Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 03:04 PM Feb 2016

Superfoods or superfrauds? Scientists are unimpressed

http://www.smh.com.au/technology/sci-tech/superfoods-or-superfrauds-scientists-are-unimpressed-20140703-zsv87.html

"New superfoods seem to be discovered with increasing frequency but rather like Superman they tend to be a fantasy construct. The label seems to attach itself to any foodstuff that is rich in a particular nutrient. Goji berries, an original superfood, have a lot of vitamin C, while the quinoa seed contains all nine essential amino acids.

...

With this elevation in status often come wildly exaggerated claims that blockbuster nutrients will stave off ageing or prevent some as-yet-incurable disease like cancer. Who needs superpowers when you can eat superfoods?

While the description is widely used in blogs and the media, it has no status in science - you’ll struggle to find it referenced in a peer-reviewed journal.

"It’s just a marketing tool used by people to push a certain food," says Dr Paul Roach, a University of Newcastle biochemist.

..."



-------------------------------------------------------------





1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Superfoods or superfrauds? Scientists are unimpressed (Original Post) HuckleB Feb 2016 OP
. HuckleB Feb 2016 #1
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Superfoods or superfrauds...