Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
Wed Jun 24, 2015, 10:10 AM Jun 2015

Unsend! New Gmail button users from sending regrettable emails

*Maybe not a bad idea for all social media too

By Associated Press | San Francisco
Wednesday, 24 June 2015

Google is making it easier to avoid getting into trouble with a misdirected or inappropriate email.

An option to cancel the delivery of an email within 30 seconds of hitting the send button is now a standard safeguard in Google’s Gmail as part of a settings change made this week.

The “undo send” feature had previously been available for several years in Google’s experimental labs, requiring Gmail users to take extra steps to get it.

Gmail accountholders will now be able to activate the protection in Gmail’s settings. The tool delays the delivery of emails from five to 30 seconds after the send button is pressed to give users a fleeting chance to retrieve an email mistakenly sent to the wrong person or an ill-conceived communique.

http://english.alarabiya.net/en/media/digital/2015/06/24/Google-protects-Gmail-users-from-sending-regrettable-notes.html

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Unsend! New Gmail button users from sending regrettable emails (Original Post) Jefferson23 Jun 2015 OP
Or, you know, you could just engage your brain... malthaussen Jun 2015 #1
Sure, but I wonder how many friendships lost b/c someone was too emotional Jefferson23 Jun 2015 #2
Well, as to the first point... malthaussen Jun 2015 #3
The firefighter? He may have had no authority nor ability to work alone to act on his hatred, and Jefferson23 Jun 2015 #5
best lesson i ever taught myself was to fill in the "to:" section *last* unblock Jun 2015 #4

malthaussen

(17,175 posts)
1. Or, you know, you could just engage your brain...
Wed Jun 24, 2015, 10:41 AM
Jun 2015

... before you put your mouth (or keyboard) in drive.

-- Mal

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
2. Sure, but I wonder how many friendships lost b/c someone was too emotional
Wed Jun 24, 2015, 10:52 AM
Jun 2015

to think first. On the other hand, I appreciate when a racist/bigot sends out his clear meaning and
intent..we get a warning. A recent example is the volunteer firefighter condoning the Charleston
murders. If he did not send out that message he would still be in a position as a firefighter who
could very possibly not perform his job due to the inhabitants being African American.

malthaussen

(17,175 posts)
3. Well, as to the first point...
Wed Jun 24, 2015, 11:02 AM
Jun 2015

... if a friendship is so volatile that it cannot withstand a hasty word, then it is perhaps not best called a "friendship." I've always liked John D. MacDonald's defintion: a friend is someone you can say any damned thing to, and he can say anything to you.

As to the second point, I also appreciate it when someone in a position of trust or authority makes an ill-advised comment which reveals his real self. Although in the particular instance of the firefighter, he probably congratulated himself for his generosity in serving all citizens regardless of his private thoughts. Police however...

-- Mal

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
5. The firefighter? He may have had no authority nor ability to work alone to act on his hatred, and
Wed Jun 24, 2015, 11:12 AM
Jun 2015

and hopefully never will. Condoning murder takes one to a different status when your job
is about saving lives.

Friends can forgive, of course..I tend to think e-mails..the printed word, may leave
a bite longer than a personal confrontation/mishap.

unblock

(52,118 posts)
4. best lesson i ever taught myself was to fill in the "to:" section *last*
Wed Jun 24, 2015, 11:10 AM
Jun 2015

type the entire message and proofread it first, and only at the end of the process, fill in the 'to:' section, double-check that, then finally click 'send'.

rather more cumbersome when doing a 'reply', or worse, 'reply-all', unfortunately. to my mind, this is a software design flaw in emailers. i should be able to type my reply first and then pull in the 'to:' and 'cc:' addresses later a la 'reply'/'reply-all'.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Unsend! New Gmail button ...