the mania for slashing top marginal rates was responsible for the rise of the 1%. Intuitive, but wrong. It's actually been a massive increase in pre-tax incomes for the 1% that has driven soaring inequality, not decreasing redistribution. Which brings us to the Reagan-Thatcher model of deregulated -- or in the case of derivatives, unregulated -- markets. It's this laissez-faire approach to financial markets and corporate boardrooms that explains why our rich have made off like bandits.

. . . more
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Income Inequality Is Real, It's Global, and It's Worst in the U.S. (Matthew O'Brien) (Original Post) swag Mar 2012 OP
It is striking how the curve starts to bend back up right around 1980. Skinner Mar 2012 #1
Oh, I seem to remember something. swag Mar 2012 #2
We gots trickled on. Odin2005 Mar 2012 #3
One in five American children now living in poverty according to new report Read more: midnight Mar 2012 #4
Aren't tax cuts just entitlements for the rich? midnight Mar 2012 #5

Skinner

(63,645 posts)
1. It is striking how the curve starts to bend back up right around 1980.
Fri Mar 9, 2012, 10:23 PM
Mar 2012

What might have happened then?

swag

(26,485 posts)
2. Oh, I seem to remember something.
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 11:43 AM
Mar 2012

Something that gave me the blues for 8 or 12 years or so.

Seems to be a gift that keeps on giving, to the very wealthy at least.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Income Inequality Is Real...